<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: St. Tim: Enough with the canonizing of Russert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hartman_john</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert/comment-page-1#comment-6506</link>
		<dc:creator>hartman_john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4646#comment-6506</guid>
		<description>Tim Russert was a tv star.  Anything he may or may not have contributed to journalism is lost in what he contributed to NBC&#039;s bottom line.  While he may not have started out being concerned with the NBC News profits, in the end he, like all commercial television personalities, eventually succumbed to the proposition that &quot;what&#039;s good gor GE is good for America.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The journey from idealized dedication to journalistic integrity to shill for network advertisers is a short one.  Notice that now NBC has hired Russert&#039;s son as an analyst.  The first time you are picked up at your midtown Manhattan townhouse by the NBC limo because you&#039;re too important to drive your own car is when you begin the rapid run down the slippery slope of sell-out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Russert was a tv star.  Anything he may or may not have contributed to journalism is lost in what he contributed to NBC&#39;s bottom line.  While he may not have started out being concerned with the NBC News profits, in the end he, like all commercial television personalities, eventually succumbed to the proposition that &#8220;what&#39;s good gor GE is good for America.&#8221;</p>
<p>The journey from idealized dedication to journalistic integrity to shill for network advertisers is a short one.  Notice that now NBC has hired Russert&#39;s son as an analyst.  The first time you are picked up at your midtown Manhattan townhouse by the NBC limo because you&#39;re too important to drive your own car is when you begin the rapid run down the slippery slope of sell-out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hemigurl</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert/comment-page-1#comment-6505</link>
		<dc:creator>hemigurl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4646#comment-6505</guid>
		<description>Tim Russert was a gentleman.  He was a good family man, father and a good son to his father.  Because he did not smear every conservative person he came in contact with, does not make him a bad journalist.  There are journalist that give a balanced report of events and this does not make them bad journalist, just more honest and nonjudgemental.  The liberal media cannot tolerate any view other than their own.  If the reports do not say what they want to hear, they smear the reporter.  We should have more Tim Russets in this world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The liberal media that &quot;outed&quot; the CIA agent certainly was too concerned about the nation&#039;s security.  But then again causing a scandal is higher on their priority list than worrying about the safety of a CIA agent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Russert was a gentleman.  He was a good family man, father and a good son to his father.  Because he did not smear every conservative person he came in contact with, does not make him a bad journalist.  There are journalist that give a balanced report of events and this does not make them bad journalist, just more honest and nonjudgemental.  The liberal media cannot tolerate any view other than their own.  If the reports do not say what they want to hear, they smear the reporter.  We should have more Tim Russets in this world.</p>
<p>The liberal media that &#8220;outed&#8221; the CIA agent certainly was too concerned about the nation&#39;s security.  But then again causing a scandal is higher on their priority list than worrying about the safety of a CIA agent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erichvieth</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert/comment-page-1#comment-6504</link>
		<dc:creator>erichvieth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4646#comment-6504</guid>
		<description>I agree entirely with your post.  Russert fulfilled the role of question READER, but that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree entirely with your post.  Russert fulfilled the role of question READER, but that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charliequimby</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert/comment-page-1#comment-6503</link>
		<dc:creator>charliequimby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4646#comment-6503</guid>
		<description>The uncritical Blog House made me want to hurl. Glad it made you want to write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The uncritical Blog House made me want to hurl. Glad it made you want to write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wabbit</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert/comment-page-1#comment-6502</link>
		<dc:creator>wabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4646#comment-6502</guid>
		<description>A very good commentary, and I agree completely.  Russert was the establishment, and while he often kept the establishment honest he could also be used to create a veneer of honesty that was not appropriate.  Washingtoon is all about that kind of manipulation, and Russert played his role.  I&#039;m sure he was a great guy, but in the end he was a tool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do not feel guilty about taking him on, either, since your timing is perfect.  The old Celtic tradition is to never speak ill of the dead until they are buried, which is to say when their souls have gone on to the land of the dead.  You do this because you don&#039;t want a haunting.  Once they&#039;ve crossed over, you can say what you want.  And I&#039;m glad you did, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good commentary, and I agree completely.  Russert was the establishment, and while he often kept the establishment honest he could also be used to create a veneer of honesty that was not appropriate.  Washingtoon is all about that kind of manipulation, and Russert played his role.  I&#39;m sure he was a great guy, but in the end he was a tool.</p>
<p>Do not feel guilty about taking him on, either, since your timing is perfect.  The old Celtic tradition is to never speak ill of the dead until they are buried, which is to say when their souls have gone on to the land of the dead.  You do this because you don&#39;t want a haunting.  Once they&#39;ve crossed over, you can say what you want.  And I&#39;m glad you did, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiram</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert/comment-page-1#comment-6501</link>
		<dc:creator>hiram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4646#comment-6501</guid>
		<description>But he was a working class guy. And he came from Buffalo. And he was always, always, well prepared.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tim Russert was by all accounts a nice guy. But he was the classic establishment journalist who knew the questions to ask and who should and especially who should not be allowed to answer them. Tim in recent days has been described as lawyerly even prosecutorial in his approach. There is a lot to that. Tim never seemed that interested in finding the right answer, or the true answer, he was in search of the consistent answer, the one that agreed with or reconciled the respondent&#039;s earlier statements or the statements of someone else.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There has been a vast amount of praise for Tim&#039;s work from other establishment journalists who practice his style of journalism. In praising Tim, they often seemed to be praising themselves in these times when there role in our national discourse is under pressure and seems to be receding. For these folks, Tim is a saint not because he was a wonderful guy, which he might very well have been, but because they need him to be one, to justify their own way of doing business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But he was a working class guy. And he came from Buffalo. And he was always, always, well prepared.</p>
<p>Tim Russert was by all accounts a nice guy. But he was the classic establishment journalist who knew the questions to ask and who should and especially who should not be allowed to answer them. Tim in recent days has been described as lawyerly even prosecutorial in his approach. There is a lot to that. Tim never seemed that interested in finding the right answer, or the true answer, he was in search of the consistent answer, the one that agreed with or reconciled the respondent&#39;s earlier statements or the statements of someone else.</p>
<p>There has been a vast amount of praise for Tim&#39;s work from other establishment journalists who practice his style of journalism. In praising Tim, they often seemed to be praising themselves in these times when there role in our national discourse is under pressure and seems to be receding. For these folks, Tim is a saint not because he was a wonderful guy, which he might very well have been, but because they need him to be one, to justify their own way of doing business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlisi</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert/comment-page-1#comment-6500</link>
		<dc:creator>tlisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4646#comment-6500</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one thing to be tired of everyone in television talking about Tim Russert, but all the hoopla in the news media is a testament to his influence. I would not judge one of the most prolific careers in journalism through one decision to not get involved in a political scandal. Russert was clearly backing out of involvement in a presidential scandal to save his own reputation as a fair journalist, which yes, has its ethical dilemmas. But the great American journalists were not feared by their counterparts, quite the opposite. You should listen to more of him instead of all the people talking about him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s one thing to be tired of everyone in television talking about Tim Russert, but all the hoopla in the news media is a testament to his influence. I would not judge one of the most prolific careers in journalism through one decision to not get involved in a political scandal. Russert was clearly backing out of involvement in a presidential scandal to save his own reputation as a fair journalist, which yes, has its ethical dilemmas. But the great American journalists were not feared by their counterparts, quite the opposite. You should listen to more of him instead of all the people talking about him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hartman_john</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert/comment-page-1#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>hartman_john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4646#comment-5374</guid>
		<description>Tim Russert was a tv star.  Anything he may or may not have contributed to journalism is lost in what he contributed to NBC&#039;s bottom line.  While he may not have started out being concerned with the NBC News profits, in the end he, like all commercial television personalities, eventually succumbed to the proposition that &quot;what&#039;s good gor GE is good for America.&quot;



The journey from idealized dedication to journalistic integrity to shill for network advertisers is a short one.  Notice that now NBC has hired Russert&#039;s son as an analyst.  The first time you are picked up at your midtown Manhattan townhouse by the NBC limo because you&#039;re too important to drive your own car is when you begin the rapid run down the slippery slope of sell-out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Russert was a tv star.  Anything he may or may not have contributed to journalism is lost in what he contributed to NBC&#8217;s bottom line.  While he may not have started out being concerned with the NBC News profits, in the end he, like all commercial television personalities, eventually succumbed to the proposition that &#8220;what&#8217;s good gor GE is good for America.&#8221;</p>
<p>The journey from idealized dedication to journalistic integrity to shill for network advertisers is a short one.  Notice that now NBC has hired Russert&#8217;s son as an analyst.  The first time you are picked up at your midtown Manhattan townhouse by the NBC limo because you&#8217;re too important to drive your own car is when you begin the rapid run down the slippery slope of sell-out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hemigurl</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert/comment-page-1#comment-5375</link>
		<dc:creator>hemigurl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4646#comment-5375</guid>
		<description>Tim Russert was a gentleman.  He was a good family man, father and a good son to his father.  Because he did not smear every conservative person he came in contact with, does not make him a bad journalist.  There are journalist that give a balanced report of events and this does not make them bad journalist, just more honest and nonjudgemental.  The liberal media cannot tolerate any view other than their own.  If the reports do not say what they want to hear, they smear the reporter.  We should have more Tim Russets in this world.



The liberal media that &quot;outed&quot; the CIA agent certainly was too concerned about the nation&#039;s security.  But then again causing a scandal is higher on their priority list than worrying about the safety of a CIA agent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Russert was a gentleman.  He was a good family man, father and a good son to his father.  Because he did not smear every conservative person he came in contact with, does not make him a bad journalist.  There are journalist that give a balanced report of events and this does not make them bad journalist, just more honest and nonjudgemental.  The liberal media cannot tolerate any view other than their own.  If the reports do not say what they want to hear, they smear the reporter.  We should have more Tim Russets in this world.</p>
<p>The liberal media that &#8220;outed&#8221; the CIA agent certainly was too concerned about the nation&#8217;s security.  But then again causing a scandal is higher on their priority list than worrying about the safety of a CIA agent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erichvieth</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/4646/st-tim-enough-with-the-canonizing-of-russert/comment-page-1#comment-5376</link>
		<dc:creator>erichvieth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnesotaindependent.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/?p=4646#comment-5376</guid>
		<description>I agree entirely with your post.  Russert fulfilled the role of question READER, but that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree entirely with your post.  Russert fulfilled the role of question READER, but that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
