Comments on: Pawlenty’s ‘range of behavior’ for GOPers could be defined by ‘purity’ resolution

By: fsfsfs

fsfsfs — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:51:43 +0000

You forgot number 11 i propose to veto med marijuana,because i really am a moron and just dont care about the people who do support it.And by golly i will strike it down

By: Paul Schmelzer

Paul Schmelzer — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:12:04 +0000

If this is adopted, I wonder what it'll mean for politicians like Rep. Joseph Cao, the only Republican to vote for the House Democrats' health care reform bill. In yesterday's New York Times Magazine he said he became a Republican "because of their strong pro-life stance. That alone." Now maybe he'd score 7 or better on the test, but as a one-time Jesuit priest-in-training, I wonder if issues like environmental stewardship or war might mean his RNC re-election funds get yanked.

By: Tim

Tim — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:04:35 +0000

Ha ha ha ha. Love it.

8 out the 10 use the term “we support ……by opposing”

They have no ideas. They have nothing to offer.

Except opposition.

The Party of No Ideas. The Party of No.

By: mel

mel — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:42:53 +0000

i’ll agree with 4 & 5
but some of the language on this list really turns me (an Independent) off from the GOP. if that’s what they want, congrats