Even as Norm Coleman’s prospects for regaining his Senate seat subside, his potential entry in the race to replace retiring Gov. Tim Pawlenty next year is getting a push in the media — if nowhere else.
Today it’s a post at Politico that speculates on whether Coleman could make the jump from confirmed ex-senator to governor. Unnamed insiders say he’s really, really not thinking about being governor. Named outsiders say it’s a moot point: Coleman’s done with elective office whether he wants to be or not.
Coleman sought the governorship in 1998 (and lost to Jesse Ventura) — and would have sought it again in 2002 if the White House hadn’t ordered him to swap races with Pawlenty. (That turned out to be a good move as both Republicans won in three-way contests.)
The problem — as David Weigel writes at the Minnesota Independent’s sister site, The Washington Independent — is that polls show “Minnesotans simply don’t like the guy.”
Weigel makes an instructive contrast between Coleman and Sen. Roland Burris (D-Ill.). Burris is also unelected in 2008, also beset with scandal, and yet no one’s floating him for another office — because, Weigel writes, “that would be crazy.”













6 Comments »
Comment posted June 8, 2009 @ 10:52 am
if coleman becomes our next governor, i am out of here. hello canada!
Comment posted June 8, 2009 @ 10:55 am
Mr. Coleman has put his personal interests above the interests of nearly 5 million Minnesotans to have full representation in the Senate. I will never support him for a role in public affairs in the future. I speculate that he sold his soul to the Republicans, dragging out a merit-less legal fight over the US senate seat in exchange for future riches and reductions debt obligation by deep-pocket Republican benefactors.
Why should any citizen trust him to put their interests first, should he hold a public post of any kind?
Comment posted June 8, 2009 @ 11:28 am
If Minnesota Republicans have any sense they will stay far away from that opportunist who has gone to court with every election loss. The guy is a political boat anchor at best.
They don’t, they won’t.
Comment posted June 8, 2009 @ 12:19 pm
Yup, if he can’t be senator he’ll have to be governor. There aren’t any other people in Minnesota are there? Nope. Well, that’s it then, Franken senator, Coleman governor and Pawlenty president. Minnesota is so easy.
Comment posted June 8, 2009 @ 4:12 pm
No wonder that Senate race was a toss-up. “No-one” likes Norm Coleman, and “no-one” likes Al Franken either. (To be more accurate and kind, both Al Franken and Norm Coleman score low in likeability by voters in polls.) Democrats who endorsed Franken on the basis of “electability” really misread that one. The Democrats had Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, who comes across as so likable and authentic. Match him against a not so likeable Norm Coleman, and it is an easy win for the Democrats in the year of an Obama landslide. But match a not so likeable Democrat against a not so likeable epublican, and Dena Brakley gets lots of the votes and the rest are split.
Comment posted June 8, 2009 @ 4:43 pm
That’s not fair to say Minnesotan’s don’t want Coleman to run for governor. Many of us want him to run, and hope he’ll win the GOP nomination.
OK, I admit those Minnesotans are DFL, and we only want him to run, not win. But still.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment