Peterson, Oberstar to bail on abortion-inclusive health care plan

By Andy Birkey
Thursday, July 02, 2009 at 10:54 am

oberstarPetersonReps. Jim Oberstar and Collin Peterson joined 17 other Democrats in threatening to vote against health care reform if a government plan covers abortion. In a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi late last week, the coalition said, “[W]e cannot support any health care reform proposal unless it explicitly excludes abortion from the scope of any government-defined or subsidized health insurance plan.”

As part of the “public option” in the health reform package currently being debated in Washington, a Health Benefits Advisory Committee would make decisions about what health care procedures can be covered under a government-run system. The anti-abortion Democrats want specific legislation that prevents that board from allowing coverage of abortion services.

Full text of the letter:

Dear Honorable Pelosi:

As the debate on health care reform continues and legislation is produced, it is imperative that the issue of abortion not be overlooked. Plans to mandate coverage for abortions, either directly or indirectly is unacceptable.

We believe in a culture that supports and respects the right to life and is dedicated to the protection and preservation of families. Therefore, we cannot support any health care reform proposal unless it explicitly excludes abortion from the scope of any government-defined or subsidized health insurance plan. We believe that a government-defined or subsidized health insurance plan, should not be used to fund abortion.

Furthermore, we want to ensure that the Health Benefits Advisory Committee cannot recommend abortion services be included under covered benefits or as part of a benefits package. Without an explicit exclusion, abortion could be included in a government subsidized health care plan under general health care. The health care reform package produced by Congress will be landmark, and with legislation as important as this, abortion must be addressed clearly in the bill text.
Furthermore, funding restrictions save lives by reducing the number of abortions. The Guttmacher Policy Review, a leading pro-choice research organization noted “that about one third of women who would have had an abortion if support were available carried their pregnancies to term when the abortion fund was unavailable.”

Thank you for taking the time to consider our request. By ensuring that abortions are not funded through any health care reform package, we will take this controversial issue off the table so that Congress can focus on crafting a broadly-supported health care reform bill.

Sincerely,

Dan Boren (Okla.), Bobby Bright (Ala.), Travis Childers (Miss.), Jerry Costello (Ill.), Kathy Dahlkemper (Penn.), Lincoln Davis (Tenn.), Steve Driehaus (Ohio), Tim Holden (Penn.), Paul Kanjorski (Penn.), Marcy Kaptur (Ohio), Mike McIntyre (N.C.), Charlie Melancon (La.), John Murtha (Penn.), Jim Oberstar (Minn.), Solomon Ortiz (Texas), Collin Peterson (Minn.), Heath Shuler (N.C.), Bart Stupak (Mich.), and Gene Taylor (Miss).

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Comments

5 Comments

uggh
Comment posted July 2, 2009 @ 11:24 am

Letter should read:
Dear Pelosi,

We need more troops to fight our wars to make our buddies rich. We cannot afford to lose one future soldier to abortion. We have no idea how to pay for the social services these “precious” lives will need in the future, but we have allies like Tim Pawlenty who will cut them regardless, so not our problem.

Signed,

Crooked, Special-Interest-Pandering Legislators


Tim
Comment posted July 2, 2009 @ 11:42 am

As a Jehovah Witness, I am opposed to the funding of any blood transfusions or usage of plasma. As a Christian Scientist, I am opposed to the funding of any drugs or, really, any medicine other than CS Practitioners. As a Scientologist, I am against funding of any treatment for depression or brain illness, as it is really all in your head, if you know what I mean. As an Old Testament bible thumper, I am opposed to the funding of any AIDS treatment since it is the sodomites own fault that they got this, except for the ones who got it from past blood transfusions in which case see my first sentence above.


jimbo
Comment posted July 2, 2009 @ 12:30 pm

women who choose to abort their fetuses rather than carry them to term should get a tax credit, especially if it’s not going to be covered.


Mplsmom
Comment posted July 2, 2009 @ 1:44 pm

I look forward to a day when our political leaders trust women. They are truly cowards.


Sheri
Comment posted August 25, 2009 @ 6:29 pm

Amen to all the above posts – especially Tim’s. Where does it stop? And yet, the conservativs are claiming Obama will take freedoms away – what are they trying to do?? I loved it when Michelle Backman made the statement that she wanted the government to keep their hands off her body (referring to health-care-reform;-) Isn’t that what pro-chouce is all about? Is Michelle Bachman suddently pro-choice? ;-)


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.