<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rossbach wins Maplewood mayoral contest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/48884/rossbach-wins-maplewood-mayoral-contest/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/48884/rossbach-wins-maplewood-mayoral-contest</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hafner</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/48884/rossbach-wins-maplewood-mayoral-contest/comment-page-1#comment-42642</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hafner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=48884#comment-42642</guid>
		<description>The Minnesota Independent newspaper has a blog policy which states that &quot;Commenters assuming the identities of others or creating multiple identities in an effort to deceive are subject to removal.&quot;
Both of the ascertions in this policy are generally inaccurate and based on false assumptions. Most bloggers simply wish to remain &quot;anonymous.&quot; Once bloggers identify themselves they lose the ability (and their right) to remain &quot;anonymous&quot; in subsequent blogs.
Such a policy opens up the potential for all kinds of abuse. Censorship and the invasion of individuals&#039; privacy are two specific examples. This is a poor policy and should be removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Minnesota Independent newspaper has a blog policy which states that &#8220;Commenters assuming the identities of others or creating multiple identities in an effort to deceive are subject to removal.&#8221;<br />
Both of the ascertions in this policy are generally inaccurate and based on false assumptions. Most bloggers simply wish to remain &#8220;anonymous.&#8221; Once bloggers identify themselves they lose the ability (and their right) to remain &#8220;anonymous&#8221; in subsequent blogs.<br />
Such a policy opens up the potential for all kinds of abuse. Censorship and the invasion of individuals&#8217; privacy are two specific examples. This is a poor policy and should be removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

