Comments on: Report: Militias on the rise, Bachmann stoking anti-government sentiment

By: Mark Gregory,, Koernke

Mark Gregory,, Koernke — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:09:48 +0000

Go to libertytreeradio for a better understanding of what is really going on across the country. There is much more going on and many good people organizing and preparing. Vote with your wallet and buy more ammo. Ne Copula Nobiscum.
MGK/GDW!

By: mr.outback

mr.outback — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:17:04 +0000

cold someone please tell me why is it that law abiding ,liberty loving, god fearing, tax paying americans just trying to bring this country back to constitutional order are being critized and demonized. i know many militia members that are some of the most respectful, true patriots that i have ever talked to, and it realy makes me sick to see the reports that link ” militia groups” to right wing, ‘ANTI- GOVERNMENT” TERRORIST. this is insane, mabe everytime we say fbi, atf,dhs,splc or us government we should say ati-constitution group.

By: max

max — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:36:08 +0000

southern poverty law center ? lol … this racists organization has no credibilty . nothing but a bunch of commies.

By: John

John — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:12:05 +0000

Anything coming out of the Southern Poverty Law Center should be taken with a LARGE grain of salt. Many a legitimate group , religious of political , has coming under scathing rebuke by this organization and most of a political motivated nature. The study they are foisting before us when scrutinized is nothing but a collection of web sites , eleven total, that they say represent a threat to or national security . Not one of the web sites has the DHS nor SPLC investigated concerning any real or perceived threat to the government. It all adds up to nothing more than fear mongering.

By: Bill Timmons

Bill Timmons — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:11:31 +0000

ZNOFOB,
Why don’t you man up and start commenting using your real name?

By: Rob

Rob — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:35:50 +0000

Western countries have a long history of hypocrisy in the use of force. Much of what politicians and generals call terrorism is actually counterterrorism, a reaction to military terrorism. Military terrorism has killed millions more civilans than non-state terrorism. When Rome invaded the Iberian penninsula they forced the “natives” to work in their own mines and send this back to Rome. To enslaved minds the Roman soldier was an object of fear and dread or terror. But who had introduced this form of terror to this area ? Rome. What options did Rome leave the natives to rid themselves of the Roman presence ? Only one, force. Lacking training and an army the natives attacked Roman columns which Roman soldiers no doubt considered terrorism. During Englands colonization period they considered force used by themselves benevolence, counterforce used by the natives they called terrorism. The United States politicians, media, and generals, routinely call attacks by what are irregular soldiers (guerrilla patriots) upon uniformed western soldiers who have invaded their countries, terrorism. As long as western countries use terrorism they will be attacked by counterterrorism. Non-state terrorism is not something that can be rounded up and formally defeated like a conventional army. Rob.

By: David Joseph DeGrio

David Joseph DeGrio — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:06:10 +0000

ZNOFOB said “Bachmann is not dangerous. Our “leaders” are.”

At least he acknowledges that Bachmann isn’t a leader.

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:41:22 +0000

“Dictate opinions”? And they’re commies… how? I assume it’s because their research doesn’t confirm your worldview.

By: ZNOFOB

ZNOFOB — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:53:17 +0000

And since when does the sothern poverty law center dictate any opinions other than they are a bunch of communists? Like so many here.

By: ZNOFOB

ZNOFOB — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:51:45 +0000

My concern is more along the lines of an out of control government overbearing its will upon we the people, who are more or less marginalized by the hegelian dialectic, which nobody here apparently wants to discuss. Bachmann is not dangerous. Our “leaders” are.

So, really, is the Constitution the law of the land or not?

THAT is what it really boils down to.