Comments on: Ellison, Walz sign on to Net neutrality bill http://minnesotaindependent.com/3954/ellison-walz-sign-on-to-net-neutrality-bill News. Politics. Media. Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:48:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Minnesota Central http://minnesotaindependent.com/3954/ellison-walz-sign-on-to-net-neutrality-bill/comment-page-1#comment-7663 Minnesota Central Tue, 20 May 2008 00:57:18 +0000 http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=3954#comment-7663 <strong>Legislation needed due to FCC failure</strong> This is not only about Net Neutrality, but also about Bush's quasi-legislative powers through the FCC.  Markey introduced similar legislation in the last session, but the Republicans blocked it in committee.  Walz spoke out in favor of net neutrality in his campaign against Gutknecht as Gutknecht was the sub-committee chairman on communications (and the recipient of a lot of donations.) I blogged about this then <a href="http://minnesotacentral.blogspot.com/2006/10/gutknecht-negative-ad-illustrates.html">http://minnesotacent...</a><p><br>Last June, the FCC ruled that there was little reason to protect consumers and content providers from attempts by large telecommunications providers to charge more for faster delivery.</p><p><br>The Senate already has legislation (S. 215) on this issue but thus far neither Coleman nor Klobuchar has signed on.  Obama and Clinton are co-sponsors and I recall that Obama discussed this issue in one of the debates as well as in stump speeches.</p> Legislation needed due to FCC failure This is not only about Net Neutrality, but also about Bush's quasi-legislative powers through the FCC.  Markey introduced similar legislation in the last session, but the Republicans blocked it in committee.  Walz spoke out in favor of net neutrality in his campaign against Gutknecht as Gutknecht was the sub-committee chairman on communications (and the recipient of a lot of donations.) I blogged about this then http://minnesotacent…

Last June, the FCC ruled that there was little reason to protect consumers and content providers from attempts by large telecommunications providers to charge more for faster delivery.

The Senate already has legislation (S. 215) on this issue but thus far neither Coleman nor Klobuchar has signed on.  Obama and Clinton are co-sponsors and I recall that Obama discussed this issue in one of the debates as well as in stump speeches.

]]> By: Minnesota Central http://minnesotaindependent.com/3954/ellison-walz-sign-on-to-net-neutrality-bill/comment-page-1#comment-4559 Minnesota Central Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=3954#comment-4559 <strong>Legislation needed due to FCC failure</strong> This is not only about Net Neutrality, but also about Bush's quasi-legislative powers through the FCC.  Markey introduced similar legislation in the last session, but the Republicans blocked it in committee.  Walz spoke out in favor of net neutrality in his campaign against Gutknecht as Gutknecht was the sub-committee chairman on communications (and the recipient of a lot of donations.) I blogged about this then <a href="http://minnesotacentral.blogspot.com/2006/10/gutknecht-negative-ad-illustrates.html">http://minnesotacent...</a><p> Last June, the FCC ruled that there was little reason to protect consumers and content providers from attempts by large telecommunications providers to charge more for faster delivery.<p> The Senate already has legislation (S. 215) on this issue but thus far neither Coleman nor Klobuchar has signed on.  Obama and Clinton are co-sponsors and I recall that Obama discussed this issue in one of the debates as well as in stump speeches. Legislation needed due to FCC failure This is not only about Net Neutrality, but also about Bush’s quasi-legislative powers through the FCC.  Markey introduced similar legislation in the last session, but the Republicans blocked it in committee.  Walz spoke out in favor of net neutrality in his campaign against Gutknecht as Gutknecht was the sub-committee chairman on communications (and the recipient of a lot of donations.) I blogged about this then http://minnesotacent…

Last June, the FCC ruled that there was little reason to protect consumers and content providers from attempts by large telecommunications providers to charge more for faster delivery.

The Senate already has legislation (S. 215) on this issue but thus far neither Coleman nor Klobuchar has signed on.  Obama and Clinton are co-sponsors and I recall that Obama discussed this issue in one of the debates as well as in stump speeches.

]]>