Anti-bullying bill passes House, heads to governor

By Andy Birkey
Monday, May 18, 2009 at 9:29 pm
State Capitol (Wikipedia)

State Capitol (Wikipedia)

The Safe Schools for All bill passed the Minnesota House on Monday and is heading to the desk of Gov. Tim Pawlenty. The bill would add 14 characteristics to existing anti-bullying policies and directs schools to beef up their anti-bullying programs. The bill passed by a vote of 95 to 39. It’s unclear whether Gov. Pawlenty will sign or veto the bill, but if the bill can retain the support of eight members in the House, a veto would likely be over-ridden.

The bill passed but not without intense debate. Rep. Jim Davnie, DFL-Minneapolis, carried the bill this session. “The politics are challenging; the stories from students and families have often been hard to hear,” he said. “What we know is that if you want an effective policy it needs to be clear, and that’s what SF971 will do.”

The main concern from some Republican legislators is that the bill spells out specific groups such as gay and lesbian students, students with disabilities and children from different socioeconomic strata.

Rep. Dean Urdahl, R-Grove City, offered an amendment to strike those categories from the bill. “One group does not rise above another,” he said. The amendment failed on a voice vote.

Davnie argued for the importance of the categories. “[Students] need and deserve to see themselves reflected in school policies. The child hears, ‘if somebody is bothering me, the adults in the school will help me,’” he said.

Rep. Rob Eastlund, R-Isanti, said, “there’s a politically motivated effort because passing legislation feels good. We don’t need to list out a long list of special interest groups.”

Rep. John Ward, DFL-Brainerd, gave a passionate speech about being bullied in school because of his disability.

“People that get bullied are often the people who look or act different. I remember being on the playground and continually being teased or picked on because of how I looked,” said Ward. “All children deserve to be treated fairly and equitably and with respect. When you talk about special groups being named… Anything we can do to move in that direction is progress.”

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Comments

5 Comments

News Day: Minnesota’s midnight madness / MN Job Watch / NYT and plagiarism / more « Mary Turck
Pingback posted May 19, 2009 @ 8:42 am

[...] The legislature passed an anti-bullying amendment, over strong Republican opposition. The Minnesota Independent reports that the bill specifically includes gay and lesbian students, students with disabilities and [...]


jason
Comment posted May 19, 2009 @ 11:32 am

so obviously republicans would prefer that homosexuals, people with disabilities, and people from with a different social status be made fun of and forced to feel alienated from the rest of the peers. thanks republicans. thats really great of you. very christian as well. im sure jesus would approve. i remember reading in the bible that jesus was always picking on people that were different. that jesus was a big bully. Oh wait…


Jerry
Comment posted May 20, 2009 @ 8:45 am

Here’s the Republican position: Being gay or lesbian is a choice; people who choose that “lifestyle” are deviant and should not be protected from other people who disagree with their “choice”. By naming them specifically in the bill, we’re condoning their “lifestyle”, because after all, if they don’t want to be bullied, they can just choose to be straight.

Not sure what disabled people who don’t want to be bullied are suppose to do….


Nate
Comment posted May 22, 2009 @ 11:18 am

Bullying is wrong, for any reason. Give me a break Jason and Jerry. Do we really need to make a list of all the types that need to be protected? What about those that are short, tall, overweight, skinny, wear glasses, braces, have an accent, wear old shoes, have a uni-brow, etc etc. People have and will be teased for all of those things, unfortunately. Do you see where i’m going? A list would be never ending. You can protect against bullying without listing every possible “group” that might be bullied.


Eva Young
Comment posted May 23, 2009 @ 9:17 am

Nate’s objection wouldn’t be made if gays were not included in the bill. The opposition is all about the homos. Read the Minnesota Family Council’s hysterical bleatings on the topic.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.