Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, perhaps the only Minnesota politician with the word “peace” in his job title, says the Nobel Peace Prize for President Obama is “deeply problematic. It rewards rhetoric over substance.” The prize may have been awarded in expectation of more bold action, says Nelson-Pallmeyer, who hopes the honor spurs fundamental change in United States foreign policy.
Nelson-Pallmeyer, assistant professor of justice and peace studies at the University of St. Thomas, sees Obama’s prize as a symbol and symptom of the “great relief” felt by people in America and around the world that what he terms “the period of the Great Revulsion” — the Bush administration — is over.
But the president so far hasn’t measured up to the broad hopes he stirred, Nelson-Pallmeyer told the Minnesota Independent via email:
Obama’s message of hope and change resonate with many, but the desire for authentic hope and real change are deeper than Obama’s words and far deeper than his actions to date. The Nobel Committee may be attempting to encourage the President to act more boldly.
As a politician, Nelson-Pallmeyer twice pressed peace and other progressive issues all the way to DFL Party endorsing conventions — for Congress in 2006 and U.S. Senate in 2008, before finally giving way to Keith Ellison and Al Franken, respectively.
By the time Obama took office, Nelson-Pallmeyer was already worried that progressive efforts to influence his position on war in Afghanistan were too late. The announcement of the Nobel Peace Prize for Obama finds Nelson-Pallmeyer still holding out a little hope:
Escalating wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan based on inflating the almost non-existent threat of al Qaida will continue to bankrupt the country morally and financially. … One can only hope that receiving the prize will encourage Obama to fundamentally change the direction of U.S. foreign policies under his watch. Without such a change in course, the period of hope following the Great Revulsion will likely give way to the period of the Great Disappointment.













6 Comments »
Pingback posted October 9, 2009 @ 6:17 pm
[...] Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media. » Jack Nelson … [...]
Comment posted October 11, 2009 @ 12:43 pm
I hope it doesn’t keep either Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer or Rush Limbaugh up at night worrying about why the Nobel Peace Prize Commmittee sees things differently than they do.
Comment posted October 11, 2009 @ 6:47 pm
The Nobel Peace Prize was waiting for Obama.
So, Obama join Jimmy Carter, Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt. For Alfred Nobel this price was dedicate to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses. Is there a better definition of Obama’s work since he was elected when comparing to Bush? Obama’s Nobel price is a small help to promote humanism in a world needing it badly.
It’s a myth that the prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace and human rights only after they have proven successful. It is often awarded to help good behaviour. The Norwegian Nobel Committee praised Obama’s pledges to reduce the world’s number of nuclear arms, ease American conflicts with Muslim nations and strengthen the American role in combating climate change. The Committee noted the global optimism created by his calls for peace and cooperation.
This price rewards the dove, fighting daily with world predators. Not only did it put in the spotlight the greatest political turn of the 21e century but it includes a bonus price. It can also be seen as a “down payment” on great expectations. Last Friday, we were all Norwegian.
Comment posted October 12, 2009 @ 10:12 am
Isn’t this a little like the feminist freshmen willing to put her male English professor through hell over personal pronouns but unwilling to say squat to the Frat Boys yucking it up and whistling at the girls going by? I respect the good professor but think that our President deserved the Peace Prize because the committee gave it to him after much deliberation. They decided the issue and for us to second guess them is a bit more than pointless. Its’ doing Rush’s work for him.
Comment posted October 12, 2009 @ 10:33 am
Yasser Arafat won one too, nuf’ said.
Comment posted October 14, 2009 @ 11:36 am
Go Jack! You got that right!
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment