Twin Cities Quakers won’t sign marriage certificates until gays can marry

By Andy Birkey
Tuesday, December 08, 2009 at 11:32 am
(Lavverrue, Flickr)

(Lavverrue, Flickr)

A meeting of Twin Cities Quakers has decided to stop signing marriage certificates until all couples in Minnesota are allowed to marry. The decision, made in November, was a topic of Minnesota Public Radio’s All Things Considered on Monday.

Paul Landskroener, a clerk for the Twin Cities Friends Meeting, said that the group decided to forgo legalizing heterosexual unions “until we can do so for all the couples we witness.” For Quakers, the term “meeting” is similar to a congregation.

“We feel very strongly and very clearly led. And at the present time we simply cannot participant in what we believe to be unjust and inconsistent with out religious testimony,” he told MPR. “We have always been willing to accept the burdens of our testimonies. And this is a very small burden we believe to place on our members to speak the truth.

Different branches among Quakers take differing views on the issue. The more conservative groups, including the Friends United Meeting (FUM) and Evangelical Friends International (EFI), have taken a hard-line stance on homosexuality and same-sex marriage. Twin Cities Quakers are affiliated with the Friends General Conferencem which has adopted a stance in full support of LGBT equality.

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Categories & Tags: LGBT| | | | |

Comments

6 Comments

Dano
Comment posted December 8, 2009 @ 4:40 pm

I thought all the Quakers kicked off? Learn something new every day.


phil
Comment posted December 8, 2009 @ 6:15 pm

Dano wrote
I thought all the Quakers kicked off? Learn something new every day.

It is the Shakers who have died of, no sex no followers


Dano
Comment posted December 9, 2009 @ 10:28 am

Ahhh, I got the two confused. Thanks Phil.


Steve H
Comment posted December 9, 2009 @ 9:31 pm

The quakers were the first to openly oppose slavery as well. God love ‘em.


Verv
Comment posted December 13, 2009 @ 11:11 pm

““We feel very strongly and very clearly led. And at the present time we simply cannot participant in what we believe to be unjust and inconsistent with out religious testimony,””

Because the Bible is pro gay marriage?

I was unaware that quakers were this absurd in their interpretation of the testament.

How can they be so hardline about so many things, and then so confusingly soft on others?


Stan James
Comment posted July 12, 2010 @ 11:03 pm

The Quakers are good people, who if they ruled the earth, it would have no wars.

This is just another example of their supporting good, and fighting evil.

Some Episcopal and UCC churches do the same thing. The movement is growing.

I’m agnostic Jewish, I should prob look at the Quakers, been to one of their services. No big bulls#!t sermons, no rants against minorities etc. Dignified, simple, and no big fancy ceremonies supporting BS.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.