<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor questioned on Minnesota gay-marriage decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/39464/sotomayor-questioned-on-minnesota-gay-marriage-decision/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/39464/sotomayor-questioned-on-minnesota-gay-marriage-decision</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/39464/sotomayor-questioned-on-minnesota-gay-marriage-decision/comment-page-1#comment-33895</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=39464#comment-33895</guid>
		<description>I believe that if the precedent has been set already and it has been said that it does NOT break any Constitutional law, it is one that should be respected and followed just like any other binding precedent that the court uses to rule. It should not be considered void or overlooked because of the opinions of those who disagree with it. What was law then is still law now. the Constitution has not changed and it is not right to change the rules to a game you are already playing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that if the precedent has been set already and it has been said that it does NOT break any Constitutional law, it is one that should be respected and followed just like any other binding precedent that the court uses to rule. It should not be considered void or overlooked because of the opinions of those who disagree with it. What was law then is still law now. the Constitution has not changed and it is not right to change the rules to a game you are already playing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinkingabovemypaygrade</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/39464/sotomayor-questioned-on-minnesota-gay-marriage-decision/comment-page-1#comment-33894</link>
		<dc:creator>thinkingabovemypaygrade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=39464#comment-33894</guid>
		<description>Will anyone be surprised if Sotomayor carries forth all sorts of new, fashionable ideas about abortion on demand, marriage, truth...?

It&#039;s called (in language of our grandparents) following &quot;the spirit of the age&quot;.

And it&#039;s a mostly BAD spirit. No real tests for truth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will anyone be surprised if Sotomayor carries forth all sorts of new, fashionable ideas about abortion on demand, marriage, truth&#8230;?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s called (in language of our grandparents) following &#8220;the spirit of the age&#8221;.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s a mostly BAD spirit. No real tests for truth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media. » Sotomayor &#8230; - Himanchals Org.</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/39464/sotomayor-questioned-on-minnesota-gay-marriage-decision/comment-page-1#comment-33875</link>
		<dc:creator>Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media. » Sotomayor &#8230; - Himanchals Org.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=39464#comment-33875</guid>
		<description>[...] post: Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media. » Sotomayor &#8230;    :actually-mentioning, area, bullock, chuck-grassley, human-activity, Marriage, sonia-sotomayor, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media. » Sotomayor &#8230;    :actually-mentioning, area, bullock, chuck-grassley, human-activity, Marriage, sonia-sotomayor, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

