U.S. Rep. Erik Paulsen’s campaign paid his wife more than $10,000 in the last five months of 2008, according to Federal Election Commission records. (No such revelations about his DFL opponent, a bachelor.)
The payments include seven payroll checks from Aug. 27 to Dec. 11, 2008, that total $9,729, as well as a Nov. 12 reimbursement of $728 on Nov. 12 for travel to Washington, D.C.
Carolyn “Kelly” Paulsen managed the campaign office, Paulsen campaign treasurer Reid LeBeau told Democratic blogger Brian Falldin.
The payments don’t violate the law, Polinaut points out. Attempts at banning the practice have failed in Congress, leaving spousal pay for campaign work legal if sometimes controversial.
Stirring controversy by keeping campaign cash in the family wasn’t a problem for Paulsen’s Third Congressional District Democratic rival: Ashwin Madia is unmarried.
But Paulsen’s campaign tried to make that fact a problem for Madia last fall. Paulsen ally state Sen. Geoff Michel held a Sept. 30 State Capitol press conference to tar Madia as having inadequate “suburban life experience“:
Raising a family in the district. Sending your kids to the public school. Owning a home. Working in the 3rd District. Paying property taxes in the 3rd District. Erik Paulsen has done all these things, and Ashwin Madia has not.
The next day, Michel appeared again before state Capitol microphones (crashing a Madia news conference), this time joined by state Republican Party Chairman Ron Carey, who expanded on the demographic attack:
Erik Paulsen … really fits the 3rd District so well, as one of them. And so people need to understand that there is a sharp contrast between the candidates. …Erik Paulsen is a very good fit from a philosophical standpoint and a lifestyle standpoint … From a demographic standpoint Erik Paulsen fits the district very well.














4 Comments »
Comment posted May 13, 2009 @ 9:38 pm
His spouse most likely more than earned the money. I’d rather that Madia had won though. Mr. Paulsen is more of the same old GOP on policy.
Comment posted May 13, 2009 @ 9:54 pm
Paulsen has drunk deeply of the conservative kool-aid. Too bad it didn’t kill him. And too bad he’s unable to think independently. Listening to him is like listening to a parrot.
Comment posted May 15, 2009 @ 10:25 am
Erik has voted in a few ways that should make you happy, Alan.
He voted to expand health care to children and recently voted in favor of the Keith Ellison sponsored credit card bill. He is showing some independence.
I am disappointed the campaign paid his wife. That stinks and should not be legal. Erik, a better decision would have been to pay a few college interns or someone unemployed who worked hard for you on the campaign.
I guessing that your wife really didn’t NEED that money.
Pingback posted October 9, 2009 @ 4:01 pm
[...] (CMW) — Hello Erik. Remember me? I was the guy who exposed the fact you paid your wife with campaign funds. I also snitched on you about how you secretly didn’t offer health insurance benefits to [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment