Comments on: RNC’s Steele ‘deeply disappointed’ by court ruling, Coleman concession

By: Tim

Tim — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:23:14 +0000

Ah, Mr. Steele, where is a good activist Supreme Court when you need it? One that will throw out the current law and rule whatever they think is right at the moment. I thought you were against that, but maybe I was wrong……………………..

By: Ted Gonzalez

Ted Gonzalez — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:45:44 +0000

Uncle ‘Tom’ Steele knows exactly nothing about MN election law. The votes cast were deemed outside the legal framework and were not counted. Absentee voting in MN is a priveledge, not a right. With that priveledge comes the duty to read the instructions and fill out the ballot and do so within the guidelines. If this is not done, the vote doesn’t count. Not effing rocket science.

By: More on Coleman and Franken - Call Me GOP

More on Coleman and Franken - Call Me GOP — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:50:17 +0000

[...] andrea on Jul.01, 2009, under Week 2 The Minnesota Independent reports that Michael Steele is “deeply disappointed” about Norm Coleman’s concession. Is this [...]

By: Lazercat

Lazercat — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:32:52 +0000

Now he knows how we felt for the last eight years.

By: EK

EK — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:34:10 +0000

Michael Steele is not qualified to discuss Minnesota Law.

It’s gratifying to see how much money the RNC urinated away fighting a losing battle against Franken. I imagine there were republican candidates behind the scenes who were applying pressure to Steele and his cronies, complaining that dollars were being siphoned away for this lost cause, at the expense of others who will be fighting to keep their jobs in the House and Senate in 2010.

By: thomas

thomas — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:08:44 +0000

Does Steele keep his job or does it go to Norm?