Comments on: Coleman bid to have campaign pay personal lawyers draws formal objection http://minnesotaindependent.com/35149/crew-coleman-fec News. Politics. Media. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: jason http://minnesotaindependent.com/35149/crew-coleman-fec/comment-page-1#comment-31112 jason Wed, 20 May 2009 16:50:24 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=35149#comment-31112 the comments let by rick are the joke. rick sounds like the kind of guy that would happily screw people over as long as he gets ahead. sounds like you and norm would get along great. the comments let by rick are the joke. rick sounds like the kind of guy that would happily screw people over as long as he gets ahead. sounds like you and norm would get along great.

]]> By: Tommy Johnson http://minnesotaindependent.com/35149/crew-coleman-fec/comment-page-1#comment-31089 Tommy Johnson Wed, 20 May 2009 13:32:29 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=35149#comment-31089 "...I also find it funny that Coleman is renting out basically a closet at a friends house in D.C. ..." Yeah, "right." The MLS for W.D.C. shows the property sold for $989.000 on March 15th, 2007; it also shows that what you call "basically a closet" is in fact a legally-licensed seperate rental unit - complete with seperate electric meters. And it's telling that Coleman has never offered up copies of utility bills for his D.C. rental unit; proving - once and for all - just exactly who paid for the utilities at that legally licensed seperate rental unit. I'm guessing the reason Coleman hasn't offered up copies, even though on August 4th, 2008 Coleman's spokesman (Mark Drake) said he'd check, is because Coleman did NOT pay for those utilities - which, of course, would be another problem for Coleman. Those concerned with the rules, regulations, and laws as actually written, are concerned that Coleman broke more than just a few. Suits, rent, utility bills, unearned income - maybe that's "nitpicking" on the "right" side of the aisle when done by someone from the "right" side of the aisle; personally, I'd like to hear what a magistrate calls it. “…I also find it funny that Coleman is renting out basically a closet at a friends house in D.C. …”

Yeah, “right.”

The MLS for W.D.C. shows the property sold for $989.000 on March 15th, 2007; it also shows that what you call “basically a closet” is in fact a legally-licensed seperate rental unit – complete with seperate electric meters.

And it’s telling that Coleman has never offered up copies of utility bills for his D.C. rental unit; proving – once and for all – just exactly who paid for the utilities at that legally licensed seperate rental unit.

I’m guessing the reason Coleman hasn’t offered up copies, even though on August 4th, 2008 Coleman’s spokesman (Mark Drake) said he’d check, is because Coleman did NOT pay for those utilities – which, of course, would be another problem for Coleman.

Those concerned with the rules, regulations, and laws as actually written, are concerned that Coleman broke more than just a few.

Suits, rent, utility bills, unearned income – maybe that’s “nitpicking” on the “right” side of the aisle when done by someone from the “right” side of the aisle; personally, I’d like to hear what a magistrate calls it.

]]> By: Rick http://minnesotaindependent.com/35149/crew-coleman-fec/comment-page-1#comment-31074 Rick Wed, 20 May 2009 04:33:25 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=35149#comment-31074 That list is a joke. Stevens is on it and the prosecuting team was reamed by the judge in Stevens case basically calling the Stevens case a "partisan hatchet job." I also find it funny that Coleman is renting out basically a closet at a friends house in D.C. but is somehow guilty of favoratism? C'mon, let's get real here. This nitpicking in politics about buying suits, plane rides, price of rent, really is just plain nitpicking by groups such as this run by people who can't get a real job, sort of like an ACLU lawyer, can't make it in the real world and graduated at the bottom of their class and somehow slipped through the bar exam. That list is a joke. Stevens is on it and the prosecuting team was reamed by the judge in Stevens case basically calling the Stevens case a “partisan hatchet job.” I also find it funny that Coleman is renting out basically a closet at a friends house in D.C. but is somehow guilty of favoratism? C’mon, let’s get real here. This nitpicking in politics about buying suits, plane rides, price of rent, really is just plain nitpicking by groups such as this run by people who can’t get a real job, sort of like an ACLU lawyer, can’t make it in the real world and graduated at the bottom of their class and somehow slipped through the bar exam.

]]>