<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Edwards, marriage &#8216;complicated&#8217;; for Pawlenty, election certificate &#8216;involved&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/34338/pawlenty-takes-cue-from-elizabeth-edwards-calls-election-certificate-question-involved/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/34338/pawlenty-takes-cue-from-elizabeth-edwards-calls-election-certificate-question-involved</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:34:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: geek</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/34338/pawlenty-takes-cue-from-elizabeth-edwards-calls-election-certificate-question-involved/comment-page-1#comment-30581</link>
		<dc:creator>geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 19:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=34338#comment-30581</guid>
		<description>Edwards went on national TV, what do she think the questions were going to be, about football?

I had thought Pawlenty a viable VP candidate, not now.  His position on the election certification is far from complicated.  There are are a limited set of outcomes, not thinking that through and knowing how you will respond, is either stupid or dishonest regardless he lost my future consideration.  Another hack is what he has proven to be.

I am the Governor of the State, if the State Judicial system renders a decision I am going to act as Governor for the people of Minnesota. If the candidate pushes this to the Supreme Court that is there right but I am going to act as the leader of the State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edwards went on national TV, what do she think the questions were going to be, about football?</p>
<p>I had thought Pawlenty a viable VP candidate, not now.  His position on the election certification is far from complicated.  There are are a limited set of outcomes, not thinking that through and knowing how you will respond, is either stupid or dishonest regardless he lost my future consideration.  Another hack is what he has proven to be.</p>
<p>I am the Governor of the State, if the State Judicial system renders a decision I am going to act as Governor for the people of Minnesota. If the candidate pushes this to the Supreme Court that is there right but I am going to act as the leader of the State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/34338/pawlenty-takes-cue-from-elizabeth-edwards-calls-election-certificate-question-involved/comment-page-1#comment-30542</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=34338#comment-30542</guid>
		<description>Though the answers might be similar levels of dodging, there&#039;s an important difference. Pawlenty is dodging about a matter of public interest, while Edwards was asked about a purely personal matter. If Pawlenty wants to leave open the question of whether he would sign the election certificate, this should be a controversy, but if Edwards doesn&#039;t want to discuss her marriage, she shouldn&#039;t have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the answers might be similar levels of dodging, there&#8217;s an important difference. Pawlenty is dodging about a matter of public interest, while Edwards was asked about a purely personal matter. If Pawlenty wants to leave open the question of whether he would sign the election certificate, this should be a controversy, but if Edwards doesn&#8217;t want to discuss her marriage, she shouldn&#8217;t have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
