
Al Flowers
Al Flowers believes the cops are out to get him. The mayoral candidate filed a lawsuit in Hennepin County District Court Wednesday alleging that Hennepin County Sheriff’s deputies violated his Constitutional rights while executing a search warrant at an Edina home last month.
Flowers was present during the raid and was ticketed for possessing a small amount of marijuana. But the Minneapolis resident insists that the pot wasn’t his and that officers set him up because he was advising people at the residence of their rights. Flowers also claims that the cops improperly seized his laptop computer and $240 in cash.
“It is unfortunate that this is a temptation for law enforcement, to steal cash from people at scenes like this one, assuming that they lack the know-how, clout or finances to be able to get it back,” the lawsuit states. “Or worse yet, believing that the courts will not believe a black person against the word of law enforcement — who will undoubtedly claim it was not taken.”
Flowers alleges that the citation is part of a pattern of harassment from public employees. In July his house was condemned by city inspectors, purportedly because the waters was shut off, an assertion that Flowers disputed at the time.
“From day one of this campaign, we told Minneapolis voters that ‘opponents of change’ would use every tactic under the sun to discredit our campaign and silence the many citizens who are demanding more from status quo politicians,” Flowers said in a press release regarding the pot bust. “This latest accusation was not only expected, but comes at a time when incumbents with no vision for the future typically launch ‘October Surprises.’”
Flowers is seeking the return of his property and more than $50,000 in damages. Hennepin County Sheriff’s deputies Joe Poidinger, Matt Lunde and Erik Fleck are named as defendants in the case.
“There’s no allegation that he had marijuana on his person,” says Jill Clark, the attorney handling the case. “There’s no allegation it was in his pocket. It was found in a house that he had been in.”
Flowers has sued the city numerous times over the years, including a lawsuit against Minneapolis City Council member Don Samuels filed earlier this year. In 2007 he won a $3 judgment against the city for violating his free speech rights.
Flowers is among 10 challengers looking to unseat Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak. He is running as a Democrat, but does not have the party’s endorsement.













7 Comments »
Comment posted October 7, 2009 @ 4:09 pm
Of course he is going to be a target…
Is he white? No.
Is he rich? No.
Is he powerful within the current administration? No.
Go get ‘em Al! Stand your ground.
Comment posted October 7, 2009 @ 4:32 pm
Really humorous thread about this over in the Minneapolis Issues List:
http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/mpls/messages/topic/66AnyYD7BEBzKIDiFWcwjk
Comment posted October 7, 2009 @ 4:56 pm
Two blunts? We used a multi-jurisdictional task force to “bust” someone for two blunts? And we need MORE police in this state?? Seems they have nothing to do as is.
Me thinks this task force was watching this “known gang member” (another assault on 4th amendment rights, this business of labeling people as “known” this or that in lieu of proper warrants establishing probable cause. They saw Flowers was at the residence and they jumped at the chance to embarrass a person who sits on a police relations panel.
Comment posted October 7, 2009 @ 6:27 pm
@Wow: No, they didn’t use the resources to target him for 2 blunts. They were executing a search warrant on a known gangmember/drug dealer. Al Flowers just *happened* to be there and allegedly caught with 2 blunts.
Comment posted October 8, 2009 @ 1:52 pm
Just how does one become a “known” this or that, MeganG? The article, and others I have read, have not mentioned charges and only mention a small amount of marijuana as being found.
This business of “known” this or that is following the lead of the Patriot Act in that probable cause as to legal wrongdoing is not needed to be implicated as a “known member” of some insidious group or organization. It completely bypasses the constitution and 4th amendment protections.
My point being: it costs BILLIONS in this nation each year to wage this war on drugs. Examples like this show that often the police work involved does not result in greater public safety, as only a minuscule amount of pot was found. How long did they do “surveillance” to make this huge bust? What were the fiscal costs? More importantly, how long are people going to allow the government unfettered access into every detail of their lives under the guise of “safety?”
Comment posted October 12, 2009 @ 12:33 pm
Ending the drug war will do much good. Among other things, ending the drug war will remove a tool for corrupt cops to intimidate and harass political opponents, if indeed this is the case in this instance.
Comment posted October 14, 2009 @ 12:34 pm
“Really humorous thread about this over in the Minneapolis Issues List:
http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/mpls/messages/topic/66AnyYD7BEBzKIDiFWcwjk”
Thank you for reminding me why I unsubscribed to that forum: the widespread paranoia and stupidity coupled with logical illiteracy.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment