A senator asking Sonia Sotomayor about her diabetes wouldn’t be out of line, an expert on the disease says.
The judge’s grilling has mostly been about the law, but should Sotomayor’s interrogators stray into matters of her personal health, they would be justified, according to Dr. Richard M. Bergenstal, president-elect of the American Diabetes Association and director of the International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet Hospital.
“It could be debated that it’s anyone’s business,” Bergenstal told the Minnesota Independent in an interview shortly after her nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Still, he said, “I think it’s fair to look at someone’s health history where you’re counting on them for the long term.”
Sotomayor contracted Type I diabetes as a child. It’s the less common form of the disease, unrelated to hereditary factors or lifestyle. That’s different from Type II diabetes, which can be brought on by lifestyle and physical conditions.
“With Type I diabetes, the general numbers would say that on average, there’s some shortening on someone’s lifespan, five to seven years,” Bergenstal said.
“Half do better, half do worse. The half who do better are those who pay attention [to their health],” he said. “A person with [Sotomayor's background] is probably in that better half.”
Having diabetes might even inform Sotomayor’s performance on the bench.
“Type I diabetes is a chronic condition. It makes you face illness and death a little differently,” Bergenstal said. “It adds some discipline to your life that probably carries over to [other areas of] your life.”
Minnesota’s top state official for diabetes, Dr. Gisele Bouroncle, agrees.
“Judges interpret the laws. They’re not there to set policy or implement policy,” Bouroncle said. “But I suppose people bring perspective [to the court, such as] understanding the importance of access to health care.
“It’s such a demanding disease,” according to Bouroncle. It can be especially hard for a child, who may feel like an outcast, to deal with, she said.
Adults like Sotomayor gain an understanding of “what it is like living with a disease that has to be addressed every day of your life,” she added.
That includes, for example, careful, daily monitoring of one’s own blood sugar — as well as advocating for one’s own medical needs, sometimes in inhospitable situations.
Law enforcement is one area where greater understanding about diabetes is needed, Bouroncle said. At correctional facilities, consequences can be serious when “low blood sugar can be misinterpreted [if prisoners become] confused or combative, or lose consciousness.”
If she’s confirmed, Sotomayor “could bring a lot of visibility and attention to diabetes,” Bouroncle said.
Indeed, Bergenstal said celebrities with the disease — actors, a Jonas brother, a Miss America — “put a face to a condition.”
Even without doing anything beyond acknowledging that she has it, he said, Sotomayor helps the cause, by demonstrating that “a person dedicated to being involved in their diabetes management can have a … full life.”
As for whether Sotomayor could serve as a spokesperson, he said, “certainly we would welcome any interaction … if she’s comfortable with it.”












8 Comments »
Comment posted July 15, 2009 @ 10:45 am
Personal medical information is NOT fair game for public discussion. How would you like it if I took your medical records and posted them for all the world to see? WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! And I do not care if it is a Judge, a Presidential candidate, or a clerk at City Hall. Just because you are a potential public employee does not make this right.
Comment posted July 15, 2009 @ 11:04 am
T-Paw Is A Jerk has spoken!
So McCain’s health problems as wannabe Commander in Chief should’ve been off limits? And a lifetime SCOTUS’ appointee’s illness isn’t fair game for even asking questions about? Interesting.
Comment posted July 15, 2009 @ 12:24 pm
God we live in an amazing country – this woman over came a disease, being Puerto Rican, being raised by a single parent, and being a woman to be considered for one of the greatest jobs ever.
Why is she not a presidential candidate and why is she being subjected to the bigoted and racist jibes and jabs of lesser men like Sessions and Kyl and Grahamn?
I am amazed and awed by this person.
Comment posted July 15, 2009 @ 5:59 pm
I disagree with Dr. Bergenstal’s opinion given the Americans with Disabilities Act. It would be interesting to see how she handles those illegal inquiries if they do take place. The focus really should be on her qualifications – and nothing more.
Comment posted July 20, 2009 @ 12:26 pm
I’m torn. As a diabetic, I know I’d be miffed to say the least if a potential employer asked me if I had any pre-existing medical conditions. Given the lifetime appointment of the SCOTUS, however, I think it is a legitimate issue to bring up. However, to include it in any questioning during the confirmation hearings is not right. Any medical records the panel needs are available to them. Only if there is evidence that her disease is out of control should it warrant any questioning along those lines.
Comment posted July 28, 2009 @ 4:54 am
I agree that diabetes, if not taken care of can cause lot of problems.
And I hope that Sonia Sotomayor will take measures to create awareness to people about diabetes.
As a caregiver, I would like to share a few myths about diabetes that most of us are not aware of (I found the information in http://www.caring.com/diabetes) :
Myth 1. People with diabetes can’t eat anything sweet
Myth 2. Eating too much sugar causes diabetes
Myth 3. People with diabetes must eat a special diet
Myth 4. You can catch diabetes from someone else
Myth 5. There’s only one dangerous kind of diabetes
Myth 6. Only people with diabetes need insulin
Myth 7. Nothing can be done to prevent diabetes complications
Myth 8. Only overweight people get diabetes
Myth 9. People with diabetes shouldn’t exercise
Myth 10. People who follow their treatment plan never have high blood sugar readings
Myth 11. It’s possible to have “just a touch” or “a little” diabetes
Myth 12. People diagnosed with diabetes are doomed
With a little help and support from family or friends and the assistance of a good healthcare team, it’s possible to live a full and fulfilling life even with a diabetes diagnosis.
This clearly shows what Sonia Sotomayor was talking about “full life”.
Cheers!!!
Joe
Comment posted August 4, 2009 @ 5:13 am
If she managed to make it through law school and all the way to judge it hardly seems like the condition has been a liability. The likelihood that ANY nominee will have a LONG and productive life really has nothing to do with medical history. A SCOTUS can slip on an icy sidewalk or get in a car accident or have a stroke at any age just like the rest of us. Projected lifespan or the likelihood that a person will just go bonkers after they’ve lived to a certain age is really unforeseeable whether you have diabetes or not. Everybody has a crazy old aunt somewhere in the family tree or some familial quirk that might shorten a lifespan, or make it unusually long. Medical history is only one factor of the crapshoot we call life and really shouldn’t be a factor of deciding if a person can do their job well.
Comment posted August 7, 2009 @ 2:00 am
This nomination is about partisan politics under the guise of gender and culture. The Democrats filibustered Miguel Estrada a highly qualified Hispanic, for the court of appeals. Democrats cheer leftist identity candidates and jeer conservative minority candidates. Clarence Thomas received a similar treatment.Sotomayor represents the leftist policies perfectly: strong supporter of racial preferences, judicial activist, and member of the racist, La Raza organization. Democrats are not against discrimination. They favor discrimination as long as they are the ones discriminating.Congratulations to the Democrats. You have nominated a biased judge who will reliably set policies from the bench.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment