The Twins are getting a publicly financed stadium, and all we get is this dirty T-shirt

By Steve Perry
Thursday, March 20, 2008 at 10:49 am

Today may be the official start of spring, but the Minnesota Twins have already spent weeks carpet-bombing radio listeners with commercials touting all the fun to come. One upcoming promotion in particular stood out for its, well, uniqueness. On July 18, the first 5,000 fans 18 or over to enter the gates will receive a commemorative T-shirt with ground-in dirt from the construction site where the team’s new ballpark is scheduled to open in 2010.

“The Twins want to give me a dirty T-shirt?” exclaimed a friend who heard the ad. No–the Twins want to give him a dirt-infused T-shirt, and there’s a profound difference: A dirty T-shirt has dirt on it. A dirt T-shirt has dirt in it.

I searched the web for a photo of this cherished and almost priceless relic-to-be, but in vain. I guess you’ll have to be there. Meantime, a breakdown of the associated costs of producing this once in a lifetime collectible:

Unit cost to Twins of manufacturing each shirt: $3-5

Unit cost to Hennepin County taxpayers of manufacturing each shirt: $70,600*

*Public sales tax contribution to ballpark of $353 million divided by 5,000 units

Categories & Tags: | | | |

Comments

9 Comments

minnesotacharm
Comment posted March 20, 2008 @ 8:38 pm

Isn’t this issue a little dead? I mean, I know there are some people who are, shall we say, a bit upset about the new Twins stadium and the accompanying public contribution.  But didn’t that happen two years ago?  In an election year where the Hennepin County voters, if that upset about the tax, had every opportunity to throw the commissioners who voted for the stadium out of office?  And didn’t?

Perhaps this anger would be better directed at Tim Pawlenty’s tax cuts that are designed only to better improve his chances of becoming VP as opposed to bettering Minnesota.  The Twins stadium is hardly the problem.

Plus, if you’re not excited about watching Joe Mauer on a warm sunny spring or summer evening, there’s something wrong with you.


hiramfoster
Comment posted March 21, 2008 @ 10:38 am

Twins Stadium The Twins Stadium argument is still important because the Vikings are lined up right behind them with stadium demands of their own.

The Twins Stadium, when completed, will be a monument to government waste, and misplaced government priorities. It’s a drag on the economy, which for some inexplicalbe reason, the taxpayers of Hennepin County are obliged to subsidize. We were all burned by this one, and it is so important not to let it happen again.


minnesotacharm
Comment posted March 21, 2008 @ 4:40 pm

Hennepin County voters do not agree Unfortunately, the voters of Hennepin County apparently do not agree with you that the Twins stadium is a waste of resources.  Presumably they would have punished at the polls the very commissioners who pushed the project if they felt that way — they did not, however, and in fact reelected every commissioner who pushed the project.

This evidence also contradicts your assertion that “we were all burned on this one.”  If so, why aren’t the voters doing something about it?

The Vikings plan — such as it is — calls for no contribution from Hennepin County, but rather from the state.  I wouldn’t be worried; there’s no way the state is putting up half a billion for a stadium right now.  Nor do I expect Hennepin County is going to volunteer to put up that kind of dough again.


hiramfoster
Comment posted March 22, 2008 @ 7:56 am

The Twins Nobody can say with assurance what the voters of Hennepin County think about the issues. What we do know with complete cetainty, is that stadium proponents when to great lengths to prevent us from finding out. We also know that St. Paul voters rejected the Twins Stadium, a fact which just might have played a role in the stadium backers fierce opposition to any referendum on the Hennepin County proposal.

It’s true, the Hennepin County deal seems to be a one time only proposition for the sports franchises. If the Vikings are going to succeed, they are going to have to find a different set of politicians willing to shaft their constituents. And of course, they are going to have to wait a while in the hope that what happened to Hennepin County taxpayers will recede in memory.


minnesotacharm
Comment posted March 20, 2008 @ 3:38 pm

Isn't this issue a little dead? I mean, I know there are some people who are, shall we say, a bit upset about the new Twins stadium and the accompanying public contribution.  But didn't that happen two years ago?  In an election year where the Hennepin County voters, if that upset about the tax, had every opportunity to throw the commissioners who voted for the stadium out of office?  And didn't?

Perhaps this anger would be better directed at Tim Pawlenty's tax cuts that are designed only to better improve his chances of becoming VP as opposed to bettering Minnesota.  The Twins stadium is hardly the problem.

Plus, if you're not excited about watching Joe Mauer on a warm sunny spring or summer evening, there's something wrong with you.


hiramfoster
Comment posted March 21, 2008 @ 5:38 am

Twins Stadium The Twins Stadium argument is still important because the Vikings are lined up right behind them with stadium demands of their own.

The Twins Stadium, when completed, will be a monument to government waste, and misplaced government priorities. It's a drag on the economy, which for some inexplicalbe reason, the taxpayers of Hennepin County are obliged to subsidize. We were all burned by this one, and it is so important not to let it happen again.


minnesotacharm
Comment posted March 21, 2008 @ 11:40 am

Hennepin County voters do not agree Unfortunately, the voters of Hennepin County apparently do not agree with you that the Twins stadium is a waste of resources.  Presumably they would have punished at the polls the very commissioners who pushed the project if they felt that way — they did not, however, and in fact reelected every commissioner who pushed the project.

This evidence also contradicts your assertion that “we were all burned on this one.”  If so, why aren't the voters doing something about it?

The Vikings plan — such as it is — calls for no contribution from Hennepin County, but rather from the state.  I wouldn't be worried; there's no way the state is putting up half a billion for a stadium right now.  Nor do I expect Hennepin County is going to volunteer to put up that kind of dough again.


hiramfoster
Comment posted March 22, 2008 @ 2:56 am

The Twins Nobody can say with assurance what the voters of Hennepin County think about the issues. What we do know with complete cetainty, is that stadium proponents when to great lengths to prevent us from finding out. We also know that St. Paul voters rejected the Twins Stadium, a fact which just might have played a role in the stadium backers fierce opposition to any referendum on the Hennepin County proposal.

It's true, the Hennepin County deal seems to be a one time only proposition for the sports franchises. If the Vikings are going to succeed, they are going to have to find a different set of politicians willing to shaft their constituents. And of course, they are going to have to wait a while in the hope that what happened to Hennepin County taxpayers will recede in memory.


TwinCitizen
Comment posted August 29, 2008 @ 10:19 pm

The shirt actually just had a little patch of screenprint on it with dirt mixed in with the ink. Pretty lame if you ask me.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.