The “R” in “Rochester” no longer stands for “Republican”

By Leigh Pomeroy
Sunday, October 01, 2006 at 6:31 pm

Cross-posted at Vox Verax.

Two articles came out recently in the Rochester Post-Bulletin stating what many in the 1st Congressional District already know:

Rochester can no longer be counted on to deliver the Republican vote.

More…In an article entitled “Region’s GOP leanings no longer a given“, veteran Post-Bulletin political reporter Matt Stolle writes:

For decades, the Rochester area was considered reliably Republican territory, a region of GOP stalwarts who for decades loyally voted for the party of Lincoln. But two years ago, Rochester’s political foundations were shaken with the election of two Democrats, Tina Liebling and Andy Welti, to the Legislature. Suddenly, Rochester was an area very much in political play.

In a separate article on the same day entitled “Some say extremism cost GOP members“, he writes,

…longtime observers say the loss of political moderates within the area Republican Party has less to do with the party’s diminishment than the changing dynamics of the Rochester area itself. As Rochester has grown and diversified, particularly from an influx of minorities and immigrants, its political orientation has changed.

The reason for the change is not only the evolution of the city’s population, but the evolving nature of the national and statewide political scene. Stolle writes of Rochester resident Richard Hall, who

recently attended a rally for DFL senate candidate Amy Klobuchar, and as he scanned the room at Daube’s Bakery in Rochester, he couldn’t help but notice a political trend.

Many of the people there had once been Republicans.

Hall was in a position to know. A retired IBM engineer, Hall’s life in many ways had followed the same political arc as many of the 40 to 50 Rochester residents gathered in the bakery that day.

A one-time moderate Republican, Hall abandoned the GOP many years ago after it, in his opinion, went from being “fiscally conservative and socially liberal to socially conservative and fiscally out of control.”

Perhaps the critical turning point in the evolution of the political balance was in 2002, when Rochester Republicans turned their backs on party moderates and refused to endorse incumbent GOP State Senator Sheila Kiscaden. The popular Kiscaden ran on the Independence Party ticket and easily won reelection.

The Rochester Republicans were hoping to regain ground in 2004, but two of their incumbents, Carla Nelson and Bill Kuisle, were upset by newcomers Liebling and Welti, and another GOP stalwart, Fran Bradley, almost lost to Rochester school board member Kim Norton.

So what’s different in 2006?

  1. While the President’s approval ratings are down all over the country, they’re even lower in Minnesota

Categories & Tags: | | | | | |

Comments

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.