Family-farm advocates call for U.S. to ‘bust up big ag’

By Lynda Waddington
Friday, March 12, 2010 at 10:15 am

ANKENY, IOWA — Whether they realized it or not, the roughly 250 family farmers, workers and consumers gathered in Ankeny, Iowa, Thursday night fired off their own point-by-point response to a letter from two Republican senators that urged the U.S. departments of agriculture and justice to maintain the existing status quo in the agriculture industry.

Speakers line up to comment at Thursday night's townhall. Photo by Lynda Waddington, Iowa Independent

Speakers line up to comment at Thursday night's townhall. Photo: Lynda Waddington, Iowa Independent

The often rambunctious townhall event was organized by a coalition of groups concerned that everyday people do not have adequate opportunity to express their opinions on the agricultural industry at a joint U.S. Department of Justice and USDA antitrust workshop on Friday. And it had one overarching message: “Bust up big ag.”

“We are here today to make sure that the voices of everyday people are heard loud and clear and send a simple but powerful message to our government regulators and elected officials,” said Barb Kalbach, a fourth generation family farmer from Dexter and board member for Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement. “Bust up big ag, pass policies that promote sustainable agriculture and local markets, and put people first during the workshop series by prioritizing public comments and input and adding more family farmers and consumers to panels.”

On Wednesday, however, two Republicans in leadership positions on the Senate Agriculture Committee urged U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack to do just the opposite.

“We urge you to ensure that these sessions are balanced and reflect the wide array of producers and business operations in modern-day agriculture,” wrote Sens. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia and Pat Roberts of Kansas.

After noting that “American agriculture is responsible for feeding the world,” that many industry “segments have become more vertically-integrated” and “other small and successful agriculture businesses have merged” to meet demands, the senators note that change is often met with frustration.

“Such change has led to better income margins for producers and processors as well as lower prices for consumers,” they wrote, adding that competition issues have been “studied extensively by several entities including the United State Congress and, specifically, the Senate Agricultural Committee.”

Although Chambliss and Roberts appear to call for a wide swath of American agriculture to have representation at the meeting, it is difficult to overlook the key point of their correspondence:

“Beyond our interest in a balanced review, we would hope that no correlation is planned between the upcoming workshops and current enforcement activity in your respective Departments. From recent news of lawsuits to undo mergers to heightened scrutiny of pre-merger activity and other investigative activities with agribusiness companies from a variety of sectors, it is readily apparent that both the Department of Agriculture and Department of Justice are already quite engaged in this area. We are concerned there is potential for your workshops to become venues for further fact-finding or public scrutiny of agricultural businesses that are already subject to existing antitrust laws and in some cases are under investigation or prosecution by the federal government.”

As of 2007, more than 45 percent of U.S. beef cattle are slaughtered by four companies (Tyson, Cargill, Swift and National.) Most U.S. Pork is also processed by just four companies (Tyson, Cargill, Swift and Smithfield). Seed corn is controlled predominately by two companies (Pioneer Dupont and Monsanto), and roughly 40 percent of the U.S. fluid milk supply is controlled by one company (Dean’s Foods).

Rhonda Perry, a Missouri livestock and grain farmer, said 30,000 cattle feed lots went out of business in the last 13 years. During the past 20 years, the nation lost 70 percent of its independent family hog farmers — but managed to keep production levels the same.

“We’ve been told that we have to have consolidation, concentration and vertical-integration in order to give consumers the cheap food they desire,” she said. “The reality is, if you look at the pork industry — a prime example because it has become really vertically-integrated in the last 25 years — that between 1985 and 2008 pork prices to consumers went up by 72 percent. At the same time the hog farmers’ share of that consumer dollar went down by 43 percent. So, somebody in this industry, in this consolidation process, is definitely getting rich. It’s working for somebody, but it is not working for producers and consumers.”

Fred Dowered, a Minnesota farmer, told the audience that when he began farming 34 years ago his state had 50 seed companies. Now, however, there are only four.

“When there were 50 seed companies, the price of seed corn was held to its own. Now they just let it go rampant,” he said.

That’s a situation that Jim Kalbach, an Adair Couty grain farmer, knows all too well.

“Monsanto soybean seed was $31 a bag last year. Now they jumped it up one third to $41 a bag — in one year,” he said. “That’s highway robbery.”

Many of the men and women in the audience also took exception to the belief that the U.S. food supply boasts the most healthy and inexpensive food in the world.

“The two things we are going to hear over and over on Friday is that we’ve got the cheapest and safest food supply in the world. Both of these statements are damn lies” said Gary Klicker, a southern Iowa producer that can trace his family’s agricultural roots to 1666.

Klicker believes that taxpayers will be out “billions if not trillions” of dollars cleaning up rivers, nourishing soil and dealing with abandoned animal confinement facilities.

“Have you ever heard of 19 million pound beef recall in Sweden or Germany or Russia or Cuba or anywhere else? The food isn’t safe. We are eating garbage off the floors of our packing houses. It’s being fed to our kids in schools, and it goes into our grocery stores. Most of the people have no idea what they are getting, and wouldn’t know what real food tastes like if they had it. This is a serious, serious situation — one that we will be paying for 100 years from now. It isn’t safe. It isn’t even cheap.”

Although U.S. Sens. Tom Harkin and Chuck Grassley are on the schedule for Friday, along with U.S. Rep. Leonard Boswell, no federal elected officials attended the townhall meeting in person. A handful of audience members used their very limited comment period to note their disappointment that the officials themselves did not attend, and at least two were openly hostile toward lawmakers who had long-served without providing notable solutions to the competition issues in their industry.

“This was a huge crowd,” Dave Campbell, district representative for Boswell, said following the meeting. “What I’m going to pass on to the Congressman is the fact that were a whole lot of people here who are hurting. He will have an opportunity to hear from both sides, and will hopefully make the best decisions possible.”

John Moreland, staff assistant for Harkin, also said that he would be taking his reflections on the “passion” expressed at the meeting back to his boss.

A notable appearance at the townhall was made by members of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union. After the meeting Mark Lauritsen, vice president and director of the UFCW Meatpacking Division, explained that his members understand how closely their livelihood is tied to that of the farmer.

“We should have been getting together back in the 1980s and having these discussions. … Our lives are connected with farmers. Our members’ lives are connected to farmers. Our success rises and falls with the American farmer,” he said.

Producers from at least 10 states traveled to Ankeny for the townhall. Many also plan to attend the workshop, and would like opportunity to speak. Since only one hour at the end of the day has been allotted for public comment, however, it isn’t likely that there will be time for them all. That being said, it also isn’t likely that these motivated individuals are going to go away. Wisconsin Dairy producer Joel Greeno said several groups are already gearing up for the June meeting planned in their state, and that other producers are organizing in relation to the workshops planned for Colorado and Alabama later this year.

“The situation in agriculture these days, even though it has been coming on for a long time, is reaching critical mass,” said Frank Jones, a Missouri owner and producer. “I’m afraid that if we don’t have some type of meaningful change in the way business is done that agriculture will be lost forever.”

Categories & Tags: Agriculture| |

Comments

7 Comments

Dave Mowers
Comment posted March 13, 2010 @ 3:47 pm

They stay just under 50% of the market share so they will never be prosecuted under antitrust laws. The laws are outdated anyway they should use the original corporation laws established which mandated that no State-issued corporation could cross State lines and conduct business in another State unless they hold a market share of 5% or more. Then, any company able to do business in multiple States should be limited in those additional States they operate in to a maximum of 5% market share per State. Each State should have its’ own commission overseeing both industry and consumer complaints divided into one-third publicly appointed officials, one-third elected officials and one-third industry. So that no one party can dominate the debates or control the parameters of debate and creation of laws. If they do not try something new large companies like Monsanto who must increase profits every quarter will eventually as they are now degrade American food production in the pursuit of company bonuses and shareholder profits. Anyone interested in this topic should check out the documentary FoodInc.


bud dingler
Comment posted March 14, 2010 @ 2:38 am

here’s an idear.

pass a law that no farming entity (business or individual) can receive any federal government subsidies, loans or assistance with an income of 250K or larger.


LYN MCLAURIN
Comment posted March 14, 2010 @ 5:41 pm

I agree the food is not so good for us and wonder if anyone has done research on how this “new” food could be causing the obseity problem in America. Perhaps because nutrition is missing in today’s food, we eat more and more because our bodies are not receiving the nutrition needed which leaves us continually thinking we are hungry. It becomes a vicious cycle. Just saying.


Tim
Comment posted March 15, 2010 @ 5:06 pm

Hey small farmers,

Know who your biggest allies would be in doing this?

Liberals! Progressives!!!. Just imagine the powerful combination of farm reformers and progressives.

If you ever wake up and smell the coffee, let us know. We’ve been in favor of breaking up business conglomerates since Teddy Roosevelt was President.

But maybe you’d rather keep on believing what mega-millionaires like Limbaugh and Beck keep telling you. Look at every Republican Administration since the Civil War, and you’ll see a severe farm depression. Coolidge, Hoover, Eisenhower, Reagan, both Bushes.

They aren’t your friends, they play you for fools.


ZNOFOB
Comment posted March 16, 2010 @ 7:12 am

Government intrusion onto market forces and they call it free market.

USDA is the longer arm of Monsanto, Inc. Try to buy non-GMO seeds somewhere else. Go ahead. Try.

Farmers are being mashed out, like a stale cigarette butt in a glass ashtray. Big ag is not friendly business to farmers, much less to PEOPLE. They feed us with genetically modified trash, polluting the world with genetically modified monster crops. Where does that extra genetic material go when the bees pollenate the GMO corn next to a natural corn crop? Hmmm?


“American agriculture is responsible for feeding the world.” « Thoughts 4 Thinking
Pingback posted March 17, 2010 @ 10:17 am

[...] is one quote that both sides seem to be using over and over, “American agriculture is responsible for feeding the world.” it was taken from [...]


Jim
Comment posted March 19, 2010 @ 10:00 pm

here’s an idear.

pass a law that no farming entity (business or individual) can receive any federal government subsidies, loans or assistance with an income of $0 or larger or SMALLER.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.