The New York Observer has a brutal deconstruction of Al Franken’s Senate candidacy in today’s edition. Reporter Steve Kornacki compares the Democrat’s campaign to that of Oliver North, who lost a Senate race to scandal-plagued incumbent Chuck Robb in 1994 despite it being a landslide year for Republicans. Here’s the takeaway:
Now, 14 years later, it’s the Democrats of Minnesota who seem poised to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in just the same style.
Norm Coleman, a Republican who was elected to the Senate in something of a fluke in 2002, is up for re-election. The state, which has voted Democratic in the last eight presidential elections (the longest current streak in the nation), played footsy with the G.O.P. for a few years earlier this decade but has lately rejected Bush-ism and returned to its Democratic roots. The party overwhelmingly won an open Senate seat in 2006 and Barack Obama has enjoyed mostly robust leads in polling.
Meanwhile, Coleman, whose narrow ’02 win owed itself to that year’s national G.O.P. tide and the peculiar politics surrounding the funeral of Paul Wellstone (which Democrats were accused of turning into a political rally) has suffered for his close association with George W. Bush, the Iraq war, and the national Republican Party. He’s hardly a beloved figure in Minnesota, his approval ratings have sagged for several years now, and a Democratic tide every bit as powerful as the one seen in 2006 is shaping up at the Congressional level this fall. In a year when they are poised to compete in some of the most reliably Republican areas in the country, Coleman’s seat should be one of the ripest pick-up opportunities on the board for Democrats.
And yet, barely more than three months from the finish line, Coleman is poised to buck the same odds that Robb did in 1994 – and he owes it all to Minnesota’s Democrats, who have, just like Virginia’s Republican 14 years ago, picked the one candidate capable of squandering the enormous built-in advantages that their party enjoys.
That would be Al Franken, the former Saturday Night Live writer and performer and Air America host, who returned to his native Minnesota a few years ago with an eye on Coleman’s Senate seat. As a public figure, Franken is proving to be about as polarizing as North – although, obviously, for very different reasons. (Franken has never stood accused of coordinating the illicit sale of weapons to Iran, transferring the resulting profits to an illegal war in Central America, or even of lying to Congress).
Hat tip: The Political Animal













8 Comments »
Comment posted July 31, 2008 @ 1:04 pm
I have been a Franken admirer for some time. I agree he worked hard to achieve the DFL endorsement. My problem is that I want him to spell out why I should vote FOR him. What is his vision of what he hopes to accomplish in the Senate? We all get that he hates Coleman, but this has to be more than a grudge match.
Comment posted July 30, 2008 @ 4:52 pm
Why is there this bizarre assumption on the part of Democrats, apparently nationally and not just DFL, that Coleman was a weak candidate? His approval rating hovering at 50% are just a sign of vulnerability, not that he’s going to lose. That’s the core fault with that Observer story, besides a questionable analogy to the 1994 Virginia race. The only thing I might fault Franken for is staying too long with an endorsement campaign and saving the good Coleman attacks for the base. Good ads have been web-only, but they have to go on TV to have an impact. The Republicans went into general election mode earlier, and they’re riding this advantage. I’m frustrated Franken isn’t hitting Coleman much harder on repeated factual misstatements, but I never expected an easy win and it’s far too early to give up.
Comment posted July 30, 2008 @ 3:54 pm
Franken won the nomination because he works harder than anyone I’ve ever seen.
He works the phones, he works the delegates, he works the streets, and he walks the walk of a candidate who really wants the job. Don’t sell him short.
Besides, Coleman flies in small planes more often than Franken does, and the FAA still hasn’t gotten the funds required to properly calibrate its automated radar locating service for small community airports.
When Wellstone’s plane went down, the reason the pilot was heard saying “Huh?” when he came down below the cloud cover was because he was two or three miles from where he expected to be, so he wasn’t looking at the end of the runway. The radar transponders
work by triangulation, and they have to be calibrated regularly. The FAA has been starved for funds to the point where they require vacationing employees to divert to any transponder within 200 miles of their intended route, climb the tower, and calibrate the machine on their own time.
This has not proven to be either popular or effective, but it does prove the efficacy of relying on prayer. Sort of like our bridges. (Don’t you pray more often now? Every time you go over or under one?)
Comment posted July 30, 2008 @ 2:36 pm
The party overwhelmingly won an open Senate seat in 2006, but also lost the governor’s race. It’s not been all roses for the DFL in the last 2 years. Franken has not run a particularly good campaign so far, but there’s a lot of race left to be run. Most polls have Franken significantly trailing, but it’s still a close heat in the Rasmussen polls (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/minnesota/election_2008_minnesota_senate).
Comment posted July 30, 2008 @ 9:36 am
The party overwhelmingly won an open Senate seat in 2006, but also lost the governor's race. It's not been all roses for the DFL in the last 2 years. Franken has not run a particularly good campaign so far, but there's a lot of race left to be run. Most polls have Franken significantly trailing, but it's still a close heat in the Rasmussen polls (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/...).
Comment posted July 30, 2008 @ 10:54 am
Franken won the nomination because he works harder than anyone I've ever seen.
He works the phones, he works the delegates, he works the streets, and he walks the walk of a candidate who really wants the job. Don't sell him short.
Besides, Coleman flies in small planes more often than Franken does, and the FAA still hasn't gotten the funds required to properly calibrate its automated radar locating service for small community airports.
When Wellstone's plane went down, the reason the pilot was heard saying “Huh?” when he came down below the cloud cover was because he was two or three miles from where he expected to be, so he wasn't looking at the end of the runway. The radar transponders
work by triangulation, and they have to be calibrated regularly. The FAA has been starved for funds to the point where they require vacationing employees to divert to any transponder within 200 miles of their intended route, climb the tower, and calibrate the machine on their own time.
This has not proven to be either popular or effective, but it does prove the efficacy of relying on prayer. Sort of like our bridges. (Don't you pray more often now? Every time you go over or under one?)
Comment posted July 30, 2008 @ 11:52 am
Why is there this bizarre assumption on the part of Democrats, apparently nationally and not just DFL, that Coleman was a weak candidate? His approval rating hovering at 50% are just a sign of vulnerability, not that he's going to lose. That's the core fault with that Observer story, besides a questionable analogy to the 1994 Virginia race. The only thing I might fault Franken for is staying too long with an endorsement campaign and saving the good Coleman attacks for the base. Good ads have been web-only, but they have to go on TV to have an impact. The Republicans went into general election mode earlier, and they're riding this advantage. I'm frustrated Franken isn't hitting Coleman much harder on repeated factual misstatements, but I never expected an easy win and it's far too early to give up.
Comment posted July 31, 2008 @ 8:04 am
I have been a Franken admirer for some time. I agree he worked hard to achieve the DFL endorsement. My problem is that I want him to spell out why I should vote FOR him. What is his vision of what he hopes to accomplish in the Senate? We all get that he hates Coleman, but this has to be more than a grudge match.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment