<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pawlenty named GOP &#8220;star&#8221; like Jindal &#8230; and possible john like Spitzer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/39731/pawlenty-jindal-spitzer-barbour-stars/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/39731/pawlenty-jindal-spitzer-barbour-stars</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:22:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: capitolcitymuser</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/39731/pawlenty-jindal-spitzer-barbour-stars/comment-page-1#comment-33968</link>
		<dc:creator>capitolcitymuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=39731#comment-33968</guid>
		<description>I know that Minnesota Independent does not like Pawlenty much.  I don’t either.

But there were 49 other governors beside Spitzer.  Even if we rule out the women [and who says we can?] there are others whom the woman mentioned thought were governors [and even may have been or have once been].

If that is all you have upon which to base the speculation, why broadcast the speculation?

Wait until [if it ever happens] you have something more to go on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that Minnesota Independent does not like Pawlenty much.  I don’t either.</p>
<p>But there were 49 other governors beside Spitzer.  Even if we rule out the women [and who says we can?] there are others whom the woman mentioned thought were governors [and even may have been or have once been].</p>
<p>If that is all you have upon which to base the speculation, why broadcast the speculation?</p>
<p>Wait until [if it ever happens] you have something more to go on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Responsiblity</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/39731/pawlenty-jindal-spitzer-barbour-stars/comment-page-1#comment-33916</link>
		<dc:creator>Responsiblity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=39731#comment-33916</guid>
		<description>Pawlenty should have been doing his duty as a Governor and bring the National Guard home right now, instead of using the visit to bolster his campaign for Prez. 

It is against the constitution that the Guard is being used in Iraq.  The blood of those soldiers and the upcoming deaths are on the Governor&#039;s hands as wells as the State Representatives who refused to author and sign a bill demanding our MN National Guard to come home and stay home. 

We had a protest in Jan to keep the troops home.  

Here is a letter from that protest. 
Below is the letter the group sent to Governor Pawlenty:

 

Dear Governor Pawlenty,



It recently came to our attention that on February 13, more than one 
thousand Minnesota National Guard troops will be mobilized to go to 
Iraq. This deployment occurs even as there are plans for the U.S. 
military to start drawing down the number of U.S. troops in Iraq.



We are very concerned about the deployment of these troops. The 
people of Minnesota, the people of the U.S. and the people of Iraq 
want an end to the U.S. war and occupation, not an endless 
continuation of U.S. military involvement. These National Guard 
deployments will prolong an unpopular war and occupation, cost 
millions of dollars, and cause great hardships to the Minnesota 
families and communities involved. 



The President may only call the Guard into National Service after 
Congress has granted him/her that authority; otherwise the Guard 
remains under the command of state officials. The October 2002 
Authorization to Use Military Force in Iraq (2002 AUMF) was the act 
of Congress under which National Guard call ups for deployment to 
Iraq have occurred. It states that the President is authorized to 
use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be 
necessary and appropriate in order to 1) defend the national security 
of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq and 
2) enforce all relevant UN Security Council resolutions regarding 
Iraq. Iraq does not pose a threat to the security of the United 
States or the region and the UN Security Council Resolutions on which 
the 2002 AUMF are based are no longer relevant. In the absence of 
any authority to keep the State Guard in Federal service, the 
authority over them should revert back to the State. 



Therefore, the coalition is calling on you as the Governor of the 
state of Minnesota to 1) immediately pursue and exhaust every avenue 
to stop future deployment of Minnesota National Guard troops to Iraq, 
and 2) pursue and exhaust every avenue to bring Minnesota National 
Guard troops currently in Iraq home without delay.



Thank you in advance for your support. 



Sincerely,



Wes Davey, Iraq Veterans Against the War; Larry Johnson, Veterans for 
Peace; Mike Perkins, Military Families Speak Out; Mary Beaudoin, 
Women Against Military Madness; Meredith Aby, Anti-War Committee; 
Marie Braun, Twin Cities Peace Campaign-Focus on Iraq
***************************
Here is a link to that protest. 

http://the-uptake.groups.theuptake.org/en/videogalleryView/id/1709</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pawlenty should have been doing his duty as a Governor and bring the National Guard home right now, instead of using the visit to bolster his campaign for Prez. </p>
<p>It is against the constitution that the Guard is being used in Iraq.  The blood of those soldiers and the upcoming deaths are on the Governor&#8217;s hands as wells as the State Representatives who refused to author and sign a bill demanding our MN National Guard to come home and stay home. </p>
<p>We had a protest in Jan to keep the troops home.  </p>
<p>Here is a letter from that protest.<br />
Below is the letter the group sent to Governor Pawlenty:</p>
<p>Dear Governor Pawlenty,</p>
<p>It recently came to our attention that on February 13, more than one<br />
thousand Minnesota National Guard troops will be mobilized to go to<br />
Iraq. This deployment occurs even as there are plans for the U.S.<br />
military to start drawing down the number of U.S. troops in Iraq.</p>
<p>We are very concerned about the deployment of these troops. The<br />
people of Minnesota, the people of the U.S. and the people of Iraq<br />
want an end to the U.S. war and occupation, not an endless<br />
continuation of U.S. military involvement. These National Guard<br />
deployments will prolong an unpopular war and occupation, cost<br />
millions of dollars, and cause great hardships to the Minnesota<br />
families and communities involved. </p>
<p>The President may only call the Guard into National Service after<br />
Congress has granted him/her that authority; otherwise the Guard<br />
remains under the command of state officials. The October 2002<br />
Authorization to Use Military Force in Iraq (2002 AUMF) was the act<br />
of Congress under which National Guard call ups for deployment to<br />
Iraq have occurred. It states that the President is authorized to<br />
use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be<br />
necessary and appropriate in order to 1) defend the national security<br />
of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq and<br />
2) enforce all relevant UN Security Council resolutions regarding<br />
Iraq. Iraq does not pose a threat to the security of the United<br />
States or the region and the UN Security Council Resolutions on which<br />
the 2002 AUMF are based are no longer relevant. In the absence of<br />
any authority to keep the State Guard in Federal service, the<br />
authority over them should revert back to the State. </p>
<p>Therefore, the coalition is calling on you as the Governor of the<br />
state of Minnesota to 1) immediately pursue and exhaust every avenue<br />
to stop future deployment of Minnesota National Guard troops to Iraq,<br />
and 2) pursue and exhaust every avenue to bring Minnesota National<br />
Guard troops currently in Iraq home without delay.</p>
<p>Thank you in advance for your support. </p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Wes Davey, Iraq Veterans Against the War; Larry Johnson, Veterans for<br />
Peace; Mike Perkins, Military Families Speak Out; Mary Beaudoin,<br />
Women Against Military Madness; Meredith Aby, Anti-War Committee;<br />
Marie Braun, Twin Cities Peace Campaign-Focus on Iraq<br />
***************************<br />
Here is a link to that protest. </p>
<p><a href="http://the-uptake.groups.theuptake.org/en/videogalleryView/id/1709" rel="nofollow">http://the-uptake.groups.theuptake.org/en/videogalleryView/id/1709</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Pawlenty, rising GOP star, or client of high priced madams? &#171; wrightandleftreport</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/39731/pawlenty-jindal-spitzer-barbour-stars/comment-page-1#comment-33914</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Pawlenty, rising GOP star, or client of high priced madams? &#171; wrightandleftreport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=39731#comment-33914</guid>
		<description>[...] Tim Pawlenty by Matthew Wright   Pretty good piece on the governor of Minnesota Tim Pawlenty here. The governor seems to have the right temperament, smarts and Midwestern charm to serve him well in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tim Pawlenty by Matthew Wright   Pretty good piece on the governor of Minnesota Tim Pawlenty here. The governor seems to have the right temperament, smarts and Midwestern charm to serve him well in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
