Weeks after Dr. George Tiller was shot and killed in his Kansas church, the U.S. Senate is debating a resolution condemning violence against abortion providers. But abortion politics has made even the simple task of passing a resolution denouncing violence into a contentious battle. The words “reproductive health care” could be a deal breaker with some Republicans and anti-abortion senators.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar is a lead sponsor, along with Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., and Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., of a bill in the Senate condemning Tiller’s murder and use of violence for political ends.
The bill says that “acts of violence should never be used to prevent women from receiving reproductive health care.” The presence of those final three words has spurned anti-abortion forces to reject it saying that to vote for the bill is to “glorify” abortion.
And on Thursday, an anonymous Republican senator moved to use the rarely seen “secret hold,” preventing it from coming to a vote.
“What an encouragement to the pro-life community that while some Senators may vote in favor of abortion, they stand strongly against any effort to glorify it,” said Family Research Council president Tony Perkins in a statement. “Like us, they realize that just as violence cannot be tolerated, neither can any effort to exalt those who practice it against the unborn.”
“As a former prosecutor I have seen how acts of violence can tear apart communities,” Klobuchar said of the bill. “No matter how heated the debate or how great our differences, violence is never the answer.”
On the anonymous hold, she said, “Supporting a bipartisan bill that denounces the use of violence is basic common sense and we need to pass this without further delay.”
In a joint statement, Klobuchar, Boxer and Sheehan said they will not compromise on the wording saying, “condemning violence against women’s health care providers and agreeing not to use violence as a means of resolving differences are not objectionable viewpoints.”
The U.S. House unanimously passed a watered-down version on June 9 which condemned the murder of Tiller but also a half-dozen other murders that occurred in places of worship. It did not mention Tiller’s profession, the reason he was murdered or the terms “abortion” or “reproductive rights.”
Including Sens. Klobuchar, Boxer and Sheehan, the Senate version has 43 cosponsors.













10 Comments »
Pingback posted June 23, 2009 @ 12:31 pm
[...] U.S. Senate is Debating Resolution Condemning Violence Against Abortion Providers In the wake of Dr. George Tiller’s murder, the U.S. Senate is debating a resolution that condemns violence against abortion providers. The words "reproductive health care" are in the bill, causing Republicans and anti-abortion senators to oppose it, according to a Minnesota Independent article. [...]
Comment posted June 23, 2009 @ 2:46 pm
I reached the age of reason during WWII. I started reading newspapers during the same time. I find the average Republican for much of my life to have been among the most despicable persons I have ever known, And this is especially true when they are given a position of some authority.
Comment posted June 24, 2009 @ 2:58 am
I second the comments posted by Dr. William F. Harrison. The time has come for reason and common sense to trump the knee-jerk reactionary behavior that has become the norm of the average Republican Party member over the past few decades. In fact, that time is long overdue.
Comment posted June 24, 2009 @ 11:09 am
Tillers Assassination by Roeder was an act of Domestic Terrorism.
You would think that after a decade of instilling fear about Terror into the hearts and minds of Americans they would actually stand up to speak against it. Turns out that legal abortions are more of a threat to these hypocrite Republicans that Terrorism.
Comment posted June 24, 2009 @ 12:14 pm
What a waste of time, a resolution does nothing. Why do people even care about this?
Comment posted June 24, 2009 @ 1:27 pm
Tiller’s murder was atrocious, plain and simply an act of terror. Roeder should rot in prison for his cowardly act. But what of the ten thousand fetuses (near-term babies for those of us with a heart) that Tiller killed? Shedding any crocodile tears for them? Might be legal, doesn’t make it conscionable.
How’s that for knee-jerk reactionary behavior? And just what is reasonable and commonsensical about murdering viable babies a month or so before birth? How can anyone defend that? Amy? Anyone?
Pingback posted June 26, 2009 @ 5:59 pm
[...] senators are unwilling to go on record as opposing violence against [...]
Comment posted June 26, 2009 @ 6:35 pm
staticnoise
Comment posted June 24, 2009 @ 1:27 pm Tiller’s murder was atrocious, plain and simply an act of terror. Roeder should rot in prison for his cowardly act. But what of the ten thousand fetuses (near-term babies for those of us with a heart) that Tiller killed? Shedding any crocodile tears for them? Might be legal, doesn’t make it conscionable.
How’s that for knee-jerk reactionary behavior? And just what is reasonable and commonsensical about murdering viable babies a month or so before birth? How can anyone defend that? Amy? Anyone?
======================================================================
You slam a person because he performed a legal LEGAL procedure on a ADULT! So pinhead when have you given men condoms? Took a girl to get the pill? Or in that fact tell kids where they come from really instead of cabbage patches? This has been decided years ago but you clowns demonize lie twist and run your damn mouth when at the end of the day it has NOTHING to do with you. What about the woman who took her body in, what should happen to her? Should she be shot too? WQhat about the clown who knocked her up, should he be shot in a church too? Keep you nose out of other peoples business, worry about you own!
Comment posted June 27, 2009 @ 2:23 am
“And just what is reasonable and commonsensical about murdering viable babies a month or so before birth?”
Don’t bully us with your fact-free, inflammatory language. “Viable babies” are not being “murdered.” The laws do not allow it. What happens is even more disturbing: families are faced with the horrible news that their baby is dead in the womb, or worse, has no chance to live when born.
Your very language tells me I don’t want you anywhere near my family or its health decisions.
Pingback posted July 1, 2009 @ 9:37 am
[...] you believe this news story? Republicans are actually blocking a bill that condemns murder! It is hard for me to see how this [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment