A Minneapolis man walking downtown Tuesday evening was assaulted by men whom witnesses say were part of the 35W bridge construction crew. While the victim was straight, he was attacked because the assailant thought he was gay.
Karl Aarsheim, 32, left the Minneapolis Eagle, a Washington Avenue gay bar, where he and his wife were meeting a friend for drinks Tuesday evening. On his walk home at around 11:30 p.m., several men in orange construction vests approached him. One of the men asked, "Are you a faggot?" Aarsheim replied, "No. And so what if I am?"
One of the men then assaulted Aarsheim. He was kicked in the head and neck, leaving swelling and bruising, and needed a number of stitches near his eye. The attacker was was detained by a group of young men on bicycles who happened by the scene.
The suspect, Otto Marin, was arrested in the assault but was released Wednesday after paying $40, Aarsheim’s sister-in-law Wendy Brovold told the Minnesota Independent. Marin’s probation officer also called Aarsheim to confirm the incident. When Flatiron Construction, the company hired by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, learned of the attack, they fired Marin, KSTP reported Wednesday evening.
Aarsheim’s wife, Nikki, was distraught over the attack. "This is my neighborhood and I don’t want these things to happen in Minneapolis. We want to bring this to the attention of as many people as we can." She continued, "I cannot believe that gay bashing still happens."
The Aarsheims are regular customers of the Washington Avenue bar Grumpy’s, whose manager said Marin and his accomplices have been thrown out of the bar twice for aggressive behavior.
Nikki’s sister Wendy Brovold was also furious about the assault, primarily because of the likelihood that it was perpetrated by a member of the construction crew rebuilding the collapsed 35W bridge.
"The primary attacker wore his crew jacket as he monstrously attacked an unarmed man, allowing everyone in Minneapolis to see what, exactly, the state was paying for," Brovold wrote in an email. "Moreover, we have reason to believe that at least one of these men is already on criminal probation."
The attack follows a similar incident in late June. A man was badly beaten at the intersection of 6th St. and Cedar Ave. after the suspect, Abdirizak Mohamed, asked the man if he was gay. When the man "proudly answered ‘yes,’" Mohamed hit him several times in the face and told the victim that he hated homosexuals.
In addition, a recent report showed a 135 percent increase in anti-LGBT violence in Minnesota in 2007.
Although the majority of attacks based on sexual orientation are committed against gays and lesbians, in Karl’s case, just the perception of being gay opened him up to brutal attack, an attack that has rightfully angered his family and raised concern in the community.
"This hate crime was paid for by the state of Minnesota," wrote Brovold referring to the suspects’ connection to the bridge repair work. "What I would like is media coverage, and I’m hoping people can help spread the word that this shit still happens."













14 Comments »
Comment posted August 16, 2008 @ 11:13 am
Still waiting on dezertbabe’s research. Please share with us your corrected version of the story.
Comment posted August 14, 2008 @ 7:06 pm
By all means, share your research, dezertbabe.
Comment posted August 14, 2008 @ 4:11 pm
First of all, the news reporters need to get their story srtraight. Half of this crap is bullshit and lies. Plus the police report and this article do not match up. So Basically u guys need to get ur facts straight and do more reasearch.
Comment posted August 14, 2008 @ 11:11 am
First of all, the news reporters need to get their story srtraight. Half of this crap is bullshit and lies. Plus the police report and this article do not match up. So Basically u guys need to get ur facts straight and do more reasearch.
Comment posted August 14, 2008 @ 2:06 pm
By all means, share your research, dezertbabe.
Comment posted August 16, 2008 @ 6:13 am
Still waiting on dezertbabe's research. Please share with us your corrected version of the story.
Comment posted August 25, 2008 @ 12:40 am
hello people i am one of the two guys who was involved in the so called brutal attacked that happend and this is my side. i was on my way back to our hotel after leaving the corner bar all three of us went into grumpies to apologize to the bartender when we left we walked by a man he had mentioned something to otto marin what he had said made him upset otto said to f off and we continued walking the man started yelling at us and came towards us i got fed up with him rambling on so i had hit him in the mouth . he droped to the floor and we were going to leave it at that. he had then gotten back up and came after me. i hit him again he fell so i walked away. i only took ten steps and i heard someone say look out i had then looked behind me to him runnning towards me. he jumped on me, i took him to the ground. otto had then kiked me in the back and told me to get up he went to kik me again i moved and he had accidently kiked the man in the head . thats what happend . by the way this is not dezert babe . it was a fair fight he lost . now that he wanted to go on tv about i had lost my job.
Comment posted August 25, 2008 @ 1:05 am
<not dezertbabe> i am dissapointed in the way things happend . i lost my job over a simple fight. i feel bad that the man received stitches. it was not intentional. but do to the fact the noone wants to hear the other side of the story two men who came out there all the way from california to be apart of the 35w had lost ther jobs and also put a damper on our career. Something that wasn't mentioned, was the fact that all of us involved including the man that got hurt was drunk . i just find it odd that he didnt remember much that happend but yet when he had a chance to get on the news he rememberd. I am not against gays, I have no bad feelings towards them, but just because he was at a gay bar that night it was atomatically deamed: as a gay bashing. Which is far from the truth. He opened his mouth first, Otto responded and it went from there. It had nothing to do with gender, sexuallity, race or age, it was a disagreement and it was settled as such. For all of you people who don't rememer how it was to disagree with someone, well TAKE A BREATH! People get into fights- get over it!!
Comment posted August 25, 2008 @ 1:32 am
The above stuff writen under my name is the true facts by my man, so read it. Theres the truth.
Comment posted September 2, 2008 @ 6:40 am
Don't get me wrong, this attacker sounds like a real jackass… but is it really fair to implicate the state in this one? All the State of Minnesota did was contract with a company to build a bridge, a company that apparently happened to hire a few jerks (which is unavoidable in a world that's full of 'em). The state couldn't have possibly foreseen that one specific person from this company would head down Washington Avenue and kick the shit out of someone (nor could it have *prevented* the behavior — they don't have the guy on puppet strings). (And I'm sure someone might argue that it was potentially foreseeable because the guy had a past criminal record, but do we really want to live in a world where a single transgression brands you and prevents you from ever getting a job again?)
This guy got fired from his job after the attack (which he damn well should, especially with clothes identifying him as part of the project), and he'll be facing criminal charges. (Not to mention, there's now a whole bar full of leathermen who'll make damn sure he never shows his face again!) He's getting his comeuppance — let's not spread the blame to others who don't deserve it, or we actually end up taking the responsibility for his disgusting crime off of him. (Not to mention, rhetorical hyperbole just helps the radical right continue to claim that those who work for tolerance of social minorities are angling for “special rights” – of course, we're NOT, and it sucks that the radical right would misuse a statement about a tragic event in such a fashion, but the simple fact is that the bastards will do it).
Comment posted September 2, 2008 @ 6:45 am
And dezertbabe, I don't think anyone's going to buy the argument that it's natural for disagreements to be settled by fighting — nor are they likely to be won over by the point that everyone involved was drunk. The drinking was voluntary, and assault is simply ILLEGAL any way you slice it, drunk or not. You might have clarified the motive, i.e. that it wasn't *meant* as a gay-bashing… but clarifying the motive does not excuse the events.
Comment posted September 2, 2008 @ 9:46 pm
The gay bashing reaction – probably cuased by handling too many hot rivets.
Comment posted September 2, 2008 @ 9:48 pm
Sound like “Brokeback Bridge”
Comment posted October 27, 2008 @ 12:25 pm
This is ricdiclosy how far this has gone, how peeople act like their monsters, their not. I mean if this incident had never happened, u just so happened to meet these guys u would think they were pretty nice people. This is ruining our lives, they guys can never get thier job back. Also one guy has lost his home,car. So I say we stop the verbal bashing to these men leave it alone. They have learned their lesson so now its time to move on.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment