Media Monitor: McCain sued, RNC news crews trimmed
Friday, August 15, 2008 at 9:39 am
McCain sued: Musician Jackson Browne is suing John McCain, the Republican National Committee and the Ohio Republican Party for copyright infringement for using his song "Running on Empty" in a commercial. The suit, filed yesterday in a Los Angeles district court, seeks an injunction against the campaign for use of the song, plus damages. A longtime liberal activist (and recent $1,000 donor to Minnesota Senate candidate Al Franken) Browne was "incensed" by the unlicensed use. Said Browne’s lawyer: "It’s a copyright infringement lawsuit, pure and simple, but the fact that Sen. McCain has used this song in a hit-piece on Barack Obama is anathema to Jackson."
Budget cuts affect newspaper RNC coverage: Although 15,000 journalists and media people are expected to attend the Republican National Convention, Forbes is reporting that newspapers will be sending fewer reporters due to budget concerns. The well-known economic woes of the print-news industry along with a tight schedule — the Beijing Olympics being directly followed by the DNC and the RNC — means some papers will reduce convention staffing "by as much as 20%," according to Jerry Gallegos, superintendent of the House of Representatives’ daily press gallery, which handles newspapers’ convention credentials. Gannet is sending 34 reporters to St. Paul, Dow Jones will have 23, and the LA Times will send 15. Curiously, Forbes says we should rest assured that the event will remain well covered. Why? Because, among other reasons, 200 bloggers have been credentialed (Minnesota Independent not among them). Dubious proof, if you ask me.
2 Comments
Comment posted August 16, 2008 @ 1:29 pm
The real question is, why does any news organization send anyone to cover these bromide-filled snooze-a-thons, GOP or Dem? Both events are nothing but overly long, uninteresting infomercials for worn out hacks. Back in the day, when nominations were decided by greasy old Pols in smoke-filled back rooms, the conventions served as mild entertainment. Now, with the pre-arranged cheering sections, the pre-destined candidates and the applause signs that light up on cue, the two conventions have the pizazz of a funeral home. If the two parties want TV time and broadsheet coverage, let em’ buy it just like any advertising.
Comment posted August 16, 2008 @ 8:29 am
The real question is, why does any news organization send anyone to cover these bromide-filled snooze-a-thons, GOP or Dem? Both events are nothing but overly long, uninteresting infomercials for worn out hacks. Back in the day, when nominations were decided by greasy old Pols in smoke-filled back rooms, the conventions served as mild entertainment. Now, with the pre-arranged cheering sections, the pre-destined candidates and the applause signs that light up on cue, the two conventions have the pizazz of a funeral home. If the two parties want TV time and broadsheet coverage, let em' buy it just like any advertising.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






