Phyllis Kahn is among the most revered and reviled members of the state Legislature. Since first running for office in 1972, inspired by the feminist movement, she has established a formidable track record on environmental and scientific issues. She is perhaps best known for helping pass the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act in 1975, the first law in the country to restrict smoking in public places.
But Kahn, who is tied with Rep. Lyndon Carlson (DFL) of Crystal at the top of the state House seniority list, has also championed an array of eccentric causes – lowering the voting age to 16, taxing cosmetic surgery, studying the health effects of artificial turf – that have made her a piñata for conservative commentators. Pioneer Press columnist Joe Soucheray has referred to her variously over the years as “daffy,” a “career crackpot” and “scandalously selfish.”
So it’s little surprise that Kahn would face opposition in seeking a 19th legislative term. What no one really expected is that she would stir a fight from within her own party. At the DFL endorsing convention for House district 59B in March, Kahn was unanimously endorsed after failing to draw any opposition.
But that seemingly innocuous event inspired Joel Rainville, who is the marketing coordinator at the
Kahn has generally won re-election in the heavily Democratic district (75 percent voted for John Kerry in the 2004 presidential race) without much trouble. In 2006 she took 73 percent of the vote, despite Republican and Independence Party opposition. Two years earlier she easily staved off three opponents, collecting support from 59 percent of voters. In 2002 she ran unopposed after Green Party candidate Jason Samuels (a former intern in her office) was ruled ineligible because he lived two blocks outside the district when he registered for the campaign.
But Rainville should provide more formidable opposition than any of these recent challengers. He comes from a storied
These ties play into what’s arguably been the most controversial issue in the district in recent years, the proposed football stadium for
Joel Rainville says he’s not been involved in the stadium controversy, but he does offer criticism of Kahn’s role in the matter. “I do think that perhaps a little too much time of our state representative was spent on trying to find solutions at the state level,” he says. “I would say that perhaps it distracted from the work that could have been done to solve other problems at the state level.”
Kahn says that her involvement in the fracas has been overblown by the media. “Compared to the people who were really working on that, I was a totally minor player,” she says. “I’m not backing away from it, but there’s people who were spending an enormous amount of time on it.”
Rainville argues that Kahn’s involvement in such boutique issues has kept her from focusing sufficient attention on bread-and-butter matters like adequate funding for transportation, infrastructure and education. “What I’ve been hearing is there are a lot of people who think it’s time for a fresh perspective in the House,” he says. “I think perhaps it’s time that the person who represents this district focuses more on what the concerns of the residents of the district are.”
But Kahn points to numerous accomplishment from the last legislative session, including the transportation funding bill, a compensation package for survivors of the 35W bridge collapse and $70 million for the proposed Central Corridor light rail line. Another bill that she championed, which would have allowed the
Kahn seems nonplussed by the primary challenge. “Anyone has the right to file and run,” she says, noting that she’s never met Rainville. “I wouldn’t know him if I bumped into him on the street.”













12 Comments »
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 6:57 pm
In response to the post by Dan Duhamel, who I respect and admire, I would like to clarify a couple of things. First, Dan is not presently an officer of the DFL. He and Joel were last elected in 2006, and this cycle Dan chose to help his close friend Joel run for office. Personally I was shocked, saddened and confused to hear this news that Joel was running. I appreciate all the work Dan and Joel did previously. The DFL has had its internal disagreements in the past. This year was not one of those years. We had nearly unanimous agreement at this last convention. This is not a year of DFL division and this race seems to have come out of the blue in my opinion. At any rate, the people will decide this.
Also, to correct the record. As far as I know, the DLS supporters mentioned in the article are not trying to stir things up based on that issue. I don’t believe there is anything out there other than rumor and speculation that shows they have crossed the river from where they live to carry out some kind of vendetta against Phyllis and the DFL in 59. What would be the point? It certainly wouldn’t help Joel. I have yet to see any evidence that they have done anything of the sort. To imply that this is the case without a corroborating source is just poor journalism.
And as for Joe Soucheray, I will pray for him, but I am not sure it will be enough.
Comment posted July 12, 2008 @ 11:39 pm
The subhead on this article was seriously misleading. The answer is NO.
Joel stated clearly that Kahn’s perfunctory acceptance speech at the nominating convention finally pushed him into running.
The Independent needs to be a bit less sensational, and the readers need to, uh, actually read the article for comprehension.
Comment posted July 11, 2008 @ 11:20 pm
It is pretty clear to me that the people commenting above about the the “stadium” have entirely missed the point of the article. They do not differ on the stadium issue. In fact, Mr. Rainville has no interest in the stadium issue or at least has not been involved in it at all. Mr. Rainville, per the article above, is running because Ms. Kahn has lost touch with reality and what is happening now. Come on now, seriously, the effects of astro turf?? Give me a break. It is also my understanding that she is considering legislation that would make it legal for bicyclists to run red lights. I don’t think Ms. Kahn is dealing with real issues anymore. I agree that a fresh perspective is needed. I also know that this is a general feeling in much of the district. I for one am voting for Mr. Rainville. Ms. Khan really should retire. The sole reason for her longevity has been lack of serious competition in her district.
