Ellison considers resolution in support of Mumia Abu-Jamal
Wednesday, March 17, 2010 at 11:54 am
U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., isn’t afraid to speak his mind.
He was bold enough to show up at a speaking event of former Black Panther Dhoruba Bin Wahad at Walker Church in South Minneapolis late last month. And after he was called on by Wahad, Ellison went toe-to-toe with the former political prisoner, eventually promising the crowd he’d consider a congressional resolution questioning the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal — who was convicted of murdering a Philadelphia policeman in 1982, although supporters say he didn’t receive a fair trial.
It was an often contentious half-hour dialog that spanned topics from the occupation of Palestine to Jim Crow laws.
After urgings from the sometimes restless crowd, Ellison said he hadn’t previously considered a congressional resolution in support of Abu-Jamal.
“You asked me about Mumia Abu-Jamal. You put something on my mind tonight,” Ellison told the crowd. “You want something done on Mumia Abu-Jamal: Let’s begin that conversation.”
After a long appeal process, the Supreme Court ruled that Abu-Jamal’s conviction could stand last year.
But the main thrust of the debate between Ellison and Wahad revolved around the best method to create social change. Wahad argued that social change comes from actively confronting oppression instead of working in the system.
“Is working to change the system with good intentions futile — yes,” Wahad said during the debate. “I don’t like tyrants, I don’t like oppressors — that’s why I spent 19 years in prison.”
Ellison said people fighting for social change need to get comfortable with acquiring some power.
“You correctly identify American foreign policy as a very dangerous thing for people all over the world — I think you’re right about that,” Ellison told Wahad. “You want to promote cynicism and I’m trying to promote positive social change and economic change for people.”
Ellison said there’s a broad dissatisfaction across racial lines in the United States and that Wahad’s rhetoric created barriers to real social change.
“[It's not productive] to argue there’s some impenetrable barrier between people of different racial groups,” Ellison told the crowd. “The fact is that there’s always been, I think you would agree, a number of interracial collections of people fighting oppression.”
Wahad’s speech was titled, “Political repression and state violence from Minneapolis to Palestine.” He was released from prison after an appeal found prosecutors withheld evidence.
According to the introduction, the event was sponsored by Communities United Against Police Brutality and the RNC8 Defense Committee, which supports eight Minneapolis activists who are facing felony conspiracy charges from their arrests before the Republican National Convention in 2008.
“I’ll get word back to you” on the possible Abu-Jamal resolution, Ellison told the crowd.
Via Twin Cities Indymedia, video of the event:
9 Comments
Comment posted March 18, 2010 @ 8:19 am
Ellison is right about the tone of reconciliation needing to be steady and purposeful. He is also right about people seeking to get through the divisions.
I will wait to see if he has the drive to act.
Saying something is easy. “I’ll get word back to you”.
Comment posted March 18, 2010 @ 3:33 pm
i think Obama and Holder should pardon Mumia Abu-Jamal, but i think they should do it now instead of waiting until the end of a term like most other administrations have done. that would be change.
Comment posted March 21, 2010 @ 6:33 pm
I TOTALLY OPPOSE THE DEATH PENALTY. I DON’T THINK IT IS RIGHT TO KILL PEOPLE. HUMAN BEINGS CANT GIVE LIFE SO THEY SHOULD NOT KILL.ONLY GOD GIVES LIFE SO ONLY HIM SHOULD KILL.
FREE IMAM JAMIL ALA MIN,HE IS BEEN IN JAIL TOO LONG. EVEN IF HE KILLED HE ALREADY PAID FOR IT, WITH ALL THOSE YEARS OF HIS LIFE IN JAIL.
Comment posted March 22, 2010 @ 1:41 pm
Jimmy,
I totally agree with you, but since they are not going to do that let him rot in jail.
Comment posted March 23, 2010 @ 6:52 pm
Google it, Dano. Homeboy been sentenced to death, and he’ll be meeting his virgins shortly.
Comment posted March 25, 2010 @ 10:27 am
To all people in the forum….
No one should be “sentenced to death”….and as progressive as the USA is with everything…they still have such inhumane procedures as the “Death-penalty” which is totally absurd in my view….
NO ONE has the “right” to take someone’s life as “revenge” for “murder”….as in the “Tit-for-Tat” principle which does NOT resolve anything and is most counter-productive !!!
Injustice can not be “excecuted” with another INJUST act (death-penalty)- That is NOT in the concern of the “Universal Law”….- so -…in essence the whole “Legal system” should be revised in my opinion !!!
Besides…incarceration in many cases is counter-productive and doesn’t resolve the “root of the problem”…Furthermore….being “behind bars” doesn’t “change a person” for the “Better” (as the statistics of “repeated offenders” show prove of) and the authorities in charge should think of a more progressive way of “punishment”/ rehabilitation in the future…
In closing I’d like to plea for the release of those who have suffered over many years and grant them a chance to be a useful part of “society” once again….Best greetings from Germany with all my LOVE for peace…freedom and unity of mankind….Annette***
Comment posted May 17, 2010 @ 2:00 pm
Annette, please send your address to the US Penal authorities and allow them to send you a boat load of prisoners that have spent 25 years or more for rape, murder, aggravated assault and various other petty crimes. I am sure you would like to have them in for sausage and kraut. If you do not want them in your country, why should we release them when they have been found guilty of heinous crimes in our country?
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.








