Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s recently announced plans to axe state refunds for political contributions of $50 or less has set off an email stampede, as candidates urge donors to give before the program dies July 1.
In the $2.7 billion of unallotments he unveiled on Tuesday, Pawlenty included a complete cutoff of $10 million in state funding for the cash-back campaign donation program. The program has no official name in state law, but the state Department of Revenue calls it the Political Contribution Refund Program.
Republicans get more money through the program than their rivals, but Pawlenty still dissed it as welfare for politicians. On his WCCO-AM radio program this morning Pawlenty allowed, “It’s a nice program,” but he said it was a lower priority than schools and health care.
A growing number of candidates and both other major parties have jumped on the short-notice deadline to make pitches via the Internet for refundable donations. (UPDATE: Republicans, remarkably, have joined them.)
In a Web solicitation, Independence Party Chair Jack Uldrich characterized the cut as hacking off the IP’s arm.
Democrats have used less vivid imagery but are communicating urgency all the same, with email subject lines like “Time is running out,” “Just 14 days to get your refund” and “Campaign Alert!”
In particular, those aiming to replace Pawlenty made sure to whack him as they made their appeals for fast cash. Here’s former State Sen. Steve Kelley:
By cutting off the Political Contribution Refund Program, Tim Pawlenty is impacting your voice in the governor’s race. Over 90,000 Minnesotans use the PCR program annually to make a refundable contribution to the candidate of their choice. … Before the program expires, make a refundable $50 contribution (or $100 for couples) to a Governor who will put education first!
Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner was even more pointed in her email plea:
In addition to making cuts that will disproportionately affect the poor, children and the elderly, the Governor also proposed eliminating a program that helps ordinary Minnesotans participate financially in the campaigns of their choice. … While Tim Pawlenty and other Republicans can afford to run their campaigns with large donations from PACs and wealthy individuals, we would prefer to run ours with money donated from all levels of givers.
Gaertner had a ready metaphor for donors unfamiliar with the soon-to-be-eliminated program: ”Think of your contribution as a temporary loan to the campaign.”
State Auditor Rebecca Otto, also a DFLer, curiously made a pitch for donations of as little as $5 rather than the maximum refundable amount of $50: “Can you afford to support my work with a monthly donation of $5, $10 or $15?” her email asked.
Gary Goldsmith, executive director of the state Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board, told the Minnesota Independent that his department doesn’t recognize pledges or plans as “contributions” under the refund program. He said donors or candidates with questions about the program’s phase-out should consult online memos from the campaign-finance board (pdf) and the Department of Revenue (pdf).
Pawlenty told his radio audience today that he’s heard more guff from legislators on the donation-refund program than any other unallotment item. Maybe that’s because it’s the one they can still do something about.
Here are some samples of appeals from candidates and parties, including those mentioned above plus state Rep. Paul Thissen and state Sen. John Marty (both gubernatorial candidates), and Secretary of State Mark Ritchie. Click on an image to enlarge. If you have seen or received other similar communications from candidates, please forward them to MnIndy.






















4 Comments »
Comment posted June 19, 2009 @ 6:04 pm
I see no reason whatsoever why the government should be paying 10 million to political parties, and I applaud Pawlenty for getting rid of it. I still get calls from the republicans asking me to donate 50 bucks and get a refund, and I always tell them that they’re being hypocritical and that I’ll do no such thing.
Sen. Kelley’s email is absurd. Pawlenty IS putting education first, by removing this program before cutting teachers. This sort of thing seems typical of this whole budget problem. Politicians will cry no matter what gets cut, because everything is someone’s pet project. Well, this program helped politicians more than anyone else, so I’m happy it got the axe before any further cuts in education.
Comment posted June 20, 2009 @ 2:03 pm
I don’t understand why the Governor can unilaterally zap this program authorized by law. It’s as though he is remaking State law, not just trimming back on public spending through unalotment. How is the Governor killing this program any different than if he said the State is no longer in the road maintenance business?
Comment posted June 20, 2009 @ 11:51 pm
First I am shocked that I would ever agree with Gov. Palenty. Second I had no idea I could write these contributions off. I will definitely get some cash back from that.
Comment posted June 21, 2009 @ 11:30 am
Get ready for even more special interest big money and influence–even in local elections, with the elimination of this program. Think 42 million to Franken and Coleman was obsene? You have not seen anything yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment