<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local government aid cuts: Which cities will lose the most?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/37170/local-government-aid-cuts-which-cities-will-lose-the-most/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/37170/local-government-aid-cuts-which-cities-will-lose-the-most</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Blatt</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/37170/local-government-aid-cuts-which-cities-will-lose-the-most/comment-page-1#comment-33485</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Blatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=37170#comment-33485</guid>
		<description>He should cut more.  He shouldn&#039;t chicken out with just $200 million.  The deficit is $2.7 billion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He should cut more.  He shouldn&#8217;t chicken out with just $200 million.  The deficit is $2.7 billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mill</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/37170/local-government-aid-cuts-which-cities-will-lose-the-most/comment-page-1#comment-32594</link>
		<dc:creator>Mill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=37170#comment-32594</guid>
		<description>the fiscal hits in 2010 are really pretty big.   maybe economic activity will pick up by then.   maybe we&#039;ll take a little more tax from those few who are still doing fabulously well.

You can&#039;t cut your way to prosperity short-run.

In the medium run we should reconsider our balanced budget requirement.  Both options available to cover a budget gap - having to cut spending and/or raise taxes - those options are both bad ones when we&#039;re still contracting economically.  They&#039;ll make the recession worse, while concentrating  the latest pain on vulnerable citizens who need state services and public employees who provide those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fiscal hits in 2010 are really pretty big.   maybe economic activity will pick up by then.   maybe we&#8217;ll take a little more tax from those few who are still doing fabulously well.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t cut your way to prosperity short-run.</p>
<p>In the medium run we should reconsider our balanced budget requirement.  Both options available to cover a budget gap &#8211; having to cut spending and/or raise taxes &#8211; those options are both bad ones when we&#8217;re still contracting economically.  They&#8217;ll make the recession worse, while concentrating  the latest pain on vulnerable citizens who need state services and public employees who provide those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
