U.S. Rep. Betty McCollum missed the commotion in her St. Paul office Friday, when nearly 100 “Tea Party” activists’ announced visit turned into a raucous reception-room rally against health care reform.
Travel — to her son’s wedding on Saturday — prevented the congresswoman from personally greeting her visitors.
They were met instead with decaf tea, sign-in sheets and a staff struggling to keep a semblance of order. “Kill the bill! Kill the bill!” the crowd bellowed, scaring a spaniel being carried in one activist’s arms.
The cacophonous scene got in-your-face at times. “All you do is yell at me. I still don’t have my rebuttal. Where’s your info? Rebut me!” one man demanded.
But for the most part it didn’t get physical. “Tell Betty to start getting on the ball,” said one woman, jabbing her finger at a passing McCollum aide. “No need to poke me,” the aide snapped. “There’s no need to touch me.”
One speaker defended the rabble’s babble: “Everybody treats this as a bad thing, but it’s not.” McCollum’s district director, Josh Straka, replied that he’d like to have an exchange and listen to the man’s views “but I can’t hear them.”
Another thing he couldn’t hear: Someone saying, “Sign up Jack Kevorkian as the new health czar.”
But you couldn’t miss another woman’s sign, which played on Barack Obama’s “Hope” logo: “NOPE to Health Care.” Her shirt sent a mixed message: “Socialism,” then a small American flag and below that the legend “Equal Opportunity Destroyer.”
At the same time, across town, it was a quieter scene as 10 health-reform protesters converged on U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison’s Minneapolis office.
But in St. Paul, even as McCollum’s crowd cleared, there wasn’t much let-up to the dust-up. A cluster of protesters outside the office suite detected a sinister plot in questions on the second page of sign-in sheets that staff had distributed.
“Did you see this? It’s a privacy release form. Why would she need that?” one woman wondered aloud. “Did she get your social security number?”
Another activist had a theory: “It’s Obama’s dissenters list.”
Actually, a McCollum staffer later told the Minnesota Independent, the questions are part of the standard constituent-services form that the office keeps at the ready for visitors — “since we are a constituent services office.”
Cleve Mesidor, McCollum’s communications director in Washington, D.C., conceded that the form wasn’t quite right for today’s visitors in St. Paul. But she explained, the prying questions are required under the Privacy Act of 1974 for all U.S. representatives like McCollum who provide certain constituent services.
The form might have been useful for any who wanted to put their money with their mouths were, Mesidor added. “If they wanted to un-enroll from [government] benefits like Medicare, Medicaid or veterans benefits, we’d have the form on the spot,” she said. “But none of them took us up on it.”
No one took up McCollum’s staff on the iced tea they had at the ready either – four pitchers were sat untouched on a coffee table at the end — maybe because it was decaf.
[Minnesota Independent video shot by Stefan Lund, edited by Paul Schmelzer.]
RELATED: Candidates mingled with office-crashers at ad hoc town hall














12 Comments »
Comment posted August 14, 2009 @ 7:00 pm
Nice to meet you, Chris.
BTW It’s Joshua Straka not Joe.
Jamie Delton
Comment posted August 14, 2009 @ 7:06 pm
It’s very important we oppose HR3200. Everyone at this meeting was very informed and most realized the importance of opposing HR3200.
Jamie Delton
Comment posted August 14, 2009 @ 11:54 pm
It looked like they were there to harass, not to say anything coherent or get questions answered. Didn’t these teabaggers have mothers who taught them manners?
Comment posted August 15, 2009 @ 10:11 am
For us who want medicare for all- the townhall crashers, patriots, whatever are amusing. In America there is freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom to seek redress of your greviances to the elected officials. I am also amused when the tea party folks(?) call the elected officials – socialists, they’re not and it is a stretch of the imagination to call McCollum, Obama, and whoever else that tag. They are moderate democrats and the socialists I know and represent deserve better then to be poured on with them.
Both sides need to be respectful in the debate, perhaps not always polite but respectful (there is a difference)
Comment posted August 15, 2009 @ 2:21 pm
All this uproar and uncertainty about a new health care program.
Why are we even talking about creating a whole new wheel here?
Why not just extend Medicare to the whole population?
We know what it is, how it works, and the administrative costs run
what – about 1.5%? (As opposed to 40% to 60% for our so-called
“system” of private insurance companies taking our premiums until
such time as we actually need coverage…)
Try taking Medicare away from those who have it. Heck, try
taking their health care system from Canadians, or the British.
The most ludicrous thing I’ve heard is the notion that someone
like Stephen Hawkings would never be allowed to live under
the British National Health service. As if he has ever lived
anywhere else, or would have been covered by any private
insurer here.
Another existing system in this country that works really well,
and is well-liked by the 13 million Americans already on it, is
Tri-Care, the coverage provided for dependents of active-duty
military personnel and retired military. Works fine, pays for
independent practitioners to provide needed services.
I am really having my doubts about this administration, though.
They’ve been ignoring us ever since they got elected, disregarding
those who doorknocked until their feet and knuckles were bloody.
No pardon for Don Siegelman. Backing off from gay rights.
Extending Secret Service coverage to a former Vice President
(never done before – ever). No prosecution for Karl Rove. Finding
new jobs for the people at Main Justice who politicized the
District Attorney positions all across the country (remember the
DAs who weren’t fired because they cooperated and pushed specious
criminal investigations against Democratic candidates?).
So now they want our help, in order to make Obama successful and
more popular. To what end? Where the heck is the leadership
we were hoping for?
Comment posted August 15, 2009 @ 2:21 pm
“It’s very important we oppose HR3200. Everyone at this meeting was very informed and most realized the importance of opposing HR3200.
Jamie Delton”
Why is it important to oppose something titled:”America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009″
I think I would like affordable heath choices.
Comment posted August 15, 2009 @ 3:49 pm
Dave –
I’ve been struggling with the same issues and I’ve come to the conclusion that we lied to ourselves. We so much wanted the Bushies/Cheneys/McCains of the world to be gone that we saw Barack as the cavalry coming over the hill. He isn’t and he never told us he was – he is a centerist, Chicago-pol. We thought he was more. And he isn’t. I am firmly convinced that our votes for him were the best thing for the country and I still believe it.
I think this is the same kind of disappointment and frustration a person feels on Christmas morning when the present you were hoping for – the BB gun or the Malibu Barbie – depending on a persons orientation – don’t appear under the tree. Let’s just hope that the gifts actually left under the tree move us closer to our goals.
Comment posted August 16, 2009 @ 1:10 pm
Sure was a lot of folks missing from High School Civics class when the discussion turned to consensus and compromise as elements in the American legislative process. How come the deathers are so convinced that no change is needed? How come they are against Health Insurance reform considering the bill has yet to be written?
Comment posted August 17, 2009 @ 9:51 am
If this didn’t stink of partisan games, I’d enjoy seeing people take their reps to task for once. But it just doesn’t seem genuine. Screaming for corporate board members to be in control of their health care seems to be a strange form of “Patriotism.” Has everyone’s memory become so short that the United Healthcares of the world and their indiscriminate spending and lavish monetary payouts to execs have already been forgotten? Corporatism is more palatable than socialism if the guise of choice is there it would seem.
Comment posted August 17, 2009 @ 11:54 am
Why have there been no new proposals on health care from Republicans (tax cuts, liability limitation, and individual savings accouts are not new proposals)? They have none, and that doesn;t matter. Their concern isn’t about health care reform, or even about preserving the status quo, it’s about trying to foist a failure on the Obama administration. When the demagogues whip people into a frenzy about the bill, understanding or even opposing what it calls for is unimportant. Health care just happens to be the issue of the moment, and if it’s a way to hand the President a defeat, so be it.
Comment posted August 17, 2009 @ 4:12 pm
It boggles my mind that there are people who would rather have private insurance who is more likely to not cover all of their claims and be denied coverage (i.e Blue Cross Blue Shields), and the be forced to work 2 or 3 more jobs to pay for his or her hefty medical bill. If those people want that kind of insurance, so be it however they should forfeit their rights to have access to Medicare, Medicaid, assistance from the VA (if he or she qualifies for it), and unemployment benefits.
Republicans may say Medicare and Medicaid is bankrupt but frankly I think it works. My parents are over 65 and are on a Medicare plan. My dad has so many health issues up the wazoo (part of it due to his diabetes). If it wasn’t for Medicare (i.e the government), my parents would be struggling to pay for all the doctor visits and operations my father had to get in recent years.
People say they are afraid of the government, well what about credit card companies who have all our personal information on us including our social security numbers, home/work addresses and phone numbers, etc…etc…? I’m more afraid of them than I am of the government because of my past run ins with some scary collection agencies from past credit card debts.
Last thing…a healthy debate between politicians and their constituents is a good thing. Harassing and intimidating politicians is not a good thing. I’m not sorry when I say that these town hall protests have proven to me that the term “ugly American” has never gone away and remains relevant as ever.
Comment posted August 19, 2009 @ 11:47 am
We cannot claim to be “the greatest nation”, if individuals are only concerned about their own.
Not being able to supply EVERYONE with adequate food and\or healthcare, (Basic Welfare) because you have may have these things is selfish and un-american.
This nation’s independence was fought against the “haves”, who refused to give up any personal wealth for the greater good of others.
As someone who has served this country in U.S. military for well over a decade…. I’m tired and disappointed at my fellow citizens’ “I’VE GOT MINE” attitude.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment