‘Encouraged’ by IP endorsement vote, Anderson undecided about battling Bachmann
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 at 10:40 am
Four months ago, Bob Anderson said there was one obstacle keeping him from jumping into the 6th Congressional District race next year: uncertainty about whether the Independence Party (IP) will continue its policy of cross-endorsement.
Last election, when Anderson ran as an unendorsed IP candidate, the party endorsed Elwyn Tinklenberg, who was already the DFL’s endorsed candidate. Rep. Michele Bachmann squeaked out a win, with a margin of victory of just 3 percent. Anderson garnered 10 percent of the vote.
“I don’t want to get involved in that again,” he told the Minnesota Independent in July, adding that he’d only consider running if he could vie for the party endorsement. “I want the party’s support. I don’t want ‘anti’ support.”
After Saturday’s State Party Convention in Brooklyn Park, the party decided to remove that obstacle for candidates like Anderson. It voted to stop cross-endorsing.
“Our delegates feel that offering endorsement support to candidates of the parties that brought us this systemic mess diluted our message,” Jack Uldrich, party chair, in a press release. “If other political candidates want our endorsement, they are welcome to have it but they are going to have to leave their current party to get it.”
The party also voted to keep its ban on PAC money, a move that together with ditching cross-endorsement “clarif[ies] and amplif[ies] the fact that the Independence Party is the only true reform party,” according to Uldrich.
It doesn’t clarify Anderson’s involvement in the 2010 race to unseat Bachmann, however. In an email he says he’s “encouraged by these decisions,” but he hasn’t decided yet whether he’ll run again.
He does see opportunity, though. With cross-endorsement gone, the landscape has shifted. Candidate Maureen Reed was seeking both the DFL and IP endorsements, but many pundits think DFLer Tarryl Clark is likely to get that party’s endorsement. (Clark recently got support from Sen. Al Franken, who penned a fundraising letter on her behalf.)
If that happens, Anderson, who sees Reed as more moderate than Clark, thinks he’s got a shot, should he get the IP’s nod. “I see a wide open middle if Clark defeats Reed,” Anderson said via email. “I feel Clark is too far to the left to win in the 6th District.”
There’s one scenario that could do in Anderson’s plans should he opt to run: Reed signing back on with the Independence Party and trying for anointment by the party. She ran as the party’s choice for lieutenant governor’s office in 2006.
14 Comments
Comment posted November 24, 2009 @ 3:04 pm
Neither Reed nor Anderson can win the 6th. They need Democratic votes to do it, and Clark will earn those. Anderson got 10% in the last election, and his name on the ballot split opposition to Bachmann just enough so she won re-election.
Reed should run for governor. Anderson should sit on the sidelines, so he doesn’t take votes from Clark and ensure Michele Bachmann’s re-election yet again.
Comment posted November 24, 2009 @ 11:52 pm
Maybe the split could work for the DFL. Anderson is pretty conservative. A sane conservative might split off conservatives who can’t vote for a DFLer, but realize Bachmann is nuts. Last year, it seems likely few knew he was conservative, and just cast a protest vote for a familiar name. The question for the DFL would be to make sure voters knew Anderson was a conservative so that he would draw more from Bachmann than the DFL candidate.
Comment posted November 25, 2009 @ 4:46 pm
And Bob Anderson is more of a social conservative than a fiscal conservative.
Comment posted November 25, 2009 @ 6:34 pm
Eric, you are correct. The media last time was protecting El Tinklenberg so they did not mention me in news stories. I tried to get the message out that I was an alternative conservative choice for voters in this very conservative district. I line up with Bachmann on many issues but I feel a need to respect and appreciate the position of Congressman. I would not only be representing my constituents but the great state of Minnesota.
Comment posted November 25, 2009 @ 6:45 pm
Eva, I am more of a fiscal conservative than a social conservative. I am the one that thinks it is absolutely ridiculous the money the Democrats and Republicans spend on these elections. I was the only fiscal conservative in the race last time and would be again this time.
Comment posted November 30, 2009 @ 8:14 am
Bob Anderson is also the one who said the problem with schools is that we’ve removed God from them…I was at that convention.
Comment posted December 4, 2009 @ 6:23 pm
Don’t split the vote. A Democrat will never ever never win in this gerrymandered district. We need to join behind Dr. Reed on the Independent ticket and get this crazy woman out of the public eye before I gouge mine out.
Comment posted December 4, 2009 @ 6:30 pm
If Anderson wants to try to beat Bachmann in the primary, more power to him. I’ll send him a check.
Comment posted December 6, 2009 @ 1:42 pm
Lazercat, I agree with you. I don’t feel a Democrat can win in this district. I think Dr Reed would be a great Independent but she has decided to run as a Dem. I do feel she has less baggage than Sen Clark. Tarryl Clark has a liberal voting record and was a lobbyist before taking office. I feel once you go down the road of being a lobbyist your chances for higher office are marginal.
Comment posted December 6, 2009 @ 8:57 pm
We’ll see when the campaign money starts coming in. Then we will know where their loyalties lie. Personally I’m not voting for anyone who takes money from Corporations, out of state donations, PACs, 501 or 527 non profits. We have to stop the big money from destroying our leaders.
Comment posted December 6, 2009 @ 9:32 pm
I just wanted to be clear on a couple of things.
First being a lobbyist is not a bad thing. Lawmakers need to make informed decisions and lobbyists can help them with difficult issues.
Second, money is the enemy of government not lobbyists. We have to realize that campaign finance and getting reelected is costing obscene amounts of money. Why, because it works. Deceptive ads from 501 and 527 “non profits” can attack the truth without any visible ties to candidates. The amounts of money it takes to get elected and staying elected cause the problems. We need to reform our campaign contribution laws.
Labeling Senator Clark as a lobbyist is a distortion of the facts. Her background is as a lobbyist for non profit groups not corporations.
From her previous record of beating Republicans, I think Senator Clark and prove me wrong.
Comment posted December 7, 2009 @ 8:19 pm
Lazercat, I did not say being a lobbyist is bad thing. I just feel that if you choose to be a paid lobbyist whether it is for a non profit or corporation than it hurts your chances for higher office. We are trying to rid Washington of lobbyists we are not apt to elect one. I agree that money is the problem in politics. I refused to take money last time and still received over 10% of the vote. The Independence party is the only one of the three main parties that does not allow candidates to take PAC money. I suggest you take a look at their platform you might be interested.
Comment posted December 8, 2009 @ 12:09 am
The Independence party is my choice in all elections, although the Independence party almost got Coleman another term. I think we need to remove Bachmann more than we need an Independent in the seat don’t you?
I’m not asking you to bow out, I’m just asking if your can’t win will you know when to say when?
Comment posted December 9, 2009 @ 8:10 pm
Lazercat,I would love to replace Bachmann. I really think we need an independent in Congress. I do not support some of the antics of Congresswoman Bachmann and the amount of money she spends on elections. I do not support the DFL leadership of Pelosi and Reid. I think the Dem’s have really let down their supporters and have shown a real lack of leadership. I do feel I fit the District and I have to convince the media to give me a fair shot. The voters should be able to hear all the candidates and then they can make an educated decision on their own. Thank you for your civil dialogue,I appreciate it.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






