<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pawlenty will be on presidential ballot, says half of Minnesota in poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/45413/pawlenty-president-poll-rasmussen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/45413/pawlenty-president-poll-rasmussen</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media. » Pawlenty will be &#8230; &#124; Job Fair News</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/45413/pawlenty-president-poll-rasmussen/comment-page-1#comment-39756</link>
		<dc:creator>Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media. » Pawlenty will be &#8230; &#124; Job Fair News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=45413#comment-39756</guid>
		<description>[...] more here: Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media. » Pawlenty will be &#8230;   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here: Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media. » Pawlenty will be &#8230;   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/45413/pawlenty-president-poll-rasmussen/comment-page-1#comment-39726</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=45413#comment-39726</guid>
		<description>That 56% approval rating shows one thing: we have an awful lot of low-information voters in this state. If people were paying attention, the numbers would be a lot lower. Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 56% approval rating shows one thing: we have an awful lot of low-information voters in this state. If people were paying attention, the numbers would be a lot lower. Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

