Abortion activist praises Tiller murderer for his ‘faithfulness and brave actions’

By Jason Hancock
Tuesday, February 02, 2010 at 4:19 pm
Dave Leach

Dave Leach

Following the murder conviction of Scott Roeder last week, another anti-abortion activist who is in prison for shooting the same Kansas doctor in the early ’90s says the judge in Roeder’s case was pressured by fear of violence to disallow the necessity defense.

Des Moines, Iowa–based anti-abortion activist Dave Leach appears in one of a series of Web videos arguing that killing doctors who perform abortions is justified, and that judges should allow the theory to be argued in court.

Shelley Shannon, who is serving time at the Federal Correctional Institution in Waseca, Minn., for shooting and wounding Dr. George Tiller outside his clinic in 1993, sent Des Moines anti-abortion activist Dave Leach an e-mail to give to the press Tuesday. In it, she decried the judge’s decision to instruct the jury that it would not be allowed to to consider any lesser charges than first-degree murder.

Roeder shot and killed Tiller last May. He openly admitted to the crime in order to use the necessity defense, which says it is permissible to commit a crime if it stops a greater harm.

Leach drafted the necessity defense legal brief for Roeder, who was planning to argue he killed Tiller to stop him from performing abortions. Legal experts said because abortion is legal, the defense was not possible, and if allowed, would open the door to violence against abortion providers. Ultimately, the judge agreed.

“The claim was made that if Scott had been allowed to use the true defense of his actions, it would lead to more abortionists being killed,” Shannon said in her e-mail. “I believe Scott’s judge was influenced by that and other media/pro-abort pressure to change his mind and not allow Scott his defense. Abortionists are killed because they are serial murderers of innocent children who must be stopped, and they will continue to be stopped, even though Scott didn’t get a fair trial. May God bless Scott for his faithfulness and brave actions and stand.”

Leach, who publishes a newsletter that advocates the doctrine of justifiable homicide in the case of abortion doctors, said the defense should have been allowed since “Scott Roeder had no quarrel with George Tiller other than his commission of infanticide.”

“God indicated what he thought the trial was about by arranging for it to begin on the 37th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade,” Leach said. “God is relevant, and what He commands is legal, though the whole world opines otherwise.”

Before the trial began, Leach said it was disingenuous to argue that using the necessity defense in this case would lead to more violence.

“Let’s get real here: the 60,000 notches on Tiller’s scalpel of whom he boasted on his website constitute ‘violence.’ Anything that reduces abortion reduces ‘violence,’” he said. “But my vision is to reduce all the violence: against babies, and against abortionists. Abortionists will be unemployed, but safe”

Jason Hancock is the editor of the Iowa Independent.

Categories & Tags: Reproductive Rights|

Comments

5 Comments

Dave
Comment posted February 2, 2010 @ 5:35 pm

“Abortionists are killed because they are serial murderers.”

You have to rape the English language for that to be true. Killing of an “abortionist” is murder. That would make Roeder a commandment breaker, wouldn’t it?

What did they do to murderers in the Old Testament? Any why isn’t Roeder volunteering for that?


majii
Comment posted February 2, 2010 @ 8:00 pm

If these people profess to be “christians,” and claim to believe in the Bible, they must prepare themselves to spend eternity with Mephistopheles and his assistants roasting in the fires of Hades for supporting something they KNOW is a violation of one of the Ten Commandments, “Thou shalt not kill.”


GadZooks
Comment posted February 4, 2010 @ 1:23 pm

It’s wrong to celebrate murder; but it is fair to say that the planet is certainly no worse for Tiller’s having left it and perhaps the human race has taken one small step forward with his absence from the gene pool.


Tim
Comment posted February 4, 2010 @ 4:30 pm

Gadzooks,

What breathless arrogance. “..it is fair to say that the planet is certainly no worse for……”.

You decide what is “fair to say”? You decide whether the planet is better off or not? You speculate that the human race has taken a “small step forward”?

What a small, smug narcissist you must be. Or perhaps you are God since you make such judgments.


Dave
Comment posted February 4, 2010 @ 4:51 pm

Some people probably deserve to find out the hard way why Dr. Tiller’s services were necessary for the most desperate of his patients.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.