<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Avenue or bust? Central Corridor LRT route through U of M in dispute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/4023/washington-avenue-or-bust-central-corridor-lrt-route-through-u-of-m-in-dispute/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4023/washington-avenue-or-bust-central-corridor-lrt-route-through-u-of-m-in-dispute</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wabbit</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4023/washington-avenue-or-bust-central-corridor-lrt-route-through-u-of-m-in-dispute/comment-page-1#comment-9796</link>
		<dc:creator>wabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4023#comment-9796</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fifteen Percent&lt;/strong&gt; In the dueling PowerPoint presentations that made up the last CC Mgmt Cmt meeting, we had an assertion by the University that on both alignments about 15% of the engineering has been done.&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fifiteen percent?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;In other words, this is 15% fact and 85% guesswork after spending $25 million and spending about 20 years without changing the alignment or technology one bit (despite thousands of hours worth of &quot;input&quot;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;No wonder they missed the 1300 feet and $17 million.&#160; What else might they have missed?&#160; Say, has anyone see a study that shows, categorically, that the Washington Ave Bridge can indeed be made to carry LRT without spending a ton?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thought not.&#160; It&#039;s in the 85 percent.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fifteen Percent</strong> In the dueling PowerPoint presentations that made up the last CC Mgmt Cmt meeting, we had an assertion by the University that on both alignments about 15% of the engineering has been done.
<p>Fifiteen percent?</p>
<p>In other words, this is 15% fact and 85% guesswork after spending $25 million and spending about 20 years without changing the alignment or technology one bit (despite thousands of hours worth of &#8220;input&#8221;).</p>
<p>No wonder they missed the 1300 feet and $17 million.&nbsp; What else might they have missed?&nbsp; Say, has anyone see a study that shows, categorically, that the Washington Ave Bridge can indeed be made to carry LRT without spending a ton?</p>
<p>Thought not.&nbsp; It&#39;s in the 85 percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wabbit</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4023/washington-avenue-or-bust-central-corridor-lrt-route-through-u-of-m-in-dispute/comment-page-1#comment-4587</link>
		<dc:creator>wabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4023#comment-4587</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fifteen Percent&lt;/strong&gt; In the dueling PowerPoint presentations that made up the last CC Mgmt Cmt meeting, we had an assertion by the University that on both alignments about 15% of the engineering has been done.&lt;p&gt;
Fifiteen percent?&lt;p&gt;
In other words, this is 15% fact and 85% guesswork after spending $25 million and spending about 20 years without changing the alignment or technology one bit (despite thousands of hours worth of &quot;input&quot;).&lt;p&gt;
No wonder they missed the 1300 feet and $17 million.&#160; What else might they have missed?&#160; Say, has anyone see a study that shows, categorically, that the Washington Ave Bridge can indeed be made to carry LRT without spending a ton?&lt;p&gt;
Thought not.&#160; It&#039;s in the 85 percent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fifteen Percent</strong> In the dueling PowerPoint presentations that made up the last CC Mgmt Cmt meeting, we had an assertion by the University that on both alignments about 15% of the engineering has been done.
<p>
Fifiteen percent?</p>
<p>
In other words, this is 15% fact and 85% guesswork after spending $25 million and spending about 20 years without changing the alignment or technology one bit (despite thousands of hours worth of &#8220;input&#8221;).</p>
<p>
No wonder they missed the 1300 feet and $17 million.&nbsp; What else might they have missed?&nbsp; Say, has anyone see a study that shows, categorically, that the Washington Ave Bridge can indeed be made to carry LRT without spending a ton?</p>
<p>
Thought not.&nbsp; It&#8217;s in the 85 percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