Comment posted July 10, 2008 @ 10:51 pm
To know more about Joel Rainville’s campaign, and the issues that are important to him, please visit http://www.joelrainville.com.
I have know Joel for many years and can tell you that he is not running because of the stadium issue. That is just one example of why it is time for a fresh perspective in 59B. It is important for a representative to be in touch with the issues that are important to their constituency and take those issues to the floor of the House of Representatives – not local issues that should be dealt with at the local level.
As an officer in Senate Distrit 59 DFL for the past 4 years, I know that Joel and Phyllis have met a number of times at various events. I also know that Joel has been very active in the local party unit for the past number of years, most recently serving as Secretary for the past 2 years. Active local elected officials throughout the district are quite familiar with Joel and the work that he has done for his community.
Again, to find out more about Joel and his campaign, please visit http://www.joelrainville.com.
Comment posted July 10, 2008 @ 8:46 pm
He’s running against her based on .. a …. football….. stadium.
And he thinks she doesn’t concentrate on the bigger picture.
Comment posted July 10, 2008 @ 2:31 pm
Without knowing more about Rainville’s positions, it’s hard to form an opinion. But if a division on the stadium issue is one of their bigger differences, I’m sticking with Kahn.
Comment posted July 10, 2008 @ 9:31 am
Without knowing more about Rainville's positions, it's hard to form an opinion. But if a division on the stadium issue is one of their bigger differences, I'm sticking with Kahn.
Comment posted July 10, 2008 @ 3:46 pm
He's running against her based on .. a …. football….. stadium.
And he thinks she doesn't concentrate on the bigger picture.
Comment posted July 10, 2008 @ 5:51 pm
To know more about Joel Rainville's campaign, and the issues that are important to him, please visit http://www.joelrainville.com.
I have know Joel for many years and can tell you that he is not running because of the stadium issue. That is just one example of why it is time for a fresh perspective in 59B. It is important for a representative to be in touch with the issues that are important to their constituency and take those issues to the floor of the House of Representatives – not local issues that should be dealt with at the local level.
As an officer in Senate Distrit 59 DFL for the past 4 years, I know that Joel and Phyllis have met a number of times at various events. I also know that Joel has been very active in the local party unit for the past number of years, most recently serving as Secretary for the past 2 years. Active local elected officials throughout the district are quite familiar with Joel and the work that he has done for his community.
Again, to find out more about Joel and his campaign, please visit http://www.joelrainville.com.
Comment posted July 11, 2008 @ 6:20 pm
It is pretty clear to me that the people commenting above about the the “stadium” have entirely missed the point of the article. They do not differ on the stadium issue. In fact, Mr. Rainville has no interest in the stadium issue or at least has not been involved in it at all. Mr. Rainville, per the article above, is running because Ms. Kahn has lost touch with reality and what is happening now. Come on now, seriously, the effects of astro turf?? Give me a break. It is also my understanding that she is considering legislation that would make it legal for bicyclists to run red lights. I don't think Ms. Kahn is dealing with real issues anymore. I agree that a fresh perspective is needed. I also know that this is a general feeling in much of the district. I for one am voting for Mr. Rainville. Ms. Khan really should retire. The sole reason for her longevity has been lack of serious competition in her district.
Comment posted July 12, 2008 @ 6:39 pm
The subhead on this article was seriously misleading. The answer is NO.
Joel stated clearly that Kahn's perfunctory acceptance speech at the nominating convention finally pushed him into running.
The Independent needs to be a bit less sensational, and the readers need to, uh, actually read the article for comprehension.
Comment posted July 14, 2008 @ 1:57 pm
In response to the post by Dan Duhamel, who I respect and admire, I would like to clarify a couple of things. First, Dan is not presently an officer of the DFL. He and Joel were last elected in 2006, and this cycle Dan chose to help his close friend Joel run for office. Personally I was shocked, saddened and confused to hear this news that Joel was running. I appreciate all the work Dan and Joel did previously. The DFL has had its internal disagreements in the past. This year was not one of those years. We had nearly unanimous agreement at this last convention. This is not a year of DFL division and this race seems to have come out of the blue in my opinion. At any rate, the people will decide this.
Also, to correct the record. As far as I know, the DLS supporters mentioned in the article are not trying to stir things up based on that issue. I don't believe there is anything out there other than rumor and speculation that shows they have crossed the river from where they live to carry out some kind of vendetta against Phyllis and the DFL in 59. What would be the point? It certainly wouldn't help Joel. I have yet to see any evidence that they have done anything of the sort. To imply that this is the case without a corroborating source is just poor journalism.
And as for Joe Soucheray, I will pray for him, but I am not sure it will be enough.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment