<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Tribune Teamsters vote no to contract concessions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/4289/star-tribune-teamsters-vote-no-to-contract-concessions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4289/star-tribune-teamsters-vote-no-to-contract-concessions</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james anderson</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4289/star-tribune-teamsters-vote-no-to-contract-concessions/comment-page-1#comment-12192</link>
		<dc:creator>james anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4289#comment-12192</guid>
		<description>I guess the Pressman had to learn the hard way now.
They shouldv&#039;e believed the hard working union leaders that 
tried to negotiate on their behalf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the Pressman had to learn the hard way now.<br />
They shouldv&#8217;e believed the hard working union leaders that<br />
tried to negotiate on their behalf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulschmelzer</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4289/star-tribune-teamsters-vote-no-to-contract-concessions/comment-page-1#comment-5942</link>
		<dc:creator>paulschmelzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4289#comment-5942</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Erik. &quot;Unequivocal&quot; is definitely too strong a word. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re right, Erik. &#8220;Unequivocal&#8221; is definitely too strong a word. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wabbit</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4289/star-tribune-teamsters-vote-no-to-contract-concessions/comment-page-1#comment-5941</link>
		<dc:creator>wabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4289#comment-5941</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what an &quot;unequivocal assurance that they have no intention&quot; means, but what Harte said is this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;We recently hired the Blackstone Group to help us evaluate alternatives to our current capital structure, but that hardly merits a conclusion that we are near bankruptcy.  In fact, Blackstone has substantial expertise in balance sheet restructurings through means other than statutory proceedings like bankruptcy.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There wasn&#039;t much of an assurance in this statement at all, only a denial that BK is inevitable.  BK is clearly still on the table unless there are other statements that he&#039;s made that were more adamant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This vote makes a filing more likely, since that is about the only way the Strib can force a change in contract without Teamster agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not sure what an &#8220;unequivocal assurance that they have no intention&#8221; means, but what Harte said is this:</p>
<p>&#8220;We recently hired the Blackstone Group to help us evaluate alternatives to our current capital structure, but that hardly merits a conclusion that we are near bankruptcy.  In fact, Blackstone has substantial expertise in balance sheet restructurings through means other than statutory proceedings like bankruptcy.&#8221;</p>
<p>There wasn&#39;t much of an assurance in this statement at all, only a denial that BK is inevitable.  BK is clearly still on the table unless there are other statements that he&#39;s made that were more adamant.</p>
<p>This vote makes a filing more likely, since that is about the only way the Strib can force a change in contract without Teamster agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulschmelzer</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4289/star-tribune-teamsters-vote-no-to-contract-concessions/comment-page-1#comment-4980</link>
		<dc:creator>paulschmelzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4289#comment-4980</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Erik. &quot;Unequivocal&quot; is definitely too strong a word. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Erik. &#8220;Unequivocal&#8221; is definitely too strong a word. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wabbit</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4289/star-tribune-teamsters-vote-no-to-contract-concessions/comment-page-1#comment-4981</link>
		<dc:creator>wabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4289#comment-4981</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what an &quot;unequivocal assurance that they have no intention&quot; means, but what Harte said is this:

&quot;We recently hired the Blackstone Group to help us evaluate alternatives to our current capital structure, but that hardly merits a conclusion that we are near bankruptcy.  In fact, Blackstone has substantial expertise in balance sheet restructurings through means other than statutory proceedings like bankruptcy.&quot;

There wasn&#039;t much of an assurance in this statement at all, only a denial that BK is inevitable.  BK is clearly still on the table unless there are other statements that he&#039;s made that were more adamant.

This vote makes a filing more likely, since that is about the only way the Strib can force a change in contract without Teamster agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what an &#8220;unequivocal assurance that they have no intention&#8221; means, but what Harte said is this:</p>
<p>&#8220;We recently hired the Blackstone Group to help us evaluate alternatives to our current capital structure, but that hardly merits a conclusion that we are near bankruptcy.  In fact, Blackstone has substantial expertise in balance sheet restructurings through means other than statutory proceedings like bankruptcy.&#8221;</p>
<p>There wasn&#8217;t much of an assurance in this statement at all, only a denial that BK is inevitable.  BK is clearly still on the table unless there are other statements that he&#8217;s made that were more adamant.</p>
<p>This vote makes a filing more likely, since that is about the only way the Strib can force a change in contract without Teamster agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

