Last July, the Freedom from Religion Foundation filed suit to prevent the words “In God We Trust” and “one nation under God” from being engraved on a wall in the U.S. Capitol Visitors Center. Today, 41 U.S. House members — including Minnesota’s Michele Bachmann — and three senators filed an amicus brief asking a federal judge to dismiss the lawsuit.
In July, the Madison, Wis.–based Freedom From Religion Foundation filed suit over plans to inscribe the Pledge of Allegiance and “In God We Trust” motto prominently in the Washington, D.C. center, charging that to do so would be unconstitutional and not representative of all Americans, including 15 percent of the population it says are nonbelievers.
Today’s brief (pdf), filed by the American Center for Law and Justice with the U.S. District Court in Madison, calls the Freedom From Religion Foundation’s cause a “crusade,” stating that it “serves no purpose other than to waste judicial resources at a time in our Nation’s history when those resources are needed in cases involving real threats to American liberties.”
The slogans in question “in no way violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. These expressions simply echo the sentiments found in the Declaration of Independence and recognize the undeniable truth that our freedoms come from a source higher than the state…. While the First Amendment affords atheists complete freedom to disbelieve, it does not compel the federal judiciary to redact religious references in every area of public life in order to suit atheistic sensibilities.”
In addition to Bachmann, fellow Minnesota Republican Rep. John Kline and Iowa’s Steve King were also represented in the brief.













13 Comments »
Comment posted November 16, 2009 @ 1:58 pm
Yes, the big issue of the day for Republicans in Congress is a plaque on the wall. If only we had that plaque on the wall, all our problems would be solved. More plaques, Republicans, more plaques. Get them in China, they are cheaper.
Comment posted November 16, 2009 @ 2:24 pm
will they add the “all others pay cash” phrase so often paired with “In God We Trust” on so many retailer’s walls?
Or is it enough that Congress is seeking to establish a religion, in violation of First Amendment restrictions on exactly that action by our congressional representatives?
Comment posted November 16, 2009 @ 3:31 pm
“serves no purpose other than to waste judicial resources at a time in our Nation’s history when those resources are needed in cases involving real threats to American liberties.”
But apparently they are A-OK with using financial resources for carving religious messages onto government property.
Are any judicial appointments currently being held up in congress?
Comment posted November 16, 2009 @ 4:25 pm
@Mill:
You are aware that is the title of a Jean Shepherd book of short stories aren’t you? (”In God We Trust:All Others Pay Cash”)
Google Books link
Comment posted November 16, 2009 @ 4:44 pm
If they’re looking to “echo the statements found in the Declaration of Independence” they could always use statements that are actually found in the Declaration of Independence.
Comment posted November 16, 2009 @ 8:53 pm
I’m old enough to remember learning the Pledge of Allegiance *before* the words “under God” were added, in the middle of the McCarthyist hysteria, as a rebuke to ‘godless Russia.’ And now these people are going on about it as though George Washington wrote those words before, or maybe as, he crossed the Delaware. It only bolsters the old adage that “Those who ignore history are doomed to vote Republican.”
Comment posted November 16, 2009 @ 10:02 pm
Dear Mill,
The government long ago acceeded in the establishment of a state religion via compulsory, secular, “humanist” public education, always committed to changing the capitalist society of America to a socialist one, thanks to the tireless efforts, over 100 years, of the National Education Association (NEA) effectively abrogating the prohibition you cite.
Comment posted November 17, 2009 @ 3:00 pm
Lindle,
Help me out.
Define necessary components of a “religion”.
Explain how “secular, humanist” constitutes a religion within that definition.
I’m pretty sure that whatever definition you come up with that qualifies “secular, humanist” as a religion will also qualify “capitalism” as a religion. And almost anything else. But maybe you’ll prove me wrong.
Comment posted November 17, 2009 @ 4:40 pm
To answer my own question:
Democrats End GOP Filibuster Against Controversial Court Nominee
What great news, because it would be a shame to “waste judicial resources at a time in our Nation’s history when those resources are needed in cases involving real threats to American liberties.”
Comment posted November 17, 2009 @ 5:17 pm
Our nation is one of citizens. The imposition of certain group’s religious belief into our government was wrong and it should be removed. This is not a christian nation nor is it a theocracy. Not all citizens believe in their god and it only serves to pervert the Constitution and diminish the religion they seek to promote.
One nation, indivisible; with liberty and justice for all.
Comment posted November 17, 2009 @ 10:04 pm
Those trying to stop the lawsuit want us to forget that the engraving is estimated to cost the taxpayers $150,000.
Those words have no place on a public building.
The Declaration of Independence in 1776 stated that NATURE’S god (rather than the god of Jews, Christians,and Muslims) gave men natural rights. It was well before the Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791, separated religion and our government.
Freedom of religion is important or it would not be in the Constitution! (Thomas Jefferson even cut the miracles out of the New Testament and George Washington didn’t take communion!)
Comment posted November 18, 2009 @ 8:46 am
no gods no devils no angels no demons no adam no eve no taking snakes{ exccept congress] no heaven no hell no virgin births no resurrected zombies no purgartory no limbo no holy water no holy books no winged horses carrying prophets no 72 virgins no animal crackers no blood wine no burning witches no torturing heretics…you are all crazy…yes to science and reason..
Comment posted November 18, 2009 @ 8:41 pm
If the word “God” causes that much offence in so many people I wonder what they will actually do when they stand before Him in person.
Weeping and Wailing and Gnashing of teeth is a pretty vivid description of that moment.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment