When Gov. Tim Pawlenty told MSNBC audiences early this month that “there’s a range of behavior and issue positions you can take” and still be a Republican, it created a small stir among pundits. One, Ariana Huffington, characterized Pawlenty’s sentiment as a GOP “litmus test.” But according to the New York Times’ Adam Nagourney, it’s more of a “purity” test. This morning Republican leaders circulated a list of ten principles it’ll be debating whether to adopt at its January RNC Winter Meeting. If a candidate breaks from the party on three or more of them, they’ll “be penalized by being denied party funds or the party endorsement.”
Here’s the list:
(1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama’s “stimulus” bill;
(2) We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run health care;
(3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation;
(4) We support workers’ right to secret ballot by opposing card check;
(5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants;
(6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges;
(7) We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat;
(8) We support retention of the Defense of Marriage Act;
(9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and
(10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership.













4 Comments »
Comment posted November 23, 2009 @ 3:42 pm
i’ll agree with 4 & 5
but some of the language on this list really turns me (an Independent) off from the GOP. if that’s what they want, congrats
Comment posted November 23, 2009 @ 4:04 pm
Ha ha ha ha. Love it.
8 out the 10 use the term “we support ……by opposing”
They have no ideas. They have nothing to offer.
Except opposition.
The Party of No Ideas. The Party of No.
Comment posted November 23, 2009 @ 4:12 pm
If this is adopted, I wonder what it’ll mean for politicians like Rep. Joseph Cao, the only Republican to vote for the House Democrats’ health care reform bill. In yesterday’s New York Times Magazine he said he became a Republican “because of their strong pro-life stance. That alone.” Now maybe he’d score 7 or better on the test, but as a one-time Jesuit priest-in-training, I wonder if issues like environmental stewardship or war might mean his RNC re-election funds get yanked.
Comment posted November 23, 2009 @ 6:51 pm
You forgot number 11 i propose to veto med marijuana,because i really am a moron and just dont care about the people who do support it.And by golly i will strike it down
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment