At a press conference Thursday morning, Democratic party chairman Brian Melendez addressed the second quarter fundraising figures for Steve Sarvi, who is seeking to knock off incumbent Rep. John Kline. The DFL challenger brought in just $145,000 and had less than $100,000 cash on hand at the end of June. By comparison, Kline had more than $500,000 in the bank at the end of March. His campaign hasn’t yet released figures for the second quarter.
Melendez stated that at this point in the 2006 election cycle nobody gave Tim Walz much of a chance to knock off six-term incumbent Gil Gutknecht either. "When you’re running against an incumbent it’s always an uphill fight," he said. "But you know what? If you look at where the Sarvi campaign is right now, look at where the Walz campaign was two year ago, and you’ll see that they’re pretty comparable. Look at what happened there. I have a great deal of confidence that Steve Sarvi is going to be the next Congressman from the Second District."
A look back at Walz’s Federal Elections Commission filings from his successful 2006 campaign doesn’t entirely back up this assertion, however. In the second quarter of that year, the Minnesota National Guard veteran and school teacher took in $195,000 and had cash on hand heading into the summer of roughly $250,000. At that point in the election cycle he’d raised almost $200,000 more than Sarvi has during his current campaign.



4 Comments »
Comment posted July 11, 2008 @ 6:43 am
There is one other MAJOR difference - Walz had to buy advertising in Mankato/Rochester/Sioux Falls where Sarvi has to buy ad-time in Minneapolis/St. Paul, one of the 10-15 most expensive advertising markets in the country. For Sarvi to get the kind of media saturation that Walz had in 2006, he'd have to raise 2-3x more money…and that's just not gonna happen.
Comment posted July 11, 2008 @ 11:41 am
By emulating Walz, do you mean that Sarvi will make a lot of promises to his progressive base which he doesn
Comment posted July 11, 2008 @ 11:43 am
There is one other MAJOR difference - Walz had to buy advertising in Mankato/Rochester/Sioux Falls where Sarvi has to buy ad-time in Minneapolis/St. Paul, one of the 10-15 most expensive advertising markets in the country. For Sarvi to get the kind of media saturation that Walz had in 2006, he’d have to raise 2-3x more money…and that’s just not gonna happen.
Comment posted July 11, 2008 @ 4:41 pm
By emulating Walz, do you mean that Sarvi will make a lot of promises to his progressive base which he doesn
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment