Rep. Michele Bachmann is one of a handful of Congress members who have expressed concerns to Warner Brothers about the summer horror movie Orphan, set to be released in theaters on Friday. Bachmann and her colleagues said in a letter to the studio last week that the film’s portrayal of adopted children is harmful. The film has even prompted a boycott campaign by adoption advocates.
In a letter to Warner Brothers Chairman and CEO Barry M. Meyer, Sens. Mary Landrieu, D-La., Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and James Inhofe, R-Okla., and Reps. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., John Boozman, R-Ark., and Danny Davis, D-Ill., wrote that the film’s depiction of adopted children was inaccurate and destructive.
“[M]ost adoptive parents would take issue with the movie’s message that an adopted child is not ‘one’s own’ since the only distinction between biological and adopted children is how they came to be a member of a family,” said the letter signed by Bachmann, who this month was appointed to the Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute’s Advisory Board.
Particularly, the members of Congress objected to a line in the movie’s trailer: “It must be hard to love an adopted child as much as your own.”
Warner Brothers says they’ve removed that line.
The trailer:
Partial text of the letter sent to Warner Brothers:
While we understand the movie may be intended as a far-fetched thriller, its trailer contains images and messages about adopted youth that are inaccurate.
…While these children often come from troubled families, they have the ability to form healthy relationships, achieve in school and succeed in life when given the opportunity. Having met with hundreds of these young people as part of our advocacy for change, we can personally attest to how incredibly strong, loving, and promising they each are.
As almost any adoptive parent will tell you, the immediate sense of love and belonging that exists between a child and adoptive parents is on par in every way with the relationship formed between a parent and their biological child. Furthermore, most adoptive parents would take issue with the movie’s message that an adopted child is not ‘one’s own’ since the only distinction between biological and adopted children is how they came to be a member of a family.
Therefore, we encourage you to continue to take steps to help us in conveying the positive and more accurate messages about US foster children and orphans worldwide outlined above. We look forward to your continued partnership in advancing this important issue.













9 Comments »
Comment posted July 23, 2009 @ 4:10 pm
So if there is no difference, why does Bachmann never pass up an opportunity to draw a distinction between her “five biological children and 23 foster children?”
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLG_enUS309US309&q=%22five+biological+children+and+23+foster+children%22
Comment posted July 23, 2009 @ 4:52 pm
While there are more important things for Congress to do than jousting with artists exercising freedom of expression, at least Rep. Bachmann is on something reality-based. Better than her Census paranoia
Comment posted July 23, 2009 @ 10:34 pm
It’s a MOVIE!!!!!!! NOT real. If this is what she wants to run on, so be it.
Comment posted July 24, 2009 @ 7:32 am
As a dyed-in-the-wool liberal, I have to say: while not retreating an inch from the general proposition that Bachmann is as crazy as a rat in a coffee can, even a blind pig will turn up an acorn now and then.
Her objection to this is no less arguably legitimate than numerous objections I’ve seen folks from our side of the fence raise about various cultural artifacts. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. (If I can think of any other relevant folksy aphorisms, I’ll send them along later.)
Comment posted July 25, 2009 @ 6:26 pm
Good Job Jim,
I also find myself occasionally noting that Bachmann isn’t 100% wrong and it always makes me a little uneasy.
Comment posted July 28, 2009 @ 12:13 pm
This is ridiculous. I remember the days when every character in every movie wasn’t pre-supposed to be speaking as a representative of their race/social class, etc. This movie is nto a generalization about orphans, Sharon Stone and her ice pick were not a generalization abotu lesbians, Psycho was not a generalization about white men who have lost their mothers.
Comment posted August 14, 2009 @ 5:18 pm
This will make people go see the movie.
Comment posted August 15, 2009 @ 9:44 am
There have been plenty of movies about evil “natural” children. What a waste of Congress-peoples time. If you object to a movie, that’s fine. Don’t watch it!
Don’t try to make that choice for me!!!
Congress desperately needs to focus on the real problems that we face.
Perhaps they could spend a few minutes of their personal time to look up the meaning of FICTION.
Comment posted August 15, 2009 @ 6:12 pm
I’m adopted and I can’t wait to see this film. Seriously, Michelle Bachmann should worry about promoting adoption instead of looking trite and silly for boycotting a film. Boycotting a film only draws attention to it and makes more people want to see it. Haven’t they learned this by now?
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment