Too late to eat crow with Charles Krauthammer

By Chris Steller
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 at 2:25 pm

krauthammer_image_195x272It is too late to eat crow with Charles Krauthammer, according to the Center for the American Experiment. The conservative Minneapolis think tank’s June 1 annual dinner, with the Washington Post columnist as keynoter, is sold out. I lambasted Krauthammer when the event was announced last January and had no reason to change my tune until yesterday, when I found myself agreeing with large helpings of his column in the Star Tribune titled, “Obama asks: What would W. have done?

In the piece, Krauthammer helpfully provides a one-stop shop for policies that other conservative columnists have observed Obama carrying over from Bush, starting the list by quoting the National Review’s Victor Davis Hanson, who backed Bush:

The Patriot Act, wiretaps, e-mail intercepts, military tribunals, Predator drone attacks, Iraq (i.e. slowing the withdrawal), Afghanistan (i.e. the surge) — and now Guantanamo.

Krauthammer adds, in a paraphrase of conservative Jack Goldsmith in the New Republic:

rendition — turning over terrorists seized abroad to foreign countries; state secrets — claiming them in court to quash legal proceedings on rendition and other erstwhile barbarisms; and the denial of habeas corpus — to detainees in Afghanistan’s Bagram prison, indistinguishable logically and morally from Guantanamo.

For Krauthammer, who led a staggering recent run of pro-torture columns on the Strib’s op-ed pages with not one but two recent pieces, crow has to be a recommended dietary staple. I’d join him next Monday, but the Center for the American Experiment tells me tickets are gone — from the $25,000 table to the $250 cheap seats.

Comments

1 Comment

Penigma
Comment posted May 27, 2009 @ 12:51 pm

Chris,

It’s fatuous to say Obama has embraced W’s policies. That’s simply babble from the right. He has not UTTERLY terminated some programs, but normally, when you scratch slightly beneath the surface you find Obama has moved dramatically away from what Bush did.

For example, Tribunals, Obama decided to not completely do away with them, that’s true, but what the folks like Krauthammer fail to point out is that Obama has said he’ll have no more than 20 cases in front of Tribunals, of 241 total cases Bush would have sent there. That’s a 90% reduction – and of the twenty, it’s entirely possible 13 were already existing cases.

As I recall the rendition quesiton is really the same sort of thing. We’re closing those prisions, (which Bush said he’d do EVENTUALLY), and looking for places to hold the prisoners among our allies in an OPEN way. We have essentially (under Obama) repudiated secret transfers to black site prisons.

While I’m not entirely happy with Obama’s backtracking on some issues (in part), the fact is, in most cases, he took 10 steps forward and 1 or 2 steps back. He’s not on the same line of conduct as Bush, and suggestions that he is are merely more political cover for those who advocate torture, rendition, and US ethno-centric hubris.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.