This is some extremely shoddy journalism from Mickey Kaus. The Slate blogger asks if “ACORN chicanery” elected Sen. Al Franken, who won a razor-thin 2008 race for the U.S. Senate after eight months of legal challenges. Kaus links a “tactfully phrased Minneapolis Star Tribune story” to argue that fraudulent votes might have stolen the election for Franken.
ACORN claimed to have registered 48,000 new Minnesota voters. If just 1% were ineligible but cast ballots, or had ballots cast for them illegally, and survived the recount process … that’s 480 votes, almost certainly overwhelmingly cast for Franken.
Let’s look at this.
First, the story Kaus links to is actually a column by the conservative Katherine Kersten, whom the paper refers to as “a Twin Cities writer and speaker,” and who limns the column with attacks on the “liberal agenda.” Kersten has no proof that any illegitimate votes were cast, only that “Minnesota’s laws on proof of voter eligibility are notoriously loose.”
Second, “surviving the recount process” in Minnesota was more difficult than it sounds now. Ballots were counted once and recounted twice, and challenged ballots were counted in a hearing that was streamed live. Republicans had a lot of time, and a lot of incentive, to make the cause that thousands of ballots were illegitimate. They made their case. They narrowly lost.
Franken doesn’t have to face voters again until 2014, so the attempt to smear him here is just a way of draining the ACORN story for all it’s worth and casting illegitimacy on the Democrats’ Senate majority. It’s one thing for, say, Newsmax to engage in this; I am mystified as to why Kaus would do it. From arguing that the 2000 election was stolen from Al Gore by blocked recounts to arguing that ACORN maybe, kinda-sorta, might have registered an illegal voter in Minnesota. Strange.
Todd Herman, who runs new media at the RNC, heartily endorses the ACORN-Franken conspiracy.
UPDATE: Media Matters reports that, in addition to Slate, The Fox Nation and Gateway Pundit have picked up Kersten’s opinion piece to “baselessly cast doubt on Franken’s campaign victory.”
David Weigel is a politics reporter for the Washington Independent.














14 Comments »
Comment posted September 29, 2009 @ 12:38 pm
I hope he did steal an election. He’s only a Senator. George W. Bush stole two elections for POTUS!
Comment posted September 29, 2009 @ 1:33 pm
So far, no one has done any more than link ACORN workers to false registrations, meaning registrations for “voters” named “Mickey Mouse” and the like. On the other hand, we have proven instances in Florida and Ohio of right wing operatives holding public office scrubbing legitimate voters from the lists of registered voters, mostly based on race. So guess who gets accused of “voter fraud”?
Isn’t it time for the media, including the Minnesota Independent, to start pointing out these obvious examples of lying and hypocrisy among certain individuals? When you see an individual walking down the street or in a public place angrily shouting and arguing with nobody else there, you know this person is mentally ill or deranged. How it is any different with people who babble like this in public spaces, like Bachmann, this Tod Herman guy or Katherine Kersten? Why should everyone be polite to these people by calling them “conservatives”?
Comment posted September 29, 2009 @ 1:46 pm
I kind of “cheated” to get Franken some extra votes… I drove some elderly DFLers to the polls and waited in line with them to vote and then took them home. With my vote that represented at least 6 Franken votes which if we divide them into the final 312 votes that won means that me and my conspiracy of doddering old people represented around 2% of Franken’s victory total. Ain’t democracy grand? Jeez are Republicans asshats or what?
Comment posted September 29, 2009 @ 1:56 pm
Looks like the GOP is clearing the way for Norm Coleman’s entry into the governor’s race through the “Normie wuz robbed!” meme.
Comment posted September 29, 2009 @ 4:01 pm
There was a huge legal review of the election. Didn’t Kaus hear about that? Our State Supreme Court declared the election fair, and Franken to be the winner.
That some Slate lightweight named Kaus reads our local lightweight, Kersten – first mistake there – and then pretends to do a statistical analysis of the effect of an alleged ACORN fraud on the election – though THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE of ACORN misbehaving in Minnesota … for if there was, the Republicans would surely have brought it to the attention of the Court in the election contest imposed on us all by Mr Coleman … must be a day Kaus was without zany Bachmann quotes to drool over, or Palin photos to ogle … or something. Kaus should be embarassed.
Comment posted September 29, 2009 @ 4:52 pm
This is why the Strib’s legitimizing of Katherine Kersten was so odious from the start. Without the columnist gig she’d be just another blogger in the wilderness, but the Strib did an affirmative reactionary hire leapfrogging a mediocrity into a job senior journalists would kill for. Then the Strib never fact checked her other than for libel.
Long-time blogger Suzie Madrak is saying that ACORN is the new code speak for the “n” word. I ran Kersten’s Franken/ACORN post through Wordle.net and this was the result:
http://norwegianity.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/kkacorn.jpg
Wordle’s a somewhat whimsical tool, but it outs clumsy propagandists like nothing else can.
Comment posted September 30, 2009 @ 7:45 am
Did you see his ridiculous update? Why he’s just asking questions, is all! Without any facts! Which of course leads one to wonder: When was the last time Mickey performed cunnilingus on a member of the goat species?
Comment posted September 30, 2009 @ 8:45 am
Franken won’t win a second term, so who even cares?
Comment posted September 30, 2009 @ 9:11 am
dont you know that the political parties call people and have them write letters?
Comment posted September 30, 2009 @ 4:25 pm
The Strib used to be a newspaper. It is now a right wing rag that just spews the daily talking points of the Republi-thug party.
Slate used to have interesting material.
I am so tired of all this. Put it to bed! We won, you lost. Get over it.
Comment posted September 30, 2009 @ 5:28 pm
The Minnesota Secretary of State, Mark Ritchie, has consistently ignored evidence presented to him regarding problems with voter registration in Minnesota, including
· thousands of voter records that have an exact match on the criteria of first name, middle name, last name and birth year;
· several thousand voters registered after August 1, 1983, that had birth years suggesting these individuals are 108 years of age or older;
· nearly 2,000 individuals who appear to have registered and voted before the age of 18;
· thousands of individuals flagged as deceased are still on the active voter rolls;
· the discovery by Fox 9 News of 100 convicted felons who had newly registered to vote in 2008. Some were registered while in prison, suggesting someone else may have registered in their name.
Sooo . . . isn’t that a lot for Mr. Ritchie to be sweeping under the rug? What does HE have to hide?
Comment posted October 1, 2009 @ 7:44 am
Dennis –
Thousands and thousands and hundreds?
Where is this evidence?
Comment posted October 1, 2009 @ 11:26 am
Dennis, I take it you support the legislature funding the counties so they can purge their voter rolls everytime somone dies or moves? Because those are your 108-year-old voters and duplicate registrations. And, like it or not, felons who’ve served their time can vote in Minnesota. It’s called serving your time. If you want an Islamic system in which felons are marked for life by losing a hand or being branded, just say so.
And to echo Thomas, yes, I would love to see your evidence on your other claims. Someone on TV saying something isn’t proof, you know.
Comment posted October 6, 2009 @ 4:20 pm
Mark, I support counties and the State doing the jobs that they are already amply paid to perform!
Convicted felons may vote in Minnesota if they are no longer on parole or probation. Do you imagine that ACORN, or anyone else, is checking those voter registrations thoroughly?
As to the evidence, a summary is provided on-line at http://www.minnesotamajority.org/TheIssues/ElectionIntegrity/tabid/188/Default.aspx
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment