Comments on: Embattled homeowner has seven days to vacate foreclosed residence

By: MNIndy: Embattled homeowner has seven days to vacate foreclosed residence « Stop Foreclosures! Support Rosemary Williams

Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:23:31 +0000

[...] 18, 2009 · Leave a Comment Embattled homeowner has seven days to vacate foreclosed residence // By Paul Demko 6/18/09 3:29 PM Source: MN [...]

By: Brenda

Brenda — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:00:41 +0000

It is sad to see someone lose their home no matter what the back story is. Just because the law is right on the side of the mortgage company it does not mean the morally right things were done it allow a mortgage to anyone whose likelihood of paying substantially more – nearly twice the original payment when the adjustments occur. GMAC, itself brokers and underwriters and all the other mortgage companies who have made a practice of making such loan lost their moral center for short term greed.

I will not condemn her but I do condemn the ‘legal’ but flawed mortgage environment that allowed and encouraged so many of these bad mortgage loans.

I hope Rosemary will find a nice place she can afford and make the move soon. It is time to make a clean start leaving this terrible mistake behind now. Thousands of families and individuals have had to pack their lost in on homes that were part of their American Dream. I would start a new dream and make it happen.

By: Mary

Mary — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:42:12 +0000

Now if we can cancel contracts with UAW, we can get somewhere. Otherwise a fake bankruptcy. Also, I would like to declare BK and get rid off all my debts and keep my money. Where do I go?
(((((((((()))))))))
Fake bankruptcies, fake car companies, fake banks, all make me ill. REAL bankruptcies start soon, minus 100’s billions of taxpayers money.—STUPID STUPID STUPID

By: Random reader

Random reader — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:12:17 +0000

I just noticed the the headline. Wrong wording by a long shot. Rosemary is not a “homeowner”. She has not been a homeowner for months. Not since she stopped paying her mortgage and the house was foreclosed. A more accurate headline would have been:

Stubborn squatter has seven days to vacate foreclosed residence

By: Random reader

Random reader — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:07:53 +0000

So now Rosemary and her accomplice Cheri Honkala say that despite the court ruling they will try to stay in the house using civil disobedience! If they were not willing to abide by the court’s decision, why did they bring suit? Clearly they went to court in bad faith. Despicable. Not only does Rosemary refuse to pay back the money she borrowed (with her house as collateral) but she insists on wasting all of our tax dollars perpetrating a charade of a lawsuit.

I for one had sympathy for Rosemary when this began, but now I feel nothing but disgust. Imagine if the court had found in her favor and GMAC refused to abide by the decision? Can you imagine what the activists would say then? While, the situation is the same.

Go rent an apartment Rosemary and let somebody else buy the house. Somebody who will be more fiscally responsible.

By: Jesse

Jesse — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:54:59 +0000

How can you live some place for 26 years and be evicted? Clearly she pulled lots of money out of the home and got a big mortgage. Where is that money?