Religious right leaders announced Friday that they won’t abide by laws that support gay marriage or abortion. One hundred and twenty-five members of the religious right and leaders from the Catholic church signed the Manhattan Declaration. Only one signer was from Minnesota: Archbishop John Nienstedt (pictured) of the Catholic Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis.
The Manhattan Declaration is the religious right’s line in the sand: They’re vowing to ignore any laws that contradict their worldview. The document reads:
Therefore, let it be known that we will not comply with any edict that compels us or the institutions we lead to participate in or facilitate abortions, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide, euthanasia, or any other act that violates the principle of the profound, inherent, and equal dignity of every member of the human family.
Further, let it be known that we will not bend to any rule forcing us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriages or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality, marriage, and the family.
Further, let it be known that we will not be intimidated into silence or acquiescence or the violation of our consciences by any power on earth, be it cultural or political, regardless of the consequences to ourselves.
The Human Rights Campaign immediately lashed out at the signers of the Manhattan Declaration, pointing out that LGBT-rights groups have gone to great pains to make laws that protect both LGBT people and people of faith.
“This declaration simply perpetuates the fallacy that equality and religious liberty are incompatible and that every step toward fairness for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community is another burden on religious people. In reality, non-discrimination laws are working all over this country, where religious freedom is existing side-by-side with equal opportunity,” Harry Knox, director of the Human Rights Campaign’s Religion and Faith Program, said in a statement. “Advocates of LGBT equality have taken great pains in their legislative efforts to ensure that the rights of religious organizations and people under the First Amendment are protected. It is deeply cynical for the authors of this document to paint themselves as victims because they cannot have a free hand to discriminate, including with taxpayer dollars.”













22 Comments »
Comment posted November 20, 2009 @ 4:15 pm
You doth protest too much. All these people are doing is stating that they will not give abortions or euthanasia or bless homosexual marriages, even if the law attempts to force them to do so.
Comment posted November 20, 2009 @ 4:37 pm
Let us know, Michael, if you hear of an archbishop performing an abortion, OK? The medical board should be notified! Also, it’ll be cool seeing the good archbishop arrested for civil disobedience when he’s protesting the “anti-life” wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Good times.
Comment posted November 20, 2009 @ 6:30 pm
PG13, I have never heard a baby (much less, a fetus) vow to kill others. I doubt that even the Archbishop is wise enough to understand the logic in the analogy that you present.
Comment posted November 20, 2009 @ 7:19 pm
It is simply time to pull the tax exemtions of these organizations!
Comment posted November 20, 2009 @ 11:31 pm
I love the intolerance of the supposedly enlightened leftists. If you dissent from their worldview, they call you names and accuse you of bigotry when really they are the ones who are filled with hate.
Maybe homosexuals ought to call themselves Haters. That’s all they are filled with is pure hate. They have no right to judge those who disagree with them because their hearts are filled with dark hatred of anyone who disagrees.
Just as gay used to mean happy, maybe the homosexual community should rename itself the hate community.
The left is opposed to democracy because it seeks to silence dissent and ultimately criminalize disagreeing with them. Rhetoric to the contrary is pure bilge. Actions speak a lot louder than words.
Comment posted November 21, 2009 @ 8:14 am
John R. your post is full of rhetoric that is pure bilge.
Comment posted November 21, 2009 @ 8:27 am
I have no problem with these folks stating the obvious, so long as they understand that their insistence on being discriminatory towards citizens precludes their use of public funds for their operations. There is too much intermingling of Church and State as it, this should help separate those two institutions.
Comment posted November 21, 2009 @ 9:35 am
I’ll give them “queer”. i hate that they stole “gay”.
Comment posted November 21, 2009 @ 11:16 am
John, It seems to me that if the “bigots”, as you seem to admit they are, kept to themselves and didn’t try to inflict their bigotry on people who didn’t sign up for their b.s., nobody would say boo.
Comment posted November 21, 2009 @ 12:40 pm
John R., it is impossible for people who react to your bigotry with righteous indignation to be bigots themselves. Anger does not equal hate, and your baseless rhetoric fails to prove it does.
If a white woman calls a black woman a nigger, and the black woman responds with anger, the black woman is not in the wrong.
If a straight person calls a gay person a faggot, and the gay person responds with anger, the gay person is not in the wrong.
Stop trying to justify your bigotry by pointing at the anger of the LGBT community when you continue to oppress us as an excuse to continue being a bigot. It just makes you look stupid.
Comment posted November 21, 2009 @ 3:51 pm
Oh, please let them lose tax exempt status….. LORD, HEAR OUR PRAYER.
Comment posted November 21, 2009 @ 10:43 pm
HAYMEN
Pingback posted November 23, 2009 @ 5:05 am
[...] This is the article that first brought this to my attention: Catholics, evangelicals pledge to ignore LGBT and abortion rights laws « Minnesota Independent: New…. [...]
Comment posted November 23, 2009 @ 9:05 am
Leith Anderson is also an original signer. He’s listed as president of the National Assn of Evangelicals in DC, but he is also senior pastor at Wooddale Church in Eden Prairie – so there are two Minnesotans on the list. Wooddale Church has organized anti-gay marriage meetings for pastors in the past. They are a hotbed of homo hatred.
Comment posted November 23, 2009 @ 2:39 pm
In reply to “Ambrose C”:
If I am in principle, ethically and morally, against pedophiles because they exploit the mental and sexual innocence of indefenseless children, will you call me, and those who agree with me, a “hotbed of [pedo] hatred?”
You might say that pedophilia is against the “law” in this country and therefore cannot serve as an analogy. However, sodomy, homosexuality and other forms of perversions, were at one time against “the law”. Now that they are accepted, by well-meaning but deceived individuals, they are acknowledged as accepted lifestyles and anyone who disagrees with that lifestyle, by ethical or moral principle, is a “hater”?
So as long as pedophilia is illegal, I am not a hater of pedophiles. But, God forbid, if it ever becomes legal – and don’t kid yourself many are pushing for that – I would then become a pedo-hater?
This is what happens when we believe that just because something is “legal” it is therefore by extension, moral and ethical and should be embraced. It is not.
Abortion is legal, but it is immoral and perversely abominable because it exploits the most innocent as a “choice” when in actuality he/or she is a human being. And as much as the pro-death people would like, no amount of semantics can change that reality.
Comment posted November 23, 2009 @ 4:24 pm
I remember when Catholic priests demonstrated and were jailed because they were against the Vietnam war. I remember when Jews and Baptists were firehosed and jailed (if they were lucky, murdered if they weren’t) because they were for giving civil rights to American citizens. I remember the conservatives spewing hate at them and saying they were traitors, that they had no right to disobey laws.
But you don’t hear much anymore about being against war. Or poverty. Or bigotry.
Comment posted November 23, 2009 @ 4:56 pm
I noticed the church “fathers” (they are about 90% men, probably almost all white, as I am) Manhattan Declaration piously reference in their manifesto Martin Luther King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail as support. Ironically, King’s letter from Birmingham Jail, April 16, 1963, was addressed to “My Dear Fellow Clergymen” – the primary church leaders of Alabama who were effectively doing their best to make sure he’d end up in that jail. They counseled moderation (comply with the local law), even after 100 years of enforced “moderation” following the Emancipation Proclamation didn’t seem to do much good in the deep south. These “Fellow Clergymen” were big cahunas of their denominations, people like Bishops, and all white, across denomination lines in the days when ecumenism was still a novelty. Best I recall, they even placed a large ad in the newspaper to make sure their anti-demonstration message got out. A couple of years later the local Catholic Bishop tried to prohibit Priests and Nuns from supporting King’s march on Selma. The Bishop failed. These pious Manhattan folks best sober up and read not only MLK’s letter, but their brother leaders anti-protest screed that led King to write their forebears “from Birmingham Jail”. (It is easy to access MLKs letter on the internet; considerably more difficult to find the religious leaders document. It’s worth the search.) Probably a good idea to print out the Manhattan manifesto before they deep-six the reference to MLK’s Letter from the Birmingham Jail…. If memory serves, kindly Pope John XXIII powerful encylical was issued the very same week King was tossed in Jail, thanks in part to his local Bishop.
Comment posted November 23, 2009 @ 5:31 pm
The Catholic Church as late as 1866 still sanctioned slavery as a legitimate status under law. It wasnt until 1918 that the Canon Law was changed to prohibit the selling of slaves. (owning of slaves was not mentioned)In 1965 Vatican II denounced slavery in no uncertain terms.
It takes awhile for change to come to Rome.
I am not a Christian but I recently looked over the Gospel of Luke as I heard a quote that caught my eye and went looking for it. I was struck how many times Luke’s gospel condemns wealth and cites people to aid those in poverty. Not a few times but it seems a constant theme within the entire Gospel. I didnt read the whole thing, but I didnt see any mention of homosexuality in that gospel.
Pingback posted November 24, 2009 @ 5:37 am
[...] as one of discrimination/non-discrimination. The HRC’s full response is broader than the Independent’s representation. I don’t think this was to slight the HRC message, but rather, in their [...]
Comment posted November 28, 2009 @ 9:13 am
Good, the government keeps violating the separation of church and state, it’s time the church take a stand and stop them. It’s funny to me that the same people who complain that if we make abortion illegal then mothers who kill their babies will have to go to jail are the exact same people who support laws that will send me to jail if I don’t pay for their abortions.
Comment posted November 28, 2009 @ 10:28 pm
The Catholic church is denouncing what it deems “immoral sexual acts” while their churches in Ireland and elsewhere cover up the scandals of their own pedophile priests. What a strange world we live in.
Comment posted December 1, 2009 @ 8:34 am
What’s wrong with killing babies? It’s easy and fun to make them, and once born they are too much work and responsibility for many women who are busy at work and have a wonderful active and satisfying sex life. What’s wrong with killing babies?
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment