Students, teachers and concerned residents of the Anoka-Hennepin School District crowded into the district’s board meeting on Monday evening to vent their concerns after learning that the district paid out $25,000 to a student who says he was continually harassed by two district teachers because they thought he was gay.
While the citizens voiced their frustration with the district, most gave concrete solutions for how the district could improve upon its policies and save face with the community on the issue of anti-gay harassment.
Alex Merritt says he endured taunting and harassment at the hands of his two teachers, Diane Cleveland and Walter Filson, during the 2007 school year, according to a complaint filed with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. The school acknowledged it disciplined the teachers only minimally, stating that laws governing tenure prevent them from doing more. Residents of the district say it’s not enough.
Peter Gokey, who teaches at a school in the district, said last night, “About this being an isolated incident… that isn’t the case.”
Gokey told stories about students and staff who have found the climate in the district hostile to gay staff and students. “It’s come a long way, but there’s still more work to be done, and what we can do is take a stand against harassment,” he said.
“I do know that Outfront Minnesota [a LGBT advocacy group] has offered training,” he said, urging the board to program in-service workshops on harassment. “It’s a chance to do some actual training on this issue. This is a chance to say let’s move forward.”
Lucas Stiles, a student at Blaine High School, said he understands that teachers might disagree about issues like same-sex marriage and homosexuality, but that can’t creep into the classroom.
“They have the right to their own opinion. They are allowed to not like who someone is sexually attracted to,” he said. “But it is not their right to make comments about it, to joke about it or tell other students that they are against it.”
Stiles said he suggested that perhaps the offending teachers sit in on some of the district’s Gay-Straight Alliance meetings to get to know some of the students who are affected by harassment.
“These students, whether they are gay or not, deserve protection,” said Minneapolis’ Steven Brusewitz, a former district employee and past president of the school employees’ association. “I find this really disturbing. I really have a hard time seeing how you can continue the employment of these individuals.”
Katrina Plotz, a Minneapolis resident, expressed her shocked by the allegations. “Any teacher who deliberately inflicts emotional harm on a student has no place in the classroom,” she said. “The fact that these teachers are still employed is shameful.”
A mother from Elk River gave emotional testimony about raising a gay son in the district. It wasn’t until he came out in college that he began to tell her about the painful harassment he endured as a teenager.
“Don’t get me wrong, he had a wonderful education,” she said. “But it breaks my heart as a parent to hear these things I am continually learning.
“I truly think we cannot effect change if we maintain that this is isolated incident,” she told the board. “I think we shut our eyes to the possibility of a better future if we maintain that this is an isolated incident.”
Those in attendance said they will continue to work with the district to ensure that incidents like the one experienced by Merritt will not happen again.
(Disclosure: I am a member, along with 1,200 other Minnesotans, of a Facebook group that helped coordinate Monday’s meeting with the school board.)














18 Comments »
Comment posted August 25, 2009 @ 12:56 pm
These teachers need to be fired. There is no excuse for their behavior.
Comment posted August 25, 2009 @ 1:37 pm
Morality indeed, Heterosexuals.
Morality indeed.
Comment posted August 25, 2009 @ 2:13 pm
when harassment happens its great that its faced openly, publicly. i’m 65 my son is gay. my mother and father were Lutherans. the church they went to was started by their preacher in a basement. the church grew until they needed a real building to worship in. the congregation grew even more so they built a modern church building that had several sunday morning services a week. after being their preacher for 25 years the members found out he was gay. they voted him out of his job, cold huh. i don’t think the good lutherans of los gatos ca. would do that today.
Comment posted August 25, 2009 @ 11:16 pm
Critical Questions:
Where are all of the other students who witnessed this – not one has come up in all of the media hype. Apparently there was one homosexual kid in one of the student’s classes – why hasn’t s/he filed a suit too? Or made a statement confirming the abuse happened?
Why did the school district settle? Why did the student settle for so little?
Cleveland has a lawyer who (according to the Pioneer Press anyway) is looking into wrongdoing by the State Human Rights department. What happened there?
How come the student didn’t sue the teachers?
How did these teachers go from winning awards to losing face?
I don’t want to defend the wrong group here, but really – why has ALL of this reporting gone on without so much as a critical question being asked? Are we THAT afraid of being labeled homophobic, that we can’t even ask “wait. What REALLY happened here”.
And, picking nits here: On your disclaimer – There are 1,336 people in the facebook group you list in your disclaimer (probably more than when you wrote this piece). Of those, 134 list locations clearly outside of Minnesota and 177 list no location at all. That’s 1,025 folks. You’re off by 17% I counted. (Don’t make me do your research for you) At BEST you can say 1,025 fellow Minnesotans (some of which only list companies, so they MAY be in the state). But accurately, you can only say about 930. Fewer if you say that you can’t be sure “Central High School” (and the like) is in Minnesota (there are many). That was just plain sloppy.
[Sorry for the ad hominem there at the end]
Comment posted August 26, 2009 @ 5:14 am
Apparently the spirit of this story is over Doug’s head, who also goes a little too far in trying to defend the actions of these teachers.
Comment posted August 26, 2009 @ 8:11 am
Doug,
The story said there was another student in the class who was gay. It didn’t say anything about whether that s/he was out of the closet. Back when I was in high school in the mid-70s there was another kid at school who was constantly harassed by students and teachers alike because they thought he was gay. Among other things, they slashed his tires. The thing was, this guy was straight. He was softspoken and handsome, and that’s all the proof that most people required – even though he was actively dating girls. This was assumed to be a dodge(!)
It turns out that his younger brother – the rugged, muscular, tough-as-an-old-boot pug-ugly athlete was the one who was gay; but almost nobody knew that. Why didn’t his younger brother speak up to stop the harassment? Well, that would have been like boiling the ocean.
Comment posted August 26, 2009 @ 8:55 am
I need to talk to someone. It is not just about gay issues with Anoka Hennepin School District. It is about “cover-ups” of staff behavior. I have a wealth of information.
Comment posted August 26, 2009 @ 8:57 am
Here’s contact info for all our staff, Mona: http://minnesotaindependent.com/contact-us
Comment posted August 26, 2009 @ 12:38 pm
I don’t think that firing these teachers is the correct thing to do. I also don’t think that how this situation was handled was the best for creating a safe environment for all students. However, this situation is complicated by the fact that the Teachers’ Union would be up in arms over strong disciplinary action. Additionally, I think we further the wrong agenda with punitive action against these teachers. Minds won’t change by removing these teachers from the district; it would just be moving the problem to another district. I don’t have a specific answer as to how to handle this situation, but calling for a dismissal seems over-reactionary and a passing of the buck. This is obviously an issue that needs to be taken up with the Unions, and there needs to possibly be legislation that pre-empts any action by the Union to prevent further consequences to this type of behavior.
Good to see Gokey speaking up on this. He’s a nice guy with his heart in the right place on many of these issues.
Comment posted August 26, 2009 @ 12:40 pm
Doug,
You’ve certainly got a lot of questions. Perhaps you should be attending these meetings to ask them rather than posting them on an internet website not connected to these proceedings. You may even find that there are already answers to nearly all of them from the materials provided therein.
Comment posted August 26, 2009 @ 6:17 pm
Matt StG, how is it over-reactionary to fire teachers for bullying and degrading a student repeatedly? This was not a mistake, or a one-time-thing, or a joke that was “insensitive.” This was deliberate and repeated harassment. The student was quoted in the Star Tribune saying that Cleveland would make fun of him before lunch and Filson would ridicule him for the same thing after lunch. This pair of teachers apparently used their lunchtime to collaborate on ways to humiliate him. They both commented on him having a “thing for older men” when he did a report on Ben Franklin. That is sexual harassment.
Another example: the law enforcement class was discussing an incident where someone was suposedly arrested for molesting a dead deer. A student said “Doesn’t that sound like something Alex would do?” Filson laughed and said “Yes, that does sound like something Alex would do.” Another very degrading example of sexual harassment. The kid asks to go to the bathroom, Cleveland makes a reference to foot-tapping Larry Craig.
Even if you remove the sexual orientation issue from the story, this was a pattern of comments, of a sexual nature, that were intended to degrade and humiliate…That is sexual harassment and should not be tolerated in school from TEACHERS.
Would you think these teachers should keep their jobs if they repeatedly made fun of a kid for being black, Jewish, or overweight? I hope not. Anyone making excuses for these teachers exposes their own homophobic bigotry.
Comment posted August 26, 2009 @ 6:24 pm
And by the way, firing them would NOT mean they would have to be moved to another district. They would just be done. I seriously doubt ANY other school district would be lining up to hire them.
And the teachers union won’t necessarily be a barrier to getting rid of them. There are people working to have them expelled from the union. The union has its own Code of Ethics that I have a feeling was violated here…
Comment posted August 27, 2009 @ 1:25 pm
Doug, where do you see a Pioneer Press story? All I see on their website is a comment from some yokel who says he’s heard that there is more to this story.
Comment posted September 1, 2009 @ 12:13 am
Brian,
What the fuck? You ask a critical question about the REPORTING and BOOM, I’ve gone too far “defending the teachers”?
Maybe you could read into the spririt of my post and see that the REPORTING SUCKS and this all seems odd to me.
Why only $25,000? Hell, there’s other cases like this that are settling for 40 times that (case in mind, the student WAS actually gay and got beat up too). Why not more? Why settle? Why not drag them through the mud? And if not Merritt, then another student who was victimized?
There were 60 kids in two classes that saw this (guessing on class size here, but grant me some leeway) and none of them have called a reporter? No reporter has contacted a student? Why not? Is everybody under a gag rule? Sure, the school and the staff won’t say anything. But the students? These teachers teach 4 classes a day, right? 120 students each = 240 students… you think this happened to one student in private? Is there something else her? Did these teachers have something else against the victim?
If *I* have questions, then what will the people who think this kind of behavior is okay be saying? They have some leverage here in the . Ignoring the oddities will not help anybody’s cause here. Figure out what the weaknesses in the case are and answer them. Reporters should be doing thing naturally – find the questions and ASK THEM. But reading the StarTribune piece and re-hashing it, then bashing anyone who asks a critical question about it is just being an idiot.
Comment posted September 1, 2009 @ 1:29 am
Doug,
“Why only $25,000?” Who cares? The point here is that these teacher’s made Alex Merritt’s life miserable. His family probably wanted to settle in order to move on with their lives and I think it’s safe to say that these teachers and the district ARE being dragged through the mud by the negative media attention (which they deserve).
If you have all these doubts about what happened, maybe you should go to the MN Dept of Human Rights website and read about the case yourself. It’s not hard to find. Here’s a quote from their site: “It should be noted that the school district’s OWN investigation identified witnesses who substantiated allegations that teachers Cleveland and Filson made regular “gay” jokes in the classroom, and did nothing to stop subsequent ‘homo and gay jokes’ by classmates, sometimes smiling and laughing after the students’ comments.”
So yes, the harassment did indeed happen. It’s not rumor or hearsay. Get over it. And not that it’s relevant, but STEP teachers teach 2 periods a day and have very small class sizes (like 10-15 kids). Cleveland and Filson were actually Alex’s only teachers at STEP. (Cleveland would make fun of him before lunch and Filson would joke about the same things after lunch.) And do you really find it unbelievable that none of the other students “called a reporter?” There is a very sad lack of people in the world who have the courage to stand up against authority figures who abuse people, especially when it’s not happening to them and when it IS happening to the gay kid (or kid perceived to be gay). If you’re surprised they’re not calling reporters, you clearly don’t know much about teenagers.
Thankfully Alex stood up for himself and people are supporting him now.
Comment posted September 1, 2009 @ 10:21 am
Singling out ANY student for ANY reason and bullying or demeaning that student in front of others should be grounds for dismissal. People who behave this way have no business in education.
Comment posted September 1, 2009 @ 1:51 pm
There are many “facts” about this case that trouble me. For instance, there was some little know information regarding an incident which took place the day before the allegations were made. The student in question violated a serious school policy and was referred by one of the teachers. The next day the student made said allegations. I get the feeling there is more to this story than what we are reading. If these allegations are true than my sympathy is with this child, if they are not, then I think a lot of apologies need to be made. I for one am holding off judgment until I know all the facts. I don’t think this story is over yet. I would respectfully think everyone would do the same.
Pingback posted September 5, 2009 @ 7:45 am
[...] Peter Gokey, who teaches at a school in the district, said last night, “About this being an isolated incident… that isn’t the case.” Full story. [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment