Once a Lutheran altar boy, University of Minnesota biology professor Morris P.Z. Myers has fallen from grace — at least in the eyes of some Catholics and the conservative Catholic League. One of the more prominent atheist voices in America, Myers wrote a blog post on the furor sparked by a Florida college student who smuggled a communion wafer out of mass and, once found out, received threats of harm and death. Catholics believe the bread, once blessed by a priest, has been transformed into the substance of Christ’s body and blood. Myers doesn’t buy it. He wrote that if readers of his blog send him a consecrated host, "I’ll show you sacrilege, gladly, and with much fanfare."
I reached him this morning to discuss the controversy that has resulted in several thousand comments at his blog — some calling him a "Jewboy," others announcing his need for prayer, and still others calling for his death.
Minnesota Independent: The incident with college student Webster Cook comes as religious passions everywhere are incredibly inflamed –- Shiites and Sunnis, Evangelicals and atheists, etc. Does this say anything about the state of religion?
PZ Myers: I think this is a symptom of the weakness of the religious in this country right now. Religion is actually fading a little bit. It’s still strong,and it’s still out there and there’s still a vocal political realm, but I think people know that there are people actively challenging religion now.
I think there’s also a growing discontent with what the religious have done in politics. The Bush administration is a perfect example of political cronyism and political advocacy built largely on the support of the religious right, and look where it’s gotten us. People are disillusioned. So [religious people are] worried. I think they’ve got reason to be worried. We’re going to see an increasing weakness of the church. This is them lashing out. It’s a disparate ploy to be relevant and to be important again… They’re looking for somebody to take their ire out on.
MnIndy: I was raised Catholic, was an altar boy, and attended Catholic grade school and college. While I was taught to be reverent with Catholic symbols and artifacts, I also learned of a powerful god, totally unlike this fragile one that can be damaged by a non-believer’s mishandling of a communion wafer.
Myers: It’s actually kind of sad. I grew up in a church, although I’m, of course, no longer a member of a church, but it is kind of weird to see this going on right now. The messages I’ve been getting in my email have just been insane. People who say this cracker is literally and physically the body of their god and that I’m doing this great act of heresy and sacrilege and horror — even though I didn’t actually do anything to it — is disturbing. It’s like discovering there are witch doctors lurking in your community and they’ve been doing weird practices.
MnIndy: What about the stories of US military personnel urinating on and otherwise abusing copies of the Koran in Iraq? Were you outraged by that, or is that a different version of this for you?
Myers: There’s a subtle difference there — maybe an important difference. I don’t favor the idea of going to somebody’s home or to something they own and possess and consider very important, like a graveyard — going to a grave and desecrating that. That’s something completely different. Because what you’re doing is doing harm to something unique and something that is rightfully part of somebody else — it’s somebody else’s ownership. The cracker is completely different. This is something that’s freely handed out.
MnIndy: Do you see a parallel between this case and the furor in Denmark (and later the Islamic world at large) over cartoonists’ depictions of Mohammed? It seems unlikely that these Catholics would take kindly to being compared to Islamic extremists, but death threats over the fate of a host suggests it’s not an unfair characterization.
Myers: Of course! Both are demands that quirky sectarian peculiarities be given undue respect by those who don’t believe in them. Furthermore, the majority of the email I’m receiving is making it explicit: they are telling me that I should not abuse their sacred icon, but that I should instead go do something sacrilegious with the Koran.
MnIndy: William Donohue’s Catholic League really drove the anger over this. How do you see their role? Genuine protector of the faith? Or is this one of those red-meat issues that drives donations? Some other factor?
Myers: Bill Donohue’s salary. This is Donohue’s stock in trade: demagogic manufactured outrage to get the faithful to send him money to protect their religion from largely imaginary threats… threats that he conjures up.
Constantine’s Sword is a book (and now a documentary) written by James Carroll, a former Catholic priest. It’s a personal history of the unpleasant history of the church and anti-semitism, and shows that Catholicism has benefited from fueling an image of itself as always threatened by unbelievers — Jews, Muslims, Satanists, atheists — and that this reliance on hatred of the other has damaged the virtue of the faith. (Carroll is still a devout Catholic — he just deplores the distortion of a message of love into a message of fear and hate.) The idea that Jews, for instance, want to steal consecrated wafers as an element of evil Jewish rites has been circulated fairly often, as a preliminary rationalization for oppression.
Curiously, many (but still a minority) of the email messages I have received have ‘accused’ me of being Jewish, addressing me as "jew boy" or "liberal pinko jew."
MnIndy: Are you concerned for your safety?
Myers: Well, most of the ravers who threaten me with horrible fates are far away, hiding in the safety of their mothers’ bedrooms, hurling vituperation anonymously across the internet. These are largely frustrated losers who are venting. If (and I do not have reason to suspect anyone has gotten this demented) someone were serious about doing me harm, they wouldn’t be sending me lurid warnings.
But really, the majority of the angry emails threaten nothing but to assault me with prayer.
MnIndy: Has the outrcry over your your post given you second thoughts about getting a host and treating "it with profound disrespect and heinous cracker abuse, all photographed and presented here on the web"?
Myers: The response has done nothing but confirm it: I have to do something. I’m not going to just let this disappear. It’s just so darned weird that they’re demanding that I offer this respect to a symbol that means nothing to me. Something will be done. It won’t be gross. It won’t be totally tasteless, but yeah, I’ll do something that shows this cracker has no power. This cracker is nothing.













100 Comments »
Comment posted July 30, 2008 @ 8:46 pm
Well it seems time to take this off of my bookmark list. TJ has nothing more to say.
Comment posted July 25, 2008 @ 3:39 pm
Time for you to target your frothing on the Pharyngula forums, TJ. Finally you can stop crowing about the cracker, because it has been well and thoroughly desecrated.
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/07/the_great_desecration.php
Comment posted July 24, 2008 @ 11:26 am
The garbage that’s flying here is hard to stomach, starting with this interview.
It
Comment posted July 23, 2008 @ 10:50 pm
For anyone that still cares, PZ has dealt the the cracker(s) in question.
Comment posted July 23, 2008 @ 6:03 pm
The bullshit that’s flying here is hard to stomach, starting with this interview. Its a snapshot of a purportedly educated pillar of his academic community trying to pull anything and everything out of his ass to justify stunningly stupid statements.
He claims the student in Florida was the reason behind his current crusade to ’set things straight’. He claims he’s outraged by the abuse this idiot has received, when it’s apparent to anyone that the punk wasn’t ‘Catholic’, and his intent all along was to do something that he knew, full well, would likely get him into serious trouble. In simple English, he wanted to get some kicks at the expense of a religious service (protected under our Constitution). This isn’t ‘freedom of speech’, by any stretch, but a violation of this Catholic campus group to have the integrity of it’s service protected from assholes.
Not much more than ~ 150 yrs ago, there were churches in many places in the US which, when built, had to take into account likely distances and trajectories of rocks thrown, whose targets were stained glass.
Any attempt at desecration of the Eucharist (like skipping out of a church with it for some campus show-and-tell, or doing what Myers has been contemplating with his ‘protest’) would have been met, in any place and at any time, with a forceful, and if necessary, physical response: check your history.
This isn’t about ‘fundamentalism’, worldwide religious turmoil, or any of the other canards cited above.
Myers can exercise his choice to remain an aetheist, to think what he wishes.
He has no right, by any standard, to use his position as an academic, to exhort similar idiots to perfrom further mindless acts. Acts considered amazingly offensive to Catholics.
He doesn’t like Catholics? He should check his employer’s antidiscrimination guidelines before he opens his mouth again.
Comment posted July 21, 2008 @ 10:27 am
Day 13 and those “crackers” remain as snug as a bug in a rug.
LOL!
If any of you PZians are still harboring some hope, let me put an end to your angst. Yes, children, you’ve all been punk’d.
PZ will set fire to his own hair before he so much as looks at those hosts cross-eyed. Why, you wonder?
Well it’s simple, children.
PZ would lose his job. And the pickin’s for extremely untalented, big mouthed kooks looking to land comfy teaching jobs are, well, very limited these days.
But don’t despair PZians…let not your hearts be troubled! Just as sure as PZ will never desecrate an article of anyone’s faith (yes, you can stop sending him Korans too), he will always keep his portal to lunacy open for business…it’s his lifeline, his single claim to fame, and it’s a lot cheaper than the intense psychoanalysis he’d need to settle down to anything approaching normalcy.
So by all means continue to post your spittle flecked amphigory, your artfully crafted photoshop renditions of your hearts desire, let your hatred pour forth from that evacuated space between your ears as the waters poured from Lake Delton.
PZ’s playhouse is open for business.
Hahaaa!
Comment posted July 18, 2008 @ 10:27 am
@perrinbrady:
Your quotations and explanations of the inner workings of the Catholic faith and sacraments are interesting, but aren’t really the point here. PZ Myers originally objected to the entire notion that stealing a cracker could be considered a ‘hate crime’ or on par with ‘kidnapping’. The student responsible has been threatened for a ‘crime’ that really only affects a cracker. Myers real thrust with his stated desire to commit cracker abuse was to stick a finger in the eye of the entire notion that there is a victim in cracker crime. After all, he’s not a student who is at the mercy of the SGA or university authorities, who can be cowed into submission. He is an adult who in his personal life answers to no one, and has the freedom to make a statement…hence him asking someone to bring him a consecrated cracker, so he can demonstrate some real cracker abuse. The fact that no one has been able to score such a cracker yet is not all that surprising. Most of us atheists don’t spend much time hanging around /any/ church, and considering the fervor and hysteria surrounding the Eucharist, it seems that even taking a few extra seconds to swallow it is viewed with suspicion and hostility (as happened in the original case that got this whole ball rolling). Soon as one of us gets our hands on one, I think a new wave of outrage will be pending.
I don’t beleve in any of the things you posted. I’m in no way obligated to consider your beliefs sacred any more than you are required to consider the 69 virgins doctrine of Islam to be sacred, or that cows are sacred. In this country, you get to believe whatever you want (or nothing at all). Freedom /from/ religion is as much guaranteed as freedom /of/ religion. Atheists have a saying, “We’re the same as you are, except we believe in one less god than you do.”
Until such time as Catholicism is the state religion, none of us are under any obligation to share your outrage over crimes committed against a snack food, nor should we ever be so ridiculous as to compare such a ‘crime’ to kidnapping or torture.
@tjswift: This is the only time I will address you directly, as judging by other posts of yours you are a professional troll on this site, spending most of your time during the day making childish posts that do nothing but attempt to glorify your own ego. I understand that you are upset by what Myers has threatened to do, and I understand your tactic. He’s a professor, so you might as well attack his professional achievements and insult the UofM Morris as the only way you can conceive of to hurt his feelings as much as he has hurt yours. The desperation evident in your daily reminders that he still hasn’t desecrated a cracker illustrates this plainly. No one believes you’ve actually researched his work, but no one really cares if you have. You’ve discredited your intelligence so many times in this thread alone that there is simply no point debating with you. It’s like debating with a 2-year-old when the only thing you have to offer is a “Nyah nyah!” coupled with your fingers jammed in your ears. Some people might be drawn into that kind of frustrating, unproductive ‘discussion’, but not me.
Comment posted July 18, 2008 @ 9:38 am
Day 10 since Meyers opened his gob. Score:
The “Cracker”: 10
PZ Meyers and his flying monkeys: ZERO
This is what comes when you put your faith in a crackpot that after a career of corn-ball quackery can’t even earn enough respect to attain full Professorship at a corn-field extension college.
Kind of sad…heh, not really.
Comment posted July 17, 2008 @ 10:57 pm
Myers: “…The cracker is completely different. This is something that’s freely handed out”
TRUTH: The Eucharist (communion) is handed out not “freely” as you state, but on the honor system. By walking up the the Priest or the Eucharistic Minister, hearing the words “The Body of Christ”, and returning the response, “Amen” is the same as saying, “I am a Catholic Christian who has been properly prepared for the reception of what I do believe to be the Body Blood Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ in Sacramental form under the species of bread.” Anyone who goes up to and receives the Eucharist with any other intention or under any other condition violates the honor system = violates their honor, and commits a sacrilege in the least. Someone with hostile intentions, especially if they involve other’s in their dirty work violates their honor, the honor of the other, and certainly commits more than a sacrilege, aka, complete disrespect and dishonesty with regard to the sacred and divine.
Myers: “It won’t be totally tasteless, but yeah, I’ll do something that shows this cracker has no power.”
UNDERSTANDING: First of all, it’s too late for trying not to be tasteless, the entire intention is beyond good taste, and completely uncreative. But Myers, you miss the point entirely. The power in the Eucharist is not something that can be measured in some sort of lab or by some sort of gesture. It is the power of grace and mercy at work. Consider an analogy which gets to the idea a little but even this does not speak fully of the reality. If you hold in your hand a seed, it appears to have no power, and indeed it is helpless in your hand and depends entirely on your good will to plant it in fertile soil, and water it. But once you do plant it in fertile soil, and nurture and water it, the power is released from the seed and it grows into a plant. Like this, the Eucharist, Christ himself in Sacramental form places Himself in your hands, and like a seed the power is unleashed wen planed in to the fertile soil, which is a person receiving the Eucharist with a heart of Faith. In this fertile soil the grace present in the Eucharist grows and strengthens the believer, as the believer nurtures this gift which he or she has received.
When you hold the Eucharist in your hand, you are holding the Sacramental (not simply Symbolic) presence of the Christ who willingly gave himself into the hands of those who hated him and were afraid of him. You can choose to do as they did insulting him and desecrating his body, and taking advantage of his meekness out of their hatred born of insecurity. Or you can act as Veronica did, wiping his face and holding the body of this one sacred whom all others where then despising.
Consider again this analogy. Is it not true that a Baby, held in your hands has no power over you? Rather, the child is completely at your disposal, and again helplessly dependent on your good intention. But if you do what is unthinkable and abuse this child’s haplessness, and show that it has no ‘power’ over you, does it’s personhood somehow disappear. Governor Schwarzenegger was a baby once, with complete dependency on his family, yet we all know that power was contained in him (for good of for ill, this is not a political statement).
Your intentions and potential actions will show nothing new about the power of the Eucharist. It will only show that you have missed the point entirely in the first place. And those who agree with you have a very limited view of power. Power itself, though fully present in the Eucharist, is not the point. If Jesus wanted to boast of his Omnipotence, he would have come in the form of a hammer, not food, not the form of bread. It speaks of the nature of this power.
“My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” 2 Corinthians 12:9
Does bread itself have might? It does when if is metabolized in the body of a strong person. Thus the Eucharist only has power when it is received by a person of faith, without faith the Eucharist can not be ‘metabolized.’ You cannot feed bread to a rock and expect the rock to split. Feed bread to a person with a hammer, and you will see the rock split. Feed the Eucharist to a person of Faith and you will see mountains moved, if you have eyes to see.
Comment posted July 17, 2008 @ 3:57 pm
doberman, the wind has a pleasing quality about it so I don’t think that’s it.
Comment posted July 17, 2008 @ 12:08 pm
Does anyone hear something? Like the hysterical buzzing of an irrelevant gnat?
Hmmm, maybe it’s just the wind.
Comment posted July 17, 2008 @ 10:42 am
Another day passes, and Meyers’ captive “crackers” are still just sitting there on the table with their metaphorical fingers in Meyers’ eye.
Comment posted July 17, 2008 @ 12:42 am
Aaaaaand now for some perspective: It’s a cracker. PZ Myers had the audacity to threaten…..a cracker. And he didn’t even threaten YOUR cracker, the one you’re eating right now, or will eat next Sunday. He threatened a hypothetical cracker.
Even among other Christians (ie., pretty much every denomination except Catholicism), the claim that this cracker at the moment of blessing /literally/ becomes flesh (which is simultaneously undetectable in any way by scientific observation) is absolutely ridiculous. The Southern Baptists would laugh. The Presbyterians would snicker. The rest would look at their Catholic brethren in that sort of shamefaced way that they look to their drunken uncle and would whisper those simple words of perspective, “Uh, guys…it’s just a symbolic gesture, it’s not /really/ the body of Christ.”
Yes, PZ Myers is an atheist. He’s also in agreement with pretty much every other human being on the planet (except Catholics) that it’s just a freaking cracker.
Plenty of Catholics laugh and scoff at the idea that cows are sacred, while they desecrate beef by EATING it, if you can believe it. The gall! Please stop persecuting the Hindus, everyone.
Oh, but screw the Hindus, right? I mean….they are a significant minority in this country. And that’s what this is really all about, isn’t it?
Christianity is the majority religion in this country, so it deserves nothing but reverence and acceptance.
Well sorry, my opinion is that it’s all a crock. It’s a dog and pony show, the blind leading the blind…and it’s an orchestra that is so well conducted that they’ve got some of us believing that snack food is divine. NOTHING is that good, I’m sorry.
Well, maybe sushi. But that’s another topic.
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 11:28 am
@tjswift, you forgot to close one <b> element. Now everything after your jul 16 2008 10:34am comment is BOLD! I fixed that with an extra </b> , I hope
.
As for Myers, give the man some time! He’s been away on a conference for a couple days And surely, if you were him, you also would draw this out as long as you could. I know I would. We’re all attention whores, after all.
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 11:04 am
TJ,
Smooth for the ordinance, crunchy for the sacrament… it is obvious.
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 11:01 am
Blah, blah, blah.
It’s time for Meyers to smash the cracker or admit he’s afraid to do so. Which will be a tacit confession that it’s not just a cracker after all.
Hell, tell the poor boob that I’ll send him some peanut butter and jelly to use on it.
Crunchy, or smooth?
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 10:51 am
TJ,
It is not obvious that reasoning stops when you cannot formulate an equation.
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 10:34 am
Heh. We are talking about a nut case here folks, not an op-amp.
Unfortunately I cannot apply Thevenin’s theorem to Meyers (It’s just a frackin’ collection of letters, I’ll arrange them as I please); Kirchoff’s law doesn’t apply to crackpot assistant professors.
…but as “fellow” Engineers, I shouldn’t have to point out the obvious to you.
We can however, encourage the aforementioned crackpot to put up or shut up, which is exactly what I’m doing, and doing very well thankyouverymuch.
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 9:57 am
TJ,
A devastating demonstration of critical thinking skills – that guessing part is brilliant!!
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 9:51 am
“Here’s the evidence at hand”
Your evidence sounds a lot like speculation, and not even very good speculation. You are assuming both that someone had access to crackers, immediately went out and secured the cracker, and was in close enough proximity that the could deliver it to him personally or paid to overnight it to him. That seems like a lot of effort for just a cracker.
How many readers of a fairly blatant atheist blog are in the position to waltz into a catholic church and steal a waffer? How many actually have the balls to do so without giving themselves away because of nervousness, not because they fear the define wrath of crackers, but the mortal wrath of religious folks that will issue death threats over said crackers?
As an engineer you haven’t really done a great deal of work considering the variables involved. Additionally you have been more than happy to caustically point out that you think MYERS (note the spelling, it has only been pointed out about two dozen times to you) is full of hate while ironically being far more hateful in your dialog about a fellow human being than Myers ever was about a cracker and those who idolize it. Your presentation of your viewpoints has reflected very poorly on yourself. You could have very easily presented your viewpoint in a much less caustic (and thus more receptive) tone, and if you are Christian (given your zeal over the issue that seems a fair assumption) you obviously haven’t learned a whole lot from the teaching of Jesus (his sentiment is something believers and non-believers would both be well off emulating).
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 8:11 am
Here
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 10:58 pm
TJ,
As a fellow Engineer, are you dealing seriously with the evidence at hand?
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 9:13 pm
jinxmchue quoting me:
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 7:32 pm
Some are terribly offended. Ok, I get that. But would Jesus mock the U of Minnesota? Would Jesus threaten PZ with death? What about all those drops of wine that are spilled every Sunday during communion, does Jesus get upset with the waste of xxx pints of blood every week?
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 6:20 pm
Webster Cook leaves his church with a Eucharist intact and the world goes crazy. Catholics want to punish Mr. Cook in some kind of neo-inquisitionial fashion and liken his removal of a wafer to kidnapping.
From a news story:
“‘It is hurtful,’ said Father Migeul Gonzalez with the Diocese. ‘Imagine if they kidnapped somebody and you make a plea for that individual to please return that loved one to the family.’”
From another news story:
“Minutes before the Mass began, Student Senator Webster Cook returned the Holy Eucharist he was holding hostage in a Ziploc bag ever since smuggling the blessed wafer of bread out of the Catholic Mass service Sunday, June 29.”
To someone like PZ Myers; kidnapping. smuggling, and holding a wafer (even if consecrated) hostage must have a ring of silliness. Especially, if like Myers, you do not believe in any god or religion. So, he commented on it in his blog. Now, the Catholic League wants him punished and fired because he wants to abuse a wafer or a cracker as he calls it.
If there is a god, then both Webster Cook and PJ Myers may fear for their eternal souls, but I can’t help but think the overreaction of Catholics to both is ridiculous.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 2:29 pm
Of course now everybody is waiting with bated breath to see what Myers will do to the cracker. But really I’m more interested in South Parks rendering of the story. It’ll probably be something along the lines of the Fantastic Easter Special
.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 1:30 pm
dina
“Catholics have the right to worship in peace in this country and not have to worry that someone will come and desecrate what is sacred to them.”
Uh, yeah. And that includes young Mr. Cook, who was manhandled and threatened within the walls of his own church, simply because he didn’t swallow on time. He merely wanted to show the wafer to his friend who had accompanied him to the service and was curious about it. If he had been left alone, none of this would ever have happened.
“This person didn
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 1:13 pm
Shorter rbh:
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 1:10 pm
“To fail to do so is to leave them in the ignorance with which they arrived….To be blunt, if some or most of my students aren
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 1:05 pm
I’m amazed at how much vitriol is spewed at a 60-year-old professor. Particularly when the guy is really only 51 (born March 9, 1957). I guess some people care more about attacking someone’s credibility than doing it credibly.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 12:07 pm
Silverfox wrote
“When you accept employment at a public university you agree not to behave in such a way as to reflect negatively on the university. When you offer to desecrate objects that are considered sacred to the deeply held religious beliefs of a significant number of the sutdent body at that university who are Catholics and when the dinegration of their religion may more others to tease or harass them, then you have created a hostile learning environment for a segment of the student body based on their religious identification. No public university can allow this to happen.”
That’s knee-deep bullshit. When acerbic, unpopular, even offensive speech cannot be tolerated in a university, that university is dead. The main purpose of a university is to jostle, shake up, poke at, and vigorously question beliefs and claims, and thereby cause people to examine their pre-existing conceptions. To fail to do so is to leave them in the ignorance with which they arrived. I write that as a graduate (BA & PhD) of the U of Minnesota and a long-time professor at an excellent private liberal arts college. To be blunt, if some or most of my students aren’t shaken up and even offended by what I have said in class, I’ve failed.
“Hostile learning environment” is new-speak for “don’t make me think and leave me to wallow in my unfettered ignorance.”
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 11:35 am
While we’d love to keep the discussion, uh, spirited, it seems this thread is frequently crossing the line of civility. I’d prefer not to delete comments, but if the personal attacks continue, I’ll start. Thanks.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 10:43 am
dina775: Wow. Was that rant for real? I have trouble any sentient human being could truly believe such nonsense. Brides of Christ? Lambs to slaughter? What the heck was that all about?
tjswift: Can one really become an Electrical Engineer without passing fourth grade Spelling? This country truly is going to hell…
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 10:18 am
Sorry blackjack,
You can rant all you want, but no matter how many times you put “Dr.” in front of Meyers name, it won’t change the fact that at 60 years of age he has attained the academic equivalent of supermarket bag boy and he is working at the equivalent of the Piggly-Wiggly in Borax Ca.
You morons that are so insistent on defending Meyers’ pitiful record of academic mummery either a) are dumber than Meyers or b) realize that without the veneer of credibility that your protestations hope to convey to Meyers, you, he and every other PZian are clearly seen as nothing more than the bag of ignorant, spittle flecked assholes (with all the good ones picked out) that you are.
I suggest Meyers find an honorable bone and do the right thing by the students of the University of Minnesota, the parents who are under the mistaken impression that their kids are receiving a quality education in PZ
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 10:15 am
Dina: Can you offer a link that shows any of the 12 Danish cartoonists involved in the Muhammed controversy have “been burned to death”?
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 10:13 am
“If he were a Christian educator blogging on the clock”
Actually, you seem to misunderstand the employment agreement that scientific faculty operate under. They are not on the clock per se, as they are salaried. They have an obligation to instruct a certain number of classes (most of the time. Some are there just for research) but the rest of the time is theirs for their research, or blogging, or whatever.
“Catholics have the right to worship in peace in this country and not have to worry that someone will come and desecrate what is sacred to them. ”
Hmmm, I didn’t see that codified in the first amendment. I don’t see a cracker protection clause there anywhere. What I did see was a separation of church and state and a restriction on what restrictions can be applied to expression. I can burn bibles on my lawn and the worst I can get is slapped with fire code violation, because I can expression ideas you find inflamatory.
As the religious right has demonstrated ad naseum in this country is that anyone can be as inflammatory and hateful as they want and still find their expression protected. They can protest at the funeral of Mr. Rogers, the nicest man in our country’s history, a positive and moral role model for millions and about the closest a public figure has gotten to expressing the tolerant ideals of one Jesus Christ, because he wouldn’t use his program to denounce homosexuality. They can actively encourage the hate and discrimination of homosexuals, lobby to deny homosexuals equal rights, because expression is protected.
Just as a man has the right to desecrate a cracker.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 10:08 am
But who knows, he might become like St. Paul…or Professor Joseph Pearce of Ave Maria University who was once a racist, hippie agnostic who also because of his protestant roots breathed fire at the church, and then God hit him in the head with a 2 by 10 and he is now a huge apologist for the faith.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Pearce
I will pray for his conversion. It should interesting.
Dina
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 9:55 am
jinxmchue you said: ‘The tone and spirit of his comments, if they were to come from a Christian, would not be tolerated in the least.’
you are right. But I have never heard this kind of thing from any other Christians, only ex-catholics, because no one can blaspheme like an ex-catholic. no one.
dina
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 9:50 am
Catholics have the right to worship in peace in this country and not have to worry that someone will come and desecrate what is sacred to them. He is violating that right. Who cares if you atheist’s believe it or not! We have a constitutional right.
This person didn’t get any REAL death threats and it’s obvious in his demeanor. How dare he compare Catholics real heartbroken outcry to the insane frenzy of jihadists rioting in the streets, burning down property??!! And how stupid really!! That poor Danish cartoonist had to go into hiding and has since been burned to death. Cook is not going into hiding, and neither is Myers! You know he isn’t. Nor does he need too.
If this person was really serious about his contempt for ‘all’ religion, let’s see him tear up a koran in public. You know he wont because he is a coward.
However, no death threats are necessary in this case. He has handled something more dangerous to the ill willed then the Ark of the covenant was to purified priests and non-believers.
Catholics tell him that that is truly the body and blood of Christ, He should be take this seriously: just because you don’t understand a thing, doesn’t mean it isn’t what it is. You can’t see radioactivity. Radioactive items will kill you even if you aren’t immediately burned. The Host is Spiritually radioactive. His soul is now irreversibly dying. When he leaves the veil of this world he will find his soul charred from radioactive poison.
Thats why he hasn’t gotten any *real* threats (if he had any real threats he would have posted them like the Danish cartoonist did.) And why you don’t see Catholic rioting in the streets, burning down buildings.
Because Catholics are the true Bride of Christ. We are lambs to the slaughter. We know that this is a sign of our coming persecution. We follow our crucified Lord to the cross, and this is the beginning of the American church’s martyrdom. He is a sign that our constitutional rights are no longer going to be honored. America was a lovely interlude of religious freedom. Soon that will end. Soon it will be impossible for Catholics to worship in public at all as as it was in the beginning of our countries history and the British Penal laws were still in place. People like him will only be too happy to have those penal laws in place.
We know this is just the beginning. Soon more like this person will get bolder and more violent and eventually Catholics will have to Worship in smaller and more private settings. Already we have people from gay and lesbian activist groups disrupting Masses all over the country…..and they will only get bolder because of this. He is just a warning note to us to be ready.
dina
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 8:49 am
“so your whole argument revolves around which pc he is using when he is posting? While I don
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 8:38 am
“Apparently none. That
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 8:31 am
tjswift: if self-righteous, incoherent, jealous, unpopular arsewipe is a synonym for dyslexic then yes, you are dyslexic. Dr Meyers has attained more in his career than you will ever hope for, of that I am certain.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 2:19 am
The Hatch Act only is a federal law and is absolutely not applicable in this case.
It’s possible that this will run afoul of the faculty code of conduct ( http://www1.umn.edu/regents/policies/academic/Code_of_Conduct.pdf ). That’s up to the University. However, if what he is saying is disallowed, what he is doing is even more valuable since there is an opportunity to effect some real change.
Religious ideas do not deserve special respect.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 12:35 am
Re: shilchie:
True, research and/or educational institutions funded in part or whole by State or Local funds are exempt from the FEDERAL Hatch Act. But, this does address the point of “free speech”. There are limitations to what you can say or do. It is not an absolute right. PZ’s limitations would be in conforming to Minnesota rules and to the employment agreement or Faculty Handbook as they govern faculty conduct
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 11:13 pm
It just hit me: Is this the same “Jinx/The Laughing Man” who got banned from the christian board “Theology Web” because you were complaining too much about how the non-christians are able to speak their minds?
——
“What was I “lightly moderated” for? Some slightly blue, PG-13 jokes. Here’s another: some people here have their heads so far up their keisters that they find good-natured jokes far more offensive than the vile lies that atheists and other Christian-haters here spread on a regular basis. (Okay, so that wasn’t a joke. Sue me. Or rather, “lightly mod” me.) They would rather that people see “God is a lie” than the word “bloody.”"
——
From a mod’s reply:
—–
You have repeatedly made numerous violations which accumulated to 10 points. Worse yet, the exact violation that put you over the top… was the exact thing you had been warned for the week prior.
Anyone can make a mistake, only a fool repeats those, beratingly so.
——-
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 10:41 pm
jinxmchue:True, but then how much of his blogging activities are done while on the taxpayers
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 10:15 pm
jinxmchue, so your whole argument revolves around which pc he is using when he is posting? While I don’t think it matters I can at least see a rationale. But is that really what concerns you? You adolescent mockery of him ‘muttering to himself’ makes me suspect that you are offended by any outspoken atheism (or even theistic evolution).
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 9:53 pm
“But let us not forget that he is an 60 year old
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 9:53 pm
strangertomn, so if
1)I think something is stupid
2)Someone does something that others find EXTREMELY offensive
3)That someone then becomes the target of death threats
4)I am so offended by this I say I will do something EXTREMELY offensive
5)I receive death threats
I am therefore the equivalent of Fred Phelps and I care carry the banner of hatred?
Saying something is stupid is just that, it’s saying something is stupid. Which leads me to the fact that you might be a nice guy but I think you’ve just said something incredibly stupid.
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 9:49 pm
“what he does on his own time is his own business.”
True, but then how much of his blogging activities are done while on the taxpayers’ dime and with taxpayer-paid computers?
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 4:49 pm
“what he does on his own time is his own business.”
True, but then how much of his blogging activities are done while on the taxpayers' dime and with taxpayer-paid computers?
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 4:53 pm
strangertomn, so if
1)I think something is stupid
2)Someone does something that others find EXTREMELY offensive
3)That someone then becomes the target of death threats
4)I am so offended by this I say I will do something EXTREMELY offensive
5)I receive death threats
I am therefore the equivalent of Fred Phelps and I care carry the banner of hatred?
Saying something is stupid is just that, it's saying something is stupid. Which leads me to the fact that you might be a nice guy but I think you've just said something incredibly stupid.
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 4:53 pm
“But let us not forget that he is an 60 year old
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 5:15 pm
jinxmchue, so your whole argument revolves around which pc he is using when he is posting? While I don't think it matters I can at least see a rationale. But is that really what concerns you? You adolescent mockery of him 'muttering to himself' makes me suspect that you are offended by any outspoken atheism (or even theistic evolution).
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 5:41 pm
jinxmchue:True, but then how much of his blogging activities are done while on the taxpayers
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 6:13 pm
It just hit me: Is this the same “Jinx/The Laughing Man” who got banned from the christian board “Theology Web” because you were complaining too much about how the non-christians are able to speak their minds?
——
“What was I “lightly moderated” for? Some slightly blue, PG-13 jokes. Here's another: some people here have their heads so far up their keisters that they find good-natured jokes far more offensive than the vile lies that atheists and other Christian-haters here spread on a regular basis. (Okay, so that wasn't a joke. Sue me. Or rather, “lightly mod” me.) They would rather that people see “God is a lie” than the word “bloody.”"
——
From a mod's reply:
—–
You have repeatedly made numerous violations which accumulated to 10 points. Worse yet, the exact violation that put you over the top… was the exact thing you had been warned for the week prior.
Anyone can make a mistake, only a fool repeats those, beratingly so.
——-
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 7:35 pm
Re: shilchie:
True, research and/or educational institutions funded in part or whole by State or Local funds are exempt from the FEDERAL Hatch Act. But, this does address the point of “free speech”. There are limitations to what you can say or do. It is not an absolute right. PZ's limitations would be in conforming to Minnesota rules and to the employment agreement or Faculty Handbook as they govern faculty conduct
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 9:19 pm
The Hatch Act only is a federal law and is absolutely not applicable in this case.
It's possible that this will run afoul of the faculty code of conduct ( http://www1.umn.edu/regents/policies/academic/C... ). That's up to the University. However, if what he is saying is disallowed, what he is doing is even more valuable since there is an opportunity to effect some real change.
Religious ideas do not deserve special respect.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 3:31 am
tjswift: if self-righteous, incoherent, jealous, unpopular arsewipe is a synonym for dyslexic then yes, you are dyslexic. Dr Meyers has attained more in his career than you will ever hope for, of that I am certain.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 3:38 am
“Apparently none. That
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 3:49 am
“so your whole argument revolves around which pc he is using when he is posting? While I don
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 4:50 am
Catholics have the right to worship in peace in this country and not have to worry that someone will come and desecrate what is sacred to them. He is violating that right. Who cares if you atheist's believe it or not! We have a constitutional right.
This person didn't get any REAL death threats and it's obvious in his demeanor. How dare he compare Catholics real heartbroken outcry to the insane frenzy of jihadists rioting in the streets, burning down property??!! And how stupid really!! That poor Danish cartoonist had to go into hiding and has since been burned to death. Cook is not going into hiding, and neither is Myers! You know he isn't. Nor does he need too.
If this person was really serious about his contempt for 'all' religion, let's see him tear up a koran in public. You know he wont because he is a coward.
However, no death threats are necessary in this case. He has handled something more dangerous to the ill willed then the Ark of the covenant was to purified priests and non-believers.
Catholics tell him that that is truly the body and blood of Christ, He should be take this seriously: just because you don't understand a thing, doesn't mean it isn't what it is. You can't see radioactivity. Radioactive items will kill you even if you aren't immediately burned. The Host is Spiritually radioactive. His soul is now irreversibly dying. When he leaves the veil of this world he will find his soul charred from radioactive poison.
Thats why he hasn't gotten any *real* threats (if he had any real threats he would have posted them like the Danish cartoonist did.) And why you don't see Catholic rioting in the streets, burning down buildings.
Because Catholics are the true Bride of Christ. We are lambs to the slaughter. We know that this is a sign of our coming persecution. We follow our crucified Lord to the cross, and this is the beginning of the American church's martyrdom. He is a sign that our constitutional rights are no longer going to be honored. America was a lovely interlude of religious freedom. Soon that will end. Soon it will be impossible for Catholics to worship in public at all as as it was in the beginning of our countries history and the British Penal laws were still in place. People like him will only be too happy to have those penal laws in place.
We know this is just the beginning. Soon more like this person will get bolder and more violent and eventually Catholics will have to Worship in smaller and more private settings. Already we have people from gay and lesbian activist groups disrupting Masses all over the country…..and they will only get bolder because of this. He is just a warning note to us to be ready.
dina
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 4:55 am
jinxmchue you said: 'The tone and spirit of his comments, if they were to come from a Christian, would not be tolerated in the least.'
you are right. But I have never heard this kind of thing from any other Christians, only ex-catholics, because no one can blaspheme like an ex-catholic. no one.
dina
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 5:08 am
But who knows, he might become like St. Paul…or Professor Joseph Pearce of Ave Maria University who was once a racist, hippie agnostic who also because of his protestant roots breathed fire at the church, and then God hit him in the head with a 2 by 10 and he is now a huge apologist for the faith.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Pearce
I will pray for his conversion. It should interesting.
Dina
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 5:13 am
“If he were a Christian educator blogging on the clock”
Actually, you seem to misunderstand the employment agreement that scientific faculty operate under. They are not on the clock per se, as they are salaried. They have an obligation to instruct a certain number of classes (most of the time. Some are there just for research) but the rest of the time is theirs for their research, or blogging, or whatever.
“Catholics have the right to worship in peace in this country and not have to worry that someone will come and desecrate what is sacred to them. “
Hmmm, I didn't see that codified in the first amendment. I don't see a cracker protection clause there anywhere. What I did see was a separation of church and state and a restriction on what restrictions can be applied to expression. I can burn bibles on my lawn and the worst I can get is slapped with fire code violation, because I can expression ideas you find inflamatory.
As the religious right has demonstrated ad naseum in this country is that anyone can be as inflammatory and hateful as they want and still find their expression protected. They can protest at the funeral of Mr. Rogers, the nicest man in our country's history, a positive and moral role model for millions and about the closest a public figure has gotten to expressing the tolerant ideals of one Jesus Christ, because he wouldn't use his program to denounce homosexuality. They can actively encourage the hate and discrimination of homosexuals, lobby to deny homosexuals equal rights, because expression is protected.
Just as a man has the right to desecrate a cracker.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 5:15 am
Dina: Can you offer a link that shows any of the 12 Danish cartoonists involved in the Muhammed controversy have “been burned to death”?
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 5:18 am
Sorry blackjack,
You can rant all you want, but no matter how many times you put “Dr.” in front of Meyers name, it won't change the fact that at 60 years of age he has attained the academic equivalent of supermarket bag boy and he is working at the equivalent of the Piggly-Wiggly in Borax Ca.
You morons that are so insistent on defending Meyers' pitiful record of academic mummery either a) are dumber than Meyers or b) realize that without the veneer of credibility that your protestations hope to convey to Meyers, you, he and every other PZian are clearly seen as nothing more than the bag of ignorant, spittle flecked assholes (with all the good ones picked out) that you are.
I suggest Meyers find an honorable bone and do the right thing by the students of the University of Minnesota, the parents who are under the mistaken impression that their kids are receiving a quality education in PZ
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 5:43 am
dina775: Wow. Was that rant for real? I have trouble any sentient human being could truly believe such nonsense. Brides of Christ? Lambs to slaughter? What the heck was that all about?
tjswift: Can one really become an Electrical Engineer without passing fourth grade Spelling? This country truly is going to hell…
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 6:35 am
While we'd love to keep the discussion, uh, spirited, it seems this thread is frequently crossing the line of civility. I'd prefer not to delete comments, but if the personal attacks continue, I'll start. Thanks.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 7:07 am
Silverfox wrote
“When you accept employment at a public university you agree not to behave in such a way as to reflect negatively on the university. When you offer to desecrate objects that are considered sacred to the deeply held religious beliefs of a significant number of the sutdent body at that university who are Catholics and when the dinegration of their religion may more others to tease or harass them, then you have created a hostile learning environment for a segment of the student body based on their religious identification. No public university can allow this to happen.”
That's knee-deep bullshit. When acerbic, unpopular, even offensive speech cannot be tolerated in a university, that university is dead. The main purpose of a university is to jostle, shake up, poke at, and vigorously question beliefs and claims, and thereby cause people to examine their pre-existing conceptions. To fail to do so is to leave them in the ignorance with which they arrived. I write that as a graduate (BA & PhD) of the U of Minnesota and a long-time professor at an excellent private liberal arts college. To be blunt, if some or most of my students aren't shaken up and even offended by what I have said in class, I've failed.
“Hostile learning environment” is new-speak for “don't make me think and leave me to wallow in my unfettered ignorance.”
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 8:05 am
I'm amazed at how much vitriol is spewed at a 60-year-old professor. Particularly when the guy is really only 51 (born March 9, 1957). I guess some people care more about attacking someone's credibility than doing it credibly.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 8:10 am
“To fail to do so is to leave them in the ignorance with which they arrived….To be blunt, if some or most of my students aren
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 8:13 am
Shorter rbh:
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 8:30 am
dina
“Catholics have the right to worship in peace in this country and not have to worry that someone will come and desecrate what is sacred to them.”
Uh, yeah. And that includes young Mr. Cook, who was manhandled and threatened within the walls of his own church, simply because he didn't swallow on time. He merely wanted to show the wafer to his friend who had accompanied him to the service and was curious about it. If he had been left alone, none of this would ever have happened.
“This person didn
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 9:29 am
Of course now everybody is waiting with bated breath to see what Myers will do to the cracker. But really I'm more interested in South Parks rendering of the story. It'll probably be something along the lines of the Fantastic Easter Special
.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 1:20 pm
Webster Cook leaves his church with a Eucharist intact and the world goes crazy. Catholics want to punish Mr. Cook in some kind of neo-inquisitionial fashion and liken his removal of a wafer to kidnapping.
From a news story:
“'It is hurtful,' said Father Migeul Gonzalez with the Diocese. 'Imagine if they kidnapped somebody and you make a plea for that individual to please return that loved one to the family.'”
From another news story:
“Minutes before the Mass began, Student Senator Webster Cook returned the Holy Eucharist he was holding hostage in a Ziploc bag ever since smuggling the blessed wafer of bread out of the Catholic Mass service Sunday, June 29.”
To someone like PZ Myers; kidnapping. smuggling, and holding a wafer (even if consecrated) hostage must have a ring of silliness. Especially, if like Myers, you do not believe in any god or religion. So, he commented on it in his blog. Now, the Catholic League wants him punished and fired because he wants to abuse a wafer or a cracker as he calls it.
If there is a god, then both Webster Cook and PJ Myers may fear for their eternal souls, but I can't help but think the overreaction of Catholics to both is ridiculous.
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 2:32 pm
Some are terribly offended. Ok, I get that. But would Jesus mock the U of Minnesota? Would Jesus threaten PZ with death? What about all those drops of wine that are spilled every Sunday during communion, does Jesus get upset with the waste of xxx pints of blood every week?
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 4:13 pm
jinxmchue quoting me:
Comment posted July 15, 2008 @ 5:58 pm
TJ,
As a fellow Engineer, are you dealing seriously with the evidence at hand?
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 3:11 am
Here
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 4:51 am
“Here's the evidence at hand”
Your evidence sounds a lot like speculation, and not even very good speculation. You are assuming both that someone had access to crackers, immediately went out and secured the cracker, and was in close enough proximity that the could deliver it to him personally or paid to overnight it to him. That seems like a lot of effort for just a cracker.
How many readers of a fairly blatant atheist blog are in the position to waltz into a catholic church and steal a waffer? How many actually have the balls to do so without giving themselves away because of nervousness, not because they fear the define wrath of crackers, but the mortal wrath of religious folks that will issue death threats over said crackers?
As an engineer you haven't really done a great deal of work considering the variables involved. Additionally you have been more than happy to caustically point out that you think MYERS (note the spelling, it has only been pointed out about two dozen times to you) is full of hate while ironically being far more hateful in your dialog about a fellow human being than Myers ever was about a cracker and those who idolize it. Your presentation of your viewpoints has reflected very poorly on yourself. You could have very easily presented your viewpoint in a much less caustic (and thus more receptive) tone, and if you are Christian (given your zeal over the issue that seems a fair assumption) you obviously haven't learned a whole lot from the teaching of Jesus (his sentiment is something believers and non-believers would both be well off emulating).
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 4:57 am
TJ,
A devastating demonstration of critical thinking skills – that guessing part is brilliant!!
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 5:34 am
Heh. We are talking about a nut case here folks, not an op-amp.
Unfortunately I cannot apply Thevenin's theorem to Meyers (It's just a frackin' collection of letters, I'll arrange them as I please); Kirchoff's law doesn't apply to crackpot assistant professors.
…but as “fellow” Engineers, I shouldn't have to point out the obvious to you.
We can however, encourage the aforementioned crackpot to put up or shut up, which is exactly what I'm doing, and doing very well thankyouverymuch.
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 5:51 am
TJ,
It is not obvious that reasoning stops when you cannot formulate an equation.
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 6:01 am
Blah, blah, blah.
It's time for Meyers to smash the cracker or admit he's afraid to do so. Which will be a tacit confession that it's not just a cracker after all.
Hell, tell the poor boob that I'll send him some peanut butter and jelly to use on it.
Crunchy, or smooth?
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 6:04 am
TJ,
Smooth for the ordinance, crunchy for the sacrament… it is obvious.
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 6:28 am
@tjswift, you forgot to close one element. Now everything after your jul 16 2008 10:34am comment is BOLD! I fixed that with an extra , I hope
.
As for Myers, give the man some time! He's been away on a conference for a couple days And surely, if you were him, you also would draw this out as long as you could. I know I would. We're all attention whores, after all.
Comment posted July 16, 2008 @ 7:42 pm
Aaaaaand now for some perspective: It's a cracker. PZ Myers had the audacity to threaten…..a cracker. And he didn't even threaten YOUR cracker, the one you're eating right now, or will eat next Sunday. He threatened a hypothetical cracker.
Even among other Christians (ie., pretty much every denomination except Catholicism), the claim that this cracker at the moment of blessing /literally/ becomes flesh (which is simultaneously undetectable in any way by scientific observation) is absolutely ridiculous. The Southern Baptists would laugh. The Presbyterians would snicker. The rest would look at their Catholic brethren in that sort of shamefaced way that they look to their drunken uncle and would whisper those simple words of perspective, “Uh, guys…it's just a symbolic gesture, it's not /really/ the body of Christ.”
Yes, PZ Myers is an atheist. He's also in agreement with pretty much every other human being on the planet (except Catholics) that it's just a freaking cracker.
Plenty of Catholics laugh and scoff at the idea that cows are sacred, while they desecrate beef by EATING it, if you can believe it. The gall! Please stop persecuting the Hindus, everyone.
Oh, but screw the Hindus, right? I mean….they are a significant minority in this country. And that's what this is really all about, isn't it?
Christianity is the majority religion in this country, so it deserves nothing but reverence and acceptance.
Well sorry, my opinion is that it's all a crock. It's a dog and pony show, the blind leading the blind…and it's an orchestra that is so well conducted that they've got some of us believing that snack food is divine. NOTHING is that good, I'm sorry.
Well, maybe sushi. But that's another topic.
Comment posted July 17, 2008 @ 5:42 am
Another day passes, and Meyers' captive “crackers” are still just sitting there on the table with their metaphorical fingers in Meyers' eye.
Comment posted July 17, 2008 @ 7:08 am
Does anyone hear something? Like the hysterical buzzing of an irrelevant gnat?
Hmmm, maybe it's just the wind.
Comment posted July 17, 2008 @ 10:57 am
doberman, the wind has a pleasing quality about it so I don't think that's it.
Comment posted July 17, 2008 @ 5:57 pm
Myers: “…The cracker is completely different. This is something that's freely handed out”
TRUTH: The Eucharist (communion) is handed out not “freely” as you state, but on the honor system. By walking up the the Priest or the Eucharistic Minister, hearing the words “The Body of Christ”, and returning the response, “Amen” is the same as saying, “I am a Catholic Christian who has been properly prepared for the reception of what I do believe to be the Body Blood Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ in Sacramental form under the species of bread.” Anyone who goes up to and receives the Eucharist with any other intention or under any other condition violates the honor system = violates their honor, and commits a sacrilege in the least. Someone with hostile intentions, especially if they involve other's in their dirty work violates their honor, the honor of the other, and certainly commits more than a sacrilege, aka, complete disrespect and dishonesty with regard to the sacred and divine.
Myers: “It won't be totally tasteless, but yeah, I'll do something that shows this cracker has no power.”
UNDERSTANDING: First of all, it's too late for trying not to be tasteless, the entire intention is beyond good taste, and completely uncreative. But Myers, you miss the point entirely. The power in the Eucharist is not something that can be measured in some sort of lab or by some sort of gesture. It is the power of grace and mercy at work. Consider an analogy which gets to the idea a little but even this does not speak fully of the reality. If you hold in your hand a seed, it appears to have no power, and indeed it is helpless in your hand and depends entirely on your good will to plant it in fertile soil, and water it. But once you do plant it in fertile soil, and nurture and water it, the power is released from the seed and it grows into a plant. Like this, the Eucharist, Christ himself in Sacramental form places Himself in your hands, and like a seed the power is unleashed wen planed in to the fertile soil, which is a person receiving the Eucharist with a heart of Faith. In this fertile soil the grace present in the Eucharist grows and strengthens the believer, as the believer nurtures this gift which he or she has received.
When you hold the Eucharist in your hand, you are holding the Sacramental (not simply Symbolic) presence of the Christ who willingly gave himself into the hands of those who hated him and were afraid of him. You can choose to do as they did insulting him and desecrating his body, and taking advantage of his meekness out of their hatred born of insecurity. Or you can act as Veronica did, wiping his face and holding the body of this one sacred whom all others where then despising.
Consider again this analogy. Is it not true that a Baby, held in your hands has no power over you? Rather, the child is completely at your disposal, and again helplessly dependent on your good intention. But if you do what is unthinkable and abuse this child's haplessness, and show that it has no 'power' over you, does it's personhood somehow disappear. Governor Schwarzenegger was a baby once, with complete dependency on his family, yet we all know that power was contained in him (for good of for ill, this is not a political statement).
Your intentions and potential actions will show nothing new about the power of the Eucharist. It will only show that you have missed the point entirely in the first place. And those who agree with you have a very limited view of power. Power itself, though fully present in the Eucharist, is not the point. If Jesus wanted to boast of his Omnipotence, he would have come in the form of a hammer, not food, not the form of bread. It speaks of the nature of this power.
“My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” 2 Corinthians 12:9
Does bread itself have might? It does when if is metabolized in the body of a strong person. Thus the Eucharist only has power when it is received by a person of faith, without faith the Eucharist can not be 'metabolized.' You cannot feed bread to a rock and expect the rock to split. Feed bread to a person with a hammer, and you will see the rock split. Feed the Eucharist to a person of Faith and you will see mountains moved, if you have eyes to see.
Comment posted July 18, 2008 @ 4:38 am
Day 10 since Meyers opened his gob. Score:
The “Cracker”: 10
PZ Meyers and his flying monkeys: ZERO
This is what comes when you put your faith in a crackpot that after a career of corn-ball quackery can't even earn enough respect to attain full Professorship at a corn-field extension college.
Kind of sad…heh, not really.
Comment posted July 18, 2008 @ 5:27 am
@perrinbrady:
Your quotations and explanations of the inner workings of the Catholic faith and sacraments are interesting, but aren't really the point here. PZ Myers originally objected to the entire notion that stealing a cracker could be considered a 'hate crime' or on par with 'kidnapping'. The student responsible has been threatened for a 'crime' that really only affects a cracker. Myers real thrust with his stated desire to commit cracker abuse was to stick a finger in the eye of the entire notion that there is a victim in cracker crime. After all, he's not a student who is at the mercy of the SGA or university authorities, who can be cowed into submission. He is an adult who in his personal life answers to no one, and has the freedom to make a statement…hence him asking someone to bring him a consecrated cracker, so he can demonstrate some real cracker abuse. The fact that no one has been able to score such a cracker yet is not all that surprising. Most of us atheists don't spend much time hanging around /any/ church, and considering the fervor and hysteria surrounding the Eucharist, it seems that even taking a few extra seconds to swallow it is viewed with suspicion and hostility (as happened in the original case that got this whole ball rolling). Soon as one of us gets our hands on one, I think a new wave of outrage will be pending.
I don't beleve in any of the things you posted. I'm in no way obligated to consider your beliefs sacred any more than you are required to consider the 69 virgins doctrine of Islam to be sacred, or that cows are sacred. In this country, you get to believe whatever you want (or nothing at all). Freedom /from/ religion is as much guaranteed as freedom /of/ religion. Atheists have a saying, “We're the same as you are, except we believe in one less god than you do.”
Until such time as Catholicism is the state religion, none of us are under any obligation to share your outrage over crimes committed against a snack food, nor should we ever be so ridiculous as to compare such a 'crime' to kidnapping or torture.
@tjswift: This is the only time I will address you directly, as judging by other posts of yours you are a professional troll on this site, spending most of your time during the day making childish posts that do nothing but attempt to glorify your own ego. I understand that you are upset by what Myers has threatened to do, and I understand your tactic. He's a professor, so you might as well attack his professional achievements and insult the UofM Morris as the only way you can conceive of to hurt his feelings as much as he has hurt yours. The desperation evident in your daily reminders that he still hasn't desecrated a cracker illustrates this plainly. No one believes you've actually researched his work, but no one really cares if you have. You've discredited your intelligence so many times in this thread alone that there is simply no point debating with you. It's like debating with a 2-year-old when the only thing you have to offer is a “Nyah nyah!” coupled with your fingers jammed in your ears. Some people might be drawn into that kind of frustrating, unproductive 'discussion', but not me.
Comment posted July 21, 2008 @ 5:27 am
Day 13 and those “crackers” remain as snug as a bug in a rug.
LOL!
If any of you PZians are still harboring some hope, let me put an end to your angst. Yes, children, you've all been punk'd.
PZ will set fire to his own hair before he so much as looks at those hosts cross-eyed. Why, you wonder?
Well it's simple, children.
PZ would lose his job. And the pickin's for extremely untalented, big mouthed kooks looking to land comfy teaching jobs are, well, very limited these days.
But don't despair PZians…let not your hearts be troubled! Just as sure as PZ will never desecrate an article of anyone's faith (yes, you can stop sending him Korans too), he will always keep his portal to lunacy open for business…it's his lifeline, his single claim to fame, and it's a lot cheaper than the intense psychoanalysis he'd need to settle down to anything approaching normalcy.
So by all means continue to post your spittle flecked amphigory, your artfully crafted photoshop renditions of your hearts desire, let your hatred pour forth from that evacuated space between your ears as the waters poured from Lake Delton.
PZ's playhouse is open for business.
Hahaaa!
Comment posted July 23, 2008 @ 1:03 pm
The bullshit that's flying here is hard to stomach, starting with this interview. Its a snapshot of a purportedly educated pillar of his academic community trying to pull anything and everything out of his ass to justify stunningly stupid statements.
He claims the student in Florida was the reason behind his current crusade to 'set things straight'. He claims he's outraged by the abuse this idiot has received, when it's apparent to anyone that the punk wasn't 'Catholic', and his intent all along was to do something that he knew, full well, would likely get him into serious trouble. In simple English, he wanted to get some kicks at the expense of a religious service (protected under our Constitution). This isn't 'freedom of speech', by any stretch, but a violation of this Catholic campus group to have the integrity of it's service protected from assholes.
Not much more than ~ 150 yrs ago, there were churches in many places in the US which, when built, had to take into account likely distances and trajectories of rocks thrown, whose targets were stained glass.
Any attempt at desecration of the Eucharist (like skipping out of a church with it for some campus show-and-tell, or doing what Myers has been contemplating with his 'protest') would have been met, in any place and at any time, with a forceful, and if necessary, physical response: check your history.
This isn't about 'fundamentalism', worldwide religious turmoil, or any of the other canards cited above.
Myers can exercise his choice to remain an aetheist, to think what he wishes.
He has no right, by any standard, to use his position as an academic, to exhort similar idiots to perfrom further mindless acts. Acts considered amazingly offensive to Catholics.
He doesn't like Catholics? He should check his employer's antidiscrimination guidelines before he opens his mouth again.
Comment posted July 23, 2008 @ 5:50 pm
For anyone that still cares, PZ has dealt the the cracker(s) in question.
Comment posted July 24, 2008 @ 6:26 am
The garbage that's flying here is hard to stomach, starting with this interview.
It
Comment posted July 25, 2008 @ 10:39 am
Time for you to target your frothing on the Pharyngula forums, TJ. Finally you can stop crowing about the cracker, because it has been well and thoroughly desecrated.
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/07/the_...
Comment posted July 30, 2008 @ 3:46 pm
Well it seems time to take this off of my bookmark list. TJ has nothing more to say.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment