It seemed like a watershed on Thursday when CNN offhandedly described Gov. Pawlenty — who never seems to be quite as well known as he’d like to be — as “high profile.” Then Friday, as if on cue, the media put his comments about President Obama’s back-to-school speech up in lights.
Here’s what Pawlenty said to reporters at the Minnesota State Fair Friday morning, according to the Star Tribune, about Obama’s planned speech to school children:
At a minimum it’s disruptive, number two, it’s uninvited and number three, if people would like to hear his message they can, on a voluntary basis, go to YouTube or some other source and get it. I don’t think he needs to force it upon the nation’s school children.
And on his regular Friday radio show, joking about Obama’s purported request for letters from students:
There are going to be questions about — well, what are they are going to do with those names and is that for the purpose of a mailing list?
There was a time not so long ago when what T-Paw had to say at the State Fair or on his radio show — calling his wife, Mary, “fabulous, red hot, smokin’, sexy, wonderful,” trashing Obama — wouldn’t have traveled much beyond Minnesota’s borders.
But now that he has come clean about his presidential ambitions, such remarks — admittedly, on a hot topic during something of a late-summer news lull — are enough to draw attention from the likes of CBS, the Boston Globe, and far and wide via the Associated Press. (Heck, it’s national blog-fodder when Pawlenty gets ding-dong ditched.)
Indeed, the Democratic National Committee deemed Pawlenty’s jabs worthy of an official jab back:
One would think that encouragement and inspiration directly from the President of the United States to the next generation of Americans, an experience school children will not forget for the rest of their lives, would be something everyone would embrace. Outrageously, Governor Tim Pawlenty, who, as a leader in his state, should be encouraging the success of our children, would rather pander to the extreme right wing of the Republican Party by dismissing and joking about next week’s speech. The only joke here is Tim Pawlenty, who is clearly trying to out-Palin Sarah Palin in his sickening attempt to please the radical right-wing Glenn Beck’s of the world.
Pawlenty will be on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday, as will Sen. Amy Klobuchar.












17 Comments »
Comment posted September 5, 2009 @ 10:22 am
I have always voted for the candidate, regardless of party affiliation. Unless there is a drastic change in the leadership of the republican party, I will no longer be able to make that statement. I can honestly say that I am shocked at this latest wave of ignorant ranting. What has happened to reason and respect. Who will step forward with a degree of intelligence and thoughtfullness to lead the republican party? Is there anyone brave enough to step forward. If so, we may see a glimmer of hope for a viable republican presidential candidate.
Comment posted September 5, 2009 @ 10:39 am
You keep calling us names.. natzi, racist, terrorists, angy mob, radicals, etc.
The more you call us names, the more we get pissed off and determined to stop your socialist agends.
I was never interested in politics or involved before the Obamasiah started pissing all the money away and trying to take over.
I don’t know why you call yourself liberals. The only thing you are liberal about is drugs and sex. Do any drug you want and do anybody you want. Other than that all you do is try to tell other people what to do and how and when to do it. Get the HELL out of my life and wallet.
NOBAMA!
Comment posted September 5, 2009 @ 10:54 am
T-Paw is an ass and I can’t wait until Palin, Bachmann and all the other extremists turn on him. He is the worst kind of opportunist and he deserves everything that is going to happen to him – all of the humiliation and all of the disgrace. He is a shallow and empty talking head waiting for the wind to tell him which way he should be heading. He has never met a principle he couldn’t turn his back on.
Comment posted September 5, 2009 @ 4:06 pm
BOTTOM LINE to BOTH SIDES…..
I need only to say one thing about any President give school speeches…..
Never do I remember a President that attached any kind of self glorification as a required learning plan to be with a speech…
I seen the so called ORIGINAL questions and 4 of them as thus…
1. Why I admire the President
2. why his ideas are good.
3. how I can help the President.
4. something about why we listen to elected officials.
*** let us list them all…..
not sure of the 4th one but the first 3 are how any other dictator put such a mind set of question on kids in other countries.
Even so, why are the questions not “why I do” or “why I do not” admire President Obama would be more fitting.
That is a questions looking for an opinion, his their is only one direction for answers to glorify Obama.
Anyway Obama is the first to do that I know of.
Maybe Obama did not make the questions himself, but his czars did, Maybe his education czars glorify Obama but I DO NOT because his track records so far is nothing to glorify about.
and last thing, if his just gives a speech, so what. It the point that the questions can ONLY agree and ONLY glorify anything he speeches about leaving NO room for WHY NOT to agree!
Pingback posted September 5, 2009 @ 8:30 pm
[...] Pawlenty has been getting a lot of attention for claiming that the President of the United States’ forthcoming back-to-school speech is political. He’s shared some very odd talk about the fishiness of encouraging kids to write [...]
Comment posted September 5, 2009 @ 9:08 pm
What would people have done if last year President Bush had attempted to give a live speech addressing all the nation’s school children? Would you say “Great! Respect the President!”? Or, like the media would you have attacked Bush? I think everyone needs to mellow out but it is dishonest to act so shocked about people not wanting Obama’s speech to schoolchildren when you know you’d be just as mad if it were Bush.
Comment posted September 5, 2009 @ 9:09 pm
Rob,
The reason we keep calling out your conduct as nazi, racist, terrorist, angry and radical
is because that is what it is.
“Nazi” is from the German for “National Socialist,” which
was the name Goebbels suggested to Hitler for their political party. And it was just
another example of double-speak, because their real agenda was to get power by
using the power of government to benefit corporations. This looked just hunky-dory
to the people running the big corporations, so they gave them money and organizational
support, along with full access to their newspapers and radio stations. Once they got
real power, they were able to turn the tables and make the big corporations do what
they wanted. Another part of “National Socialism” was to get the churches to join in,
or to at least be afraid to speak out.
The problem today is we have a whole lot of people who figure the goal is to win power.
Some want to take control of the government because they figure then they can make
everyone be their kind of Christian. Others figure they should have power because they
can’t control their own lives. Neither of these kinds of people should ever be allowed
anywhere near our public institutions, but they just keep trying.
Religion and government are a lot like walking and chewing gum. You can do both at
the same time, but when you confuse the two, it gets sticky and messy.
Meantime, maybe just back off a bit and take care of your own problems. Leave off
the politics for awhile and maybe let things settle down a bit. We’d be able to afford
universal health care pretty easily if we weren’t paying for so much military stuff.
And what was so bad about the Clinton years, anyway? Peace, prosperity, a little
nooky every now and then. Bet you had more of each then than you do now, eh?
Comment posted September 5, 2009 @ 9:27 pm
Dotty, completely feeling your pain. Who let the crazies into my (former) party, the GOP?
Rob, hmm, do your homework. The Nazi party and the Fascists were the extreme RIGHT wing of respective governments. (and spell check can be your friend) This knowledge, combined with the bizarre behavior of the ultra-Conservative “base” (which I do not believe is the true base),has forced me to seriously reconsider my party loyalty.
I’m getting the idea that the GOP is actually quite racist, which really makes me sad.
Comment posted September 5, 2009 @ 10:19 pm
“At a minimum it’s disruptive, number two, it’s uninvited and number three, if people would like to hear his message they can, on a voluntary basis, go to YouTube or some other source and get it. I don’t think he needs to force it upon the nation’s school children.”
Didn’t heat T-Paw bitchin’ about “MY PET GOAT”
Ah, but the amiable prick would like the same opportunity…
Comment posted September 6, 2009 @ 12:03 am
Pawlenty stoops to a new low. Using a bunch of school kids and a speech about studying hard to push your fringe right-wing agenda? Beyond pathetic.
Comment posted September 6, 2009 @ 9:36 am
King Timmy has no right to say anything on this matter. He is the lame duck Governor.
This is the President of the United States and Mr. Obama is in charge of the Dept of Education and what is done in the schools.
King Timmy, go back under your rock & don’t come out again.
Comment posted September 6, 2009 @ 10:45 am
I never thought I’d see the day when parents would demand a President of the United States be barred from addressing their children. Because our current President is of another party (and, in some cases, because he is of African descent), he is now being treated as, immoral, villainous, toxic and alien. It will surely not be lost on African-Americans that a new precedent is being set for our first African-American President. Speaking as a Democrat, I have never in my life dreamed of treating any Republican President like a drug pusher or sex offender simply for offering to speak to schoolchildren. It is the height of impudence that any President’s remarks be “screened” by parent-ideologues of the other party, by tendentious teachers or school administrators. That any teacher, principal, school board, municipality or state should take part in this outrage is nothing less than a scandal. I rarely use this term, but there is no other term for it: is un-American.
Comment posted September 6, 2009 @ 5:20 pm
Pawlenty is an opportunistic ass. When he did the Al Hunt Bloomberg interview a few weeks ago from the State Capital, it was purely set up as a “meet the candidate” type forum. There were extra security, extra lighting, extra environmental costs, etc. I called their office to ask if the state gets reimbursed for us paying for his campaign activities and I talked to this lady named Cara from the guv’s office and she was the most condescending, arrogant thing I had ever talked to. She claimed that TPaw does so many interviews “for the state of Minnesota” that it would be impossible to separate out these costs. “It is all for the good of the state” … how stupid . Why am I paying for him to move ideologically away from the state and pander to the “right” repubs and ignore his job? He doesn’t represent Minnesota.
Comment posted September 6, 2009 @ 9:13 pm
After the President of the United States speaks to school children about the value of education, Republicans will make opposing comments extolling ignorance.
See:
http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/obamas-dangerous-message-to-our-children/
Comment posted September 7, 2009 @ 8:20 am
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=160&topic_id=36933&mesg_id=36934
Comment posted September 7, 2009 @ 9:44 am
Email the governor and express your opinion please. I sent him an email expressing my dismay at his going along with the clearly partisan opposition by giving them any credence whatsoever in their attempt to block the president’s address. It’s disgusting! I also sent an email to my school district administrator, saying that if the partisan opposition can intercede and threaten to keep their kids home, I can insist on his address being shown and threaten to keep my kids home if it is NOT shown! See how silly that is? I know schools want more parental involvement, but not of this kind. What is being demonstrated is bully behavior, we teach our kids about that. Talk about mixed messages. Further, I suspect that those who are so adamant about not letting the president speak either have their kids in a private institiution (for proper indoctrination), or have them home schooled (even worse for them).
Comment posted September 8, 2009 @ 2:00 pm
Gov. Pawlenty is just another symptom of what is wrong in this country because of the Republican party (specifically the conservative right wing). We as a society and a citizenship need leaders who understand their first priority is to ensure the protection and prosperity of society as a whole and all the citizen of the United States and not I repeat not their own political agendas.
I feel like even though we elected a Democratic legislature and president, we are all still being held hostage by the right-wing agenda and political games. If the Republicans didn’t get the message that people are sick of it in the last couple of elections then they really are ignorant.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment