First it was the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) that Congresswoman Michele Bachmann claimed was the “most perfect place on the planet to drill” for oil. Now, the overnight energy expert has declared that she would “welcome” another nuclear power plant in the 6th Congressional District—and specifically in her own backyard.
“Another nuclear power plant would bring down the price of people’s monthly energy bills,” said Bachmann. Xcel Energy already operates one nuclear power plant in the district at Monticello, where high-level spent radioactive waste storage on-site in dry casks was approved in 2006.
Bachmann spoke glowingly of John McCain’s plan to add 45 more nuclear power plants to America’s energy supply.
“It’s a great idea. And the sooner the better,” Bachmann told hometownsource.com, an online extension of ECM Publications in the northern suburbs.
Sixty-six nuclear power plants with 104 reactors operating in the U.S. According to the Scientific American, the industry is beginning a resurgence. The first application for a new nuclear reactor in 30 years was filed last year by a Texas utility, and more are on the way:
Armed with the backing of the White House and congressional leaders—and subsidies, such as $500 million in risk insurance from the U.S. Department of Energy— the nuclear industry is experiencing a revival in the U.S. As many as 29 new reactors may be added to the current U.S. fleet of 104, according to Bill Borchardt, director of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) office of new reactors. “It is going to be significantly different than it was in the 1970s,” he says.
While pro-nuke evangelists like Bachmann preach that nuclear power can stand on its own without subsidies, they conveniently fail to mention the Price-Anderson Act, which limits the U.S. nuclear industry’s liability in the event of an accident to a total of about $10.5 billion. After that, the taxpayers pick up the tab—and that could conservatively run into the hundreds of billions of dollars.
Estimates of the value of the Price-Anderson subsidy to the industry vary widely, from $237 million to $3.5 billion annually. However, it’s clear that the subsidy insulates the industry from much of its risk and unfairly distorts nuclear power’s competitiveness in the energy marketplace.
Bachmann didn’t specify in which back yard she wanted a new nuclear power plant. While she currently resides in Stillwater, the Bachmanns’ house is on the market and they are moving to Woodbury, according to her office.
In either case, it’s not likely that her neighbors will be joining her in rolling out the welcome mat for a nuke on the street.




12 Comments »
Comment posted August 22, 2008 @ 1:59 pm
Hey, I'm all for more nuclear power!
Comment posted August 22, 2008 @ 3:09 pm
Karl, wake up and smell the roses. The train your riding on has been abandoned by it's drivers, who are now preaching the wonderful benefits of nuclear power to the environment. Do you want the earth to stop melting or not. Why you so-called “conservationists” still have a place to post your overly simplistic viewpoints of the world amazes me to no end.
Comment posted August 22, 2008 @ 3:28 pm
Discussion on DU… with pictures:
http://tinyurl.com/67u58m
Comment posted August 23, 2008 @ 6:55 am
“In either case, it’s not likely that her neighbors will be joining her in rolling out the welcome mat for a nuke on the street.”
I will be. Sadly your article is nothing but fear mongering. I'd take a nuclear plant over coal any day of the week. And for the record… the Monti plant is in my backyard. Do some research before you opine. The design of nuclear power plants is radically different then the TMI days. Smaller, reliability extremely high, and generate less radioactive waste than their predecessors.
Comment posted August 23, 2008 @ 11:27 am
Tell the people of Chernobyl of the “wonderful benefits of nuclear energy to the enviroment.” That is when they can return to that city in about 2075.
I am an attorney who works in the insurance industry and am well aware of the specifics of the Price-Anderson Act, and Karl's point regarding liability in the case of an accident is a very legitimate concern.
I am not opposed to nuclear energy as long as there are no disruptions of regulations in controling their operation.
But don't sugar coat nuclear energy.
Comment posted August 23, 2008 @ 2:53 pm
You don't sound like an attorney. Give me a break. Regarding Chernobyl; that plant was built in the 50's. How much technology from the 50's is relevant now? Apples and oranges Dan. And one other thing. That was Soviet blok for one. Can you honestly tell me with a straight face that the Soviets, Chinese and many other countries give a rats ass about the environment? Chinas environmetal record sucks. I'd like to see Karl or some of the other writers at MNind. write about the socialists demanding we power this country with windmills but don't say a peep about Chinas filth they're putting in the air. Or better yet, go through their house and see how much of the crap they own is made in China.
Comment posted August 24, 2008 @ 12:03 am
I think it's a fine idea, as long as she promises to store the spent rods in her basement and as long as her basement is on Mars.
Comment posted August 24, 2008 @ 3:52 pm
AS NATION SAYS 'DRILL,' NANCY SAYS 'STALL'
http://www.nypost.com/seven/08212008/postopinio...
Comment posted August 24, 2008 @ 3:58 pm
The world has gone though countless ice ages and intermittent periods of warming. The last ice age was about then thousand years ago. This is a natural phenomenon outside the control of humankind. The earth is not melting.
Comment posted August 25, 2008 @ 12:47 pm
Most of you “twits” make me want to puke, don't drill, don't build just keep making foreign countries rich beyond their wildest dreams and for the rest of us working folks the dems are already licking their lips because they just can't wait to raise any tax they can dream up. Also I would like to see both sides of the aisle go on social security instead of the lavish plan they voted themselves on our backs!! Be very careful what you wish for because it can come back and bite you in the butt.
Comment posted August 25, 2008 @ 1:04 pm
I wonder if she knows what side of the bed she gets out on she has her head the same place George Bush has his and not on their shoulders
Comment posted August 29, 2008 @ 11:09 am
Nuclear power is the cleanest and most effective power available. I would welcome a plant “in my backyard”.
We need to quit pretending that our way of life can do without power. Where will the power come from for all of the electric cars that some want us all to drive. The power doesn't magically appear from the wall outlet. It is produced in power plants which are mostly coal fired.
We need to drill, build refineries, build nuclear, and coal power plants. Our technologies today are much advanced to the point that we can do all of these safely, cleanly, and efficiently. If we don't act, we will continue to be ruled by the oil producing counties who all seem to hate us and love our money.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment