Comments on: Judge threatens mistrial in Fong Lee case

By: Fong Lee

Fong Lee — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:09:35 +0000

I am Fong’s cousin, as you can see my name is also Fong. I just want to say to you Realist, that I hope God spares you and that he might forgive you for your evil thoughts. The cop obviously shot my cousin. He even beat up his girlfriend after that, and was fired from the police department. Even now he is trying to sue the department for his job back. The cheif of the department had even commented that ” Sometimes Andersen went overboard with his job…”. I think that you have too hard of a heart. May God forgive you.

By: Dezzamn

Dezzamn — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:54:00 +0000

Sure is america…….where nothing is free especially if you beg for it, even if it was yours to begin with.

By: V8L

V8L — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:28:56 +0000

OH YAH… THIS IS AMERICA.

this link is for people who want to be a good judge

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bao_Zheng

GOD IS WATCHING!!!

By: KOJ TSI PAUB

KOJ TSI PAUB — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:02:46 +0000

REALIST, I WONDER WHO YOU REALLY ARE…… IT’S FUNNY THAT I SEE YOUR REALIST OPINION EVERYWHERE….. LOL… IT’S OKAY TO TRY TO DEFEND ANY PARTY…. BUT I GUESS ONLY FONG AND ANDERSEN WILL REALLY KNOW WHAT HAPPENED THAT DAY. FOR THOSE WHO HAVE GONE WILL REST IN PEACE IT’S THOSE WHO REMAIN, THAT WILL LIVE WITH THE TRUTH TIL DEATH. I GUESS YOU CAN SAY WHATEVER YOU WANT.. PEOPLE LIKE TO OPEN THERE BIG MOUTH AND YAP BLAH BLAH BLAH. BUT IT DOESN’T HURT UNTIL ITS YOU OR SOMEONE CLOSE TO YOU. PAIN IS SOME THING THAT THE HUMAN BODY RESPONSE TO IMMEDIATELY (I AM NOT HIGHLY EDUCATED BUT I DROP WHAT I AM DOING WHEN I GET A CRAMP IN MY LEG IMAGINE BULLETS PERICE AT ANY POINT OF YOUR BODY..GET REALIST..), I THINK THAT THE 1ST BULLET WOULD’VE TAKEN FONG DOWN HE WOULD’VE BEEN HURT ENOUGH TO DROP THE GUN (IF HE HAD ONE). ANDERSEN WOULD’VE SEEN THE GUN DROP I MEAN ANDERSEN 1ST SAW THE GUN FROM HIS POTROL CAR WHY WOULD HE NOT SEE IT SLIP OUT OF FONGS HAND (THE GUN WAS FOUND OUT OF RANGE), SO WHY THE NEED FOR THE OTHER SHOTS. OH DUH… THIS IS AMERICAN, THE LAND OF THE FREE FOR THOSE WHO CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE. TAKE OVER PEOPLES LAND, USE PEOPLE AS SLAVES, SLAUGHTER PEOPLE AND USE THE LAW TO GET DIRTY. THE MOST CORRUPTED PEOPLE ARE THOSE WORKING UNDER THE LAW, NOT THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE LAW. WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT COPS GETTING TRAINED TO SHOOT FOR THE CHEST UNLESS YOU ARE A COP…. YOU SEEM TO BE SO KNOWLEDGIBLE OF WHAT CAN BE DONE WITH IN THE LAW… I MEAN OUR HMONG HUNTERS CAN SHOOT AND KILL SQUIARES AND BIRDS AT GAMING, HOW HARD WOULD IT BE FOR A TRAINED COP TO AIM FOR THE LOW PARTS OF A HUMAN BODY. NOT SO HARD UNLESS YOU ARE TRAINED FOR NO MERCY. I WOULDN’T BE SURPRISE IF YOU ARE ANDERSEN OR FRIEND OF HIM. I MEAN WHO TAKES THE TIME TO WRITE THIS SHIT UP IF YOU ARE NOT DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY A CASE LIKE THIS. IF IT WAS A WHITE GANGSTER LIKE BOY RIDING THAT BIKE THAT DAY WOULD ANDERSEN WOULD STILL SHOOT THE BOY LIKE HE DID FONG. BS. WHEN DID A WHITE COP SHOOT AT A GANGSTER LIKE WHITE BOY 8 TIMES. HOW MANY CASES DO YOU KNOW OF? HOW MANY SHOTS IN THE CHEST DOES IT TAKE TO KILL ANY LIVING BEING? PEOPLE LIKE TO TALK SHIT PRETEND RACISTSISUM DOESN’T EXSIT BUT IT STILL RUNS THICK IN AMERICA. PEOPLE WILL BE LIENT ONLY TO THEIR KIND IT NATURAL. FOREVER REST IN PEACE FONG!!!! LIVE IN A COUNTY WHERE YOU ARE A MONORITY AND SEE HOW FAR YOU GET.

By: MoJo

MoJo — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:41:42 +0000

In addition to my opinion on this matter, I’d like to add some facts for those who might believe that Fong murdered himself. The officer in question is being re-questioned about another case where he allegedly planted a gun. Now, we can say that the antics of Fong’s family is giving room for convicted criminals to try and wiggle their way out of trouble. We can also say that their unwavering efforts in the pursuit of justice have inspired others to not let misused authority ruin their lives. Whatever perspective may be taken, let us not forget the consistency of a questionable character. There was the racist remark kept on record, which triggered a disciplinary action and convinces me that it probably wasn’t very slight in nature. There is the ever-so-controversial, yet seemingly hopeless case of Fong Lee. Then now there is the plight of Quenton Williams who claims to have suffered from the actions of this very same officer. Oh, and did I mention that the officer in question has recently been arrested for domestic assault? I mean surely a man of his position, trusted to carry out extremely aggressive police work, awarded the Medal of Valor for his courageous actions in killing a non-worthy gangster who brought death upon himself, now also being questioned in a similar case, and disciplined for a record of racism, would be able to refrain from domestically assaulting one of his fellow citizens whom he is sworn to serve and protect. Now pardon my sarcasm. I do understand the need for aggressive police work. I just think that police officers as public servants sometime loose sight of their job descriptions. If surveillance shows that Fong Lee brought death upon himself, then I guess it is true that Rodney King brought first degree assault to himself too. The officers in that case were found not guilty, and that decision is ridiculous as footage and public reactions have shown. Racial profiling is absolutely a real problem. What’s unacceptable is the failure to acknowledge this problem as innocent people do loose their lives.

By: MoJo

MoJo — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:54:34 +0000

It’s obvious why the officer in question is a free man. There’s never been a proven case involving a gun planted by law enforcement in the history of the United States. It won’t be easy for Fong’s case to be the first. Although there does seem to exist a lack of evidence on behalf of the victim’s family and representatives, all the police department has as evidence is the word of one man. That very same man has a history of exhibiting racist character. The officer’s record shows him to be the recipient of disciplinary action in response to derogatory racial terms made by him. Though that fact does not prove anything, why not just let teachers who openly joke about raping kids continue teaching our children? I mean, we need teachers right?

Let’s face it. There needs to be social control, and there are powerful people in powerful places to ensure that. That’s why there’s never been a proven case of law enforcement planting guns to clean up their mess. I don’t believe the argument to be of a case of conspiracy to cover up hate crimes against young Hmong men. I believe what the majority of Fong Lee supporters want is justice for all. The assumption that Fong was a no-good gangster who made very bad decisions is purely just that, an assumption. Sure his record may show some minor misconduct, but so does that of the officer in question. So let the labels fly.

It’s true that the evidence to support Fong’s case is perhaps insufficient. That does not go to say that it hasn’t been made that way. However, I am biased in my opinion just like many of my counterparts “undeniably” are. The paranoia of a conspiracy to cover-up the horribly lethal mistakes of one man may very well be. So why believe it without evidence some might say, right? Yet, in a different sense with the same purpose to maintain social control, no one has proven god to exist. So let’s call that paranoia too.

By: HerS

HerS — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:48:21 +0000

I think this guy shouldn’t even be a judge.
He’s a hater for he don’t know any thing by law.

By: Realist

Realist — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:57:11 +0000

If the evidence were so obvious in the favor of V8L, why is it the officer in question is a free man? You can keep crying racist conspiracy, but you have NO EVIDENCE. Just because you can’t clearly see a TINY gun (designed for CONCEALMENT) in a GRAINY, POOR QUALITY surveillance video does not mean it wasn’t there, and just because prints couldn’t be lifted from a TEXTURED SURFACE (the GRIP) doesn’t mean Fong was not holding the gun.

I challenge you all to prove me wrong about lifting prints from a textured surface like a gun GRIP. I’ll bet NONE of you can do it. Of course you can get prints from smooth surfaces like the slide, but no one TOUCHES the slide of a gun, they hold it by the GRIP. You can NOT lift latent prints off a heavily textured surface like a gun grip.

Seriously, it is all of you IGNORANTLY arguing with me that need to take a class and stop watching CSI Miami for you forensic education. I wouldn’t be talking about this stuff if I didn’t have some experience in the area. Seriously, this is like arguing with a five year old that refuses to accept that the sky is blue.

By: V8L

V8L — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:13:45 +0000

If they found Fong’s finger prints then the gun is belong to Fong. if not then it’s not Fong’s, how sample it is. but seems like “no finger prints” on the gun then it can’t be an evidence.
if you “can’t see a gun in the video” then the video can’t be an evidence.

When you combine all the evidences, you know the answer already. (Fong can’t clean up his finger print, edit the video, wipe his blood out or the gun… because he is already dead) All the evidences left behinde are the FACTS, the only thing is that Fong has yellow skin, brown eyes, and black hair that’s all.

“8 shots is perfectly reasonable if that is what it takes to subdue a suspect with a gun.”
to kill an unarmed boy you mean? (Please prove that Fong has a gun PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE)

God will not let that officer have a happy life, watch!

By: fantasy

fantasy — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 07:31:21 +0000

HEY REALIST:
do you believe in karma?