<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ward Eleven: Three vie for Benson&#8217;s South Minneapolis seat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/46195/ward-eleven-three-vie-for-bensons-south-minneapolis-council-seat/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/46195/ward-eleven-three-vie-for-bensons-south-minneapolis-council-seat</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredric Markus</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/46195/ward-eleven-three-vie-for-bensons-south-minneapolis-council-seat/comment-page-1#comment-40480</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredric Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=46195#comment-40480</guid>
		<description>I could say that I support John Quincy because he is balding and does a fair imitation of a teapot (&quot;short and stout&quot;). But then I&#039;m all three of the above, so my bias is pretty evident. More to the point, I know that John was a leading figure in the decision by St. Stephens&#039; parish council to depart the premises rather than accept blatantly homophobic instructions emanating from the Roman Catholic Archbishopric. 

As a former Papal seminarian, a gay man of senior years, and a fairly cogent student of these matters, I feel very strongly about conservative intransigence over well-established understandings about the nuances of human sexuality. Wrong-headed and antidiluvian are far too mild descriptors of papal revanchism in these matters and I think highly of John Q. for having voted with his feet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could say that I support John Quincy because he is balding and does a fair imitation of a teapot (&#8220;short and stout&#8221;). But then I&#8217;m all three of the above, so my bias is pretty evident. More to the point, I know that John was a leading figure in the decision by St. Stephens&#8217; parish council to depart the premises rather than accept blatantly homophobic instructions emanating from the Roman Catholic Archbishopric. </p>
<p>As a former Papal seminarian, a gay man of senior years, and a fairly cogent student of these matters, I feel very strongly about conservative intransigence over well-established understandings about the nuances of human sexuality. Wrong-headed and antidiluvian are far too mild descriptors of papal revanchism in these matters and I think highly of John Q. for having voted with his feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

