Cops, church group oppose GOP’s Arizona-style immigration bill
Friday, May 07, 2010 at 1:15 pm
The Arizona-style anti-immigration bill introduced yesterday by state Republicans isn’t winning over two constituencies: cops and churches. As City Pages reports, Minneapolis Police Chief Tim Dolan and St. Paul Police Chief John Harrington issued a joint statement flatly opposing the measure. “The culture of fear that this bill will instill in immigrant communities… will endanger all residents,” they wrote. And the nonprofit refugee-relief group Church World Service issued a statement calling the bill a “poorly conceived and ill-informed… unfunded mandate.”
Harrington and Dolan expressed concern over putting cops on the “front line” of immigration issues. An excerpt from their statement:
We believe that mobilizing local police to serve as primary enforcers of federal immigration laws will throw up barriers of mistrust and cause a chilling effect in immigrant communities, impairing our ability to build partnerships and engage in problem-solving that improves the safety of all members of the community. The culture of fear that this bill will instill in immigrant communities will keep victims of crime and people with information about crime from coming forward, and that will endanger all residents.
It is a mistake for our state to try to fix our nation’s immigration system. We urge Minnesota lawmakers and the people of our state to join with us in denouncing HF3830. We believe this bill runs contrary to the values of community policing and problem-solving that the people we serve have rightly demanded and will make our communities less safe.
Rev. John Guttermann, Church World Service’s Minnesota immigration field director, says the measure, the “Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act” (H.F. 3830), arises from “an exaggerated sense of fear and a simplistic conception of both the problems of immigration and the solutions needed.”
“It will not make Minnesotans safer,” he said. He continued, echoing the Twin Cities’ police chiefs’ concerns:
“Minnesota H. F. 3830 imposes an unfunded mandate on local governments. If enacted, police will be pulled from the street to do what is a Federal responsibility. There will not be a public safety benefit. Government agencies, police, and the courts will experience significant demand increases for their limited resources at a time of reduced budgets. Immigrants, documented and undocumented alike will, if H. F. 3830 is enacted, become hesitant to report or become involved in reporting crimes; this will hurt all communities.”
He also cited a 2009 Humphrey Institute study (PDF) that tallies both the benefits of immigrants to the state and the economic harm caused by an enforcement-only policy when dealing with undocumented immigrants: “If undocumented immigrants were removed from Minnesota’s economy, the state would lose over 24,000 permanent jobs and $1.2 billion in personal income. This is a long-term estimate and it assumes that the economy would have had time to adjust to the changes,” the report states.
6 Comments
Comment posted May 7, 2010 @ 4:40 pm
Funny how the police chiefs pick and choose which “Federal Agendas” they will or will not follow. Calling the Immigration Authorities to come pick up an illegal alien would give the alien a witness. Harder to steal their money, tv’s, cars, etc.
Comment posted May 7, 2010 @ 11:54 pm
These two poice chiefs might also consider refusing to respond to bank robberies. It’s FBI’s responsibility, let the feds do it.
Why should the illegal class of residents be exempt from our laws ?
Comment posted May 8, 2010 @ 2:33 pm
Magyart, robbery is a state crime, no matter where it happens. It’s also a violent felony.
I’m not opposed to illegal aliens being deported. But no one can tell me what reasonable suspicion that someone is not here legally looks like. And how does any natural-born citizen prove they are here legally?
Comment posted May 19, 2010 @ 8:22 pm
All people coming into the United States are Told that they must carry a green card on them at all times. If you are here legally then I do not think anyone would have a problem with showing your ID card–but, if you are here illegally, yes, then you might not like the law. The other means is to look for people with warrants or those hiding from the law. We have a Federal Law but we need it enforced by every state.
Comment posted May 19, 2010 @ 10:39 pm
Absolutely not true. My wife was specifically told not to carry her green card with her because it’s a target for theft.
Comment posted May 19, 2010 @ 11:24 pm
If you can obtain a tape of the Hannity show on Fox of May 18,2010 there is a panel discussion on immigration. I do not remember his name but the gentleman from England leads the conversation telling the panel how he was told to carry his green card in his billfold at all times to show if needed.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






